Three cases have been presented to your law office. In each case, your client believes the other party has breached the contract. Your clients wish to be discharged from the contracts with no duty to perform contractual duties. Case 1: Client ordered a brand new car from dealer. The car arrived, but was damaged in shipping, with large dents on the left and right sides. Case 2: Client contracted with Builder for Builder to construct a house. The contract specified that the front door and garage door would be painted red. The doors, however, are white. Case 3: Client contracted with Doctor to surgically repair client's right shoulder. Instead, Doctor mistakenly repaired client's left shoulder. In which case (or cases) will your client be discharged from the duty to perform? Cases 1 and 3 Cases 1 and 2 Your client will NOT be discharged from the duty to perform in any of the 3 cases. Cases 2 and 3

Three cases have been presented to your law office. In each case, your client believes the other party has breached the contract. Your clients wish to be discharged from the contracts with no duty to perform contractual duties. Case 1: Client ordered a brand new car from dealer. The car arrived, but was damaged in shipping, with large dents on the left and right sides. Case 2: Client contracted with Builder for Builder to construct a house. The contract specified that the front door and garage door would be painted red. The doors, however, are white. Case 3: Client contracted with Doctor to surgically repair client's right shoulder. Instead, Doctor mistakenly repaired client's left shoulder. In which case (or cases) will your client be discharged from the duty to perform? Cases 1 and 3 Cases 1 and 2 Your client will NOT be discharged from the duty to perform in any of the 3 cases. Cases 2 and 3

Similar questions

Case 5 P Corp, a retailer of women’s fashion accessories, contracted Sandra as their purchasing agent. The agency contract expressly stipulates that Sandra is not allowed to enter into contract in excess of $50,000.00 without first obtaining approval from P Corp. On a number of occasions, Sandra negotiated the purchase of quantities of costume jewellery from Z Inc for prices varying between $30,000 to $45,000.00. Recently, Sandra placed an order with Z Inc for goods at a price of $60,000.00 and without consulting P Corp. Z Inc did not question the order. Two weeks after, Z Inc received payment from P Corp. Sandra was reprimanded by P Corp and, again, reminded of her $50,000.00 limit. Despite the warning, Sandra placed another order of $55,000.00 from Z Inc. This time P Corp refuse to pay and demanded Z Inc to take back the goods. Issues: Is Sandra acting on actual or apparent authority? Is the principal bound by the action of the agent, Sandra? Please state your reasons
Alfred has been instructed to settle a property dispute between his client Greg and Greg’s neighbour Fatima. Greg is a pensioner who has been arguing with Fatima over their respective contributions to repairing the blocked drain which runs under both of their properties. The blockage is not affecting Fatima much, so she is reluctant to pay to have it rectified. Alfred attends a settlement negotiation at Fatima’s lawyer’s office in the CBD. Once discussions get underway, Alfred realises that Fatima’s solicitor (and apparently Fatima herself) is unaware of the fact that Greg’s beloved Leyland cypress tree has caused most of the damage to the shared drain. In fact the opposing solicitor begins her proposal: ‘Since the cause of the damage to the drain is unknown…,’ during which Alfred merely nods. Accordingly, a 50/50 split in the relevant payment for repairs is agreed, and a binding financial agreement is signed. Alfred initially considers this to be fair enough, since Greg is living on…
The statute of limitations in Texas is a.four years for a written contract. b.four years for an oral contract for a 6-month lease. c.four years for all contracts for the sale or lease of real property in Texas. d.six years for a written contract.
What is the term for a minor choosing to proceed with the contract and the term for a minor choosing to void the contract? Select one: tion O a. disaffirmance & ratification O b. acceptance & appeal O C. acceptance & denial O d. execution & dismissal
Live The Dream Ltd provides a limousine and driver hire service. All of the company’s clients sign the company’s standard contract. The contract includes a clause, within the standard terms and conditions, that states: ‘Live The Dream Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any financial loss, property damage or personal injury incurred during the hire period’. Leona hired a limousine and driver for her 40th birthday night out. She signed the standard contract which included the standard terms and conditions and paid £500, the full cost of the hire, in advance. When Leona was getting into the limousine at the start of her night out, the vehicle was nudged from behind by a passing car. As a result, the limousine rolled forward and ran over Leona’s foot. Leona’s foot was badly bruised and Leona was in too much pain to continue with her birthday night out. The other vehicle involved drove off, and all subsequent attempts to identify the vehicle and the driver failed. Live The Dream Ltd…
16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contract
Dorian breeds Scottish Fold kittens and informs Stevie that she is a cat breeder. Stevie says she is interested in purchasing one of her kittens. Dorian calls Stevie a month later and says Stevie’s kitten is ready for pickup and Stevie owes her $1,000. Stevie refuses, stating they did not have a valid contract. Dorian states they did have a valid contract. Who is correct?
Jack Tupp contracts to work for Iona Carr Autohaus during February for $1,800. On January 17, Iona Carr Autohaus wrongfully cancels the contract. Jack Tupp refuses to accept a similar job with another car dealership which would have paid him $1,650. If Jack Tupp sues Iona Carr Autohaus, how much in damages would he most likely recover?
A pizza parlor owner uses a vending machine company to service his soft drinks.The owner of the company sells his route to Mr X and delegates all of his contractsincluding the one with the pizza parlor. This enrages the pizza parlor owner, because Mr. X was engaged to the pizza parlor owner's sister and left her standing at the altar. He claims that the obligation is non-delegable because it's "personal". Do you agree
S insured his appliance store under an owner, landlords, and tenant’s policy that included products liability coverage. While he was demonstrating a microwave oven the door came open and injured a customer. Which of the following would protect S? The oven manufacture’s products liability policy The premises-operation section on S’s policy The products Liability section on S’s policy The incidental contracts section of S’s policy
Find a case involving an allegation of a breach of contract and include a brief summary of the facts, the court’s decision and reasoning, and whether one should agree with the court’s decision.
Ma3. Explain in brief. Sally Henderson is an employee of Good Eats Restaurant. Sally's contract with Good Eats Restaurant states: "Sally Henderson shall ensure the bathrooms and dining room area are reasonably clean during operating hours." Sally's good friend James is also employed by Good Eats Restaurant as a parking attendant, a person who parks customers’ cars. On a very busy night at Good Eats Restaurant, without the authorization of Good Eats Restaurant, Sally decided to help her friend James park cars. Sally injures a customer due to Sally's negligent driving while parking cars. The injured customer sues Sally and Good Eats Restaurant. Is it likely that Good Eats Restaurant will be determined to be liable to the injured customer. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN.