22.) Consider a market subject to a negative externality cause by pollution. Suppose that, initially, the government is dealing with this negative externality using a Pigouvian tax. The government is considering switching its handling of the negative externality to a scheme where it auctions off pollution licenses to producer instead. If the government makes this policy change, then producer surplus will and government surplus will a.) Increase, increase b.) Decrease, decrease c.) Decrease, increase d.) None of the above

22.) Consider a market subject to a negative externality cause by pollution. Suppose that, initially, the government is dealing with this negative externality using a Pigouvian tax. The government is considering switching its handling of the negative externality to a scheme where it auctions off pollution licenses to producer instead. If the government makes this policy change, then producer surplus will and government surplus will a.) Increase, increase b.) Decrease, decrease c.) Decrease, increase d.) None of the above

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

f.) What is the dead weight loss of allowing the market for plastic bags to operate competitively, free of government intervention?
4. Suppose the supply curve of portable radio rentals in Golden Gate Park is given by P= 5+ 0.1Q and the demand curve is by P = 20 -0.2Q. a. If each portable radio imposes $3 per day in noise costs on others, by how much will the market equilibrium quantity exceed the socially optimal number of rentals? b. How would the imposition of a $3 per unit tax affect the efficiency in this market?
Refer to Figure. Which of the following statements is correct? Price 22 24 22 81 18 16 Social cost (private cost and external cost) Supply (private cost) Demand (private value) 120 160 Quantity a. The private cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $16 b. The social cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $22. c. d. The external cost of producing the 160th unit of output is $6. All of the above are correct.
2. The effect of negative externalities on the optimal quantity of consumption Consider the market for paper. Suppose that a paper factory dumps toxic waste into a nearby river, creating a negative externality for those living downstream from the factory. Producing an additional tonne of paper imposes a constant external cost of $105 per tonne. The following graph shows the demand (private value) curve and the supply (private cost) curve for paper. Use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the social cost curve when the external cost is $105 per tonne. (?) paper) PRICE (Dollars per tonne 700 630 560 490 420 350 280 210 140 70 0 0 ◇ 1 0 2 O 3 e O O The market equilibrium quantity is 3.5 O QUANTITY (Tonnes of paper) D Supply (Private Cost) Demand (Private Value) 7 Social Cost tonnes of paper, but the socially optimal quantity of paper production is 3 To create an incentive for the firm to produce the socially optimal quantity of paper, the government could impose a tax tonne of…
By imposing a tax on the production of electricity equal to the cost of acid rain, the government will cause electric utilities to internalize the externality. As a consequence, the cost of the acid rain will become a OA. social cost borne by the public, and the demand curve for electricity will shift down. OB. social cost borne by the public, and the demand curve for electricity will shift up. C. private cost borne by the utilities, and the supply curve for electricity will shift down. D. private cost borne by the utilities, and the supply curve for electricity will shift up. Question Viewer
Let Q be the quantity of natural gas in tons from fracking. Assume fracking imposes a negative externality of $24 per ton. The private demand for natural gas from fracking is P = 200 - 4Q while the private supply curve is P = 20 + 2Q. If the government imposes a $24 tax per ton of natural gas from fracking, what is the change in the total surplus from before to after the imposition of the tax? O -$672. O $48. O $672. -$48.
5. The marginal benefits (MB) and marginal damage costs (MD) for daily particulate air pollution in East St. Louis, Illinois are given in the following figure: $ per pound per day 2 MB MD 1 Pounds 1,000 2,000 per day a. What is the efficient level of pollution in pounds per day? Explain. b. If East St. Louis imposes an absolute ban on particulate pollution, how large would be the deadweight loss? (Be quantitative.) c. If instead of an absolute ban, the city levels a Pigouvian tax on polluters, how large should it be per pound per day to achieve efficiency? What will be the total revenues to the government? What will be the gain or loss to residents compared to the absolute ban? What will be the after tax gain or loss to polluters compared to the absolute ban? d. If instead of an absolute ban, the right to be free of pollution is given to the residents and they are allowed to bargain with the polluters, what level of pollution will Coase expect to be bargained between polluters and…
7.
2. Refer to Graph 10-1. Assume the externality is not internalised. What is the loss to society from the last unit of the good produced by the market? A. P3-P2 B. P2-P1 C. P3-P1 D. ZeroGraph 10-1 Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
1.) Consider the market for plastic grocery store bags. Suppose that demand for these bags is given by PD = 24 – QD and supply is given by PS = QS. These bags, after they are used, pile up in the streets and get stuck in trees, creating unattractive litter. This litter imposes a negative externality of $2 per plastic bag. a.) Compute the socially optimal quantity of plastic bags. b.) Compute the competitive equilibrium in the market for plastic bags. c.) Compute consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus in the market for plastic bags in this competitive equilibrium.
3. The effect of negative externalities on the optimal quantity of consumption Consider the market for steel. Suppose that a steel manufacturing plant dumps toxic waste into a nearby river, creating a negative externality for those living downstream from the plant. Producing an additional ton of steel imposes a constant external cost of $140 per ton. The following graph shows the demand (private value) curve and the supply (private cost) curve for steel. Use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the social cost curve when the external cost is $140 per ton. Sac Cont O Say Cet Demand P v QUANTITY (araf ste The market equilibrium quantity is tons of steel, but the socially optimal quantity of steel production is_ tons. To create an incentive for the firm to produce the socially optimal quantity of steel, the government could impose a ▼ of5 per ton of steel. d al anid