Alex and Ann enter a contract for Ann to cook a gourmet meal for Alex and Alex to pay Ann $50. Alex shows up at Ann's house with $50 and hands it to Ann. Ann refuses to accept the money. What has Alex done? Discharged his duties under the contract. Not yet performed his duties under the contract Substantially performed his duties. Breached the contract

Alex and Ann enter a contract for Ann to cook a gourmet meal for Alex and Alex to pay Ann $50. Alex shows up at Ann's house with $50 and hands it to Ann. Ann refuses to accept the money. What has Alex done? Discharged his duties under the contract. Not yet performed his duties under the contract Substantially performed his duties. Breached the contract

Similar questions

Martha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.
Harry, Beatrice, and Mallory are neighbors. They each have young children, and the three of them - Harry, Beatrice, and Mallory - decide to build a waterslide for their children to enjoy. They also agree to split the cost of fixing the waterslide if anything happens to it. Eventually, the slide breaks, and it will cost $180 to repair it. Beatrice proposes that they buy a new slide for $300. Harry agrees and they purchase it without speaking to Mallory. For how much of the cost is Mallory responsible? Ⓒ$100 O $0 $60 O $180 Ⓒ$300
Owe
Steve was hired to paint the outside of Denise's house for a price of $1500. Steve showed up everyday to paint and the job was completed in about three weeks. He told Denise he would come- to pick up his payment on Thursday. On Wednesday, Denise me py noticed that one of the spots on the back of the house needed to re-done because it looked messy. When Steve asked for payment Denise refused to pay him anything telling him that he did a messy job and he would have to sue her. Steve is entitled to payment under a theory of subjective contracts. Denise will win because Steve breached the contract. Steve is entitled to payment under a theory of substantial performance. Denise will win and not have to pay anything.
A. 1. X, Y, and Z, co-owners, sold a inverter air-condition unit to A. They solidarity bound themselves to deliver the aircon unit in March 30. Through the fault of Y, the aircon unit was completely destroyed . Give the rights and obligations of the parties. B. 1. Joe, Nicolas, and Dante obliged themselves jointly to deliver to Ricky a particular racing horse on April 1. Their agreement which was made known to Ricky is that they will contribute the amount in buying the particular horse. However, the horse was not delivered on the date due because of failure of Nicolas to give his share of the purchase price. State the rights and obligations of the parties. 2. Dindo binds himself to pay his P20,000 loan in four (4) equal monthly installments. Is the obligation of Dindo divisible or indivisible? C. 1. Jaevis promised to deliver to Kyle a breeding cow. Their contract contains a penal clause that in the case of non-fulfillment, Jaevis Shall pay a penalty of P10,000. Jaevis wants to juts…
Karen's elderly Uncle Joe gave her written authority to sell the family house. Uncle Joe lived in Maine and Karen lived in Minnesota. After about two months Karen found a buyer for the house and signed an acceptance of the offer on July 21. Later that same day she learned that Uncle Joe had died the day before (July 20). Other members of the family did not want the family house sold and claimed that t acceptance Karen signed was void because Uncle Joe had died prior to acceptance. The buyer of the house claims Karen had the legal authority to sell the house and that the contract is binding. Who is right? Please explain.
Max and Jack enter into a contract which states: "Jack will paint Max's kitchen blue and Max promises to pay Jack $200 upon completion." Which is an example of an implied condition? That Max will pay Jack upon completion of the painting. That Jack will use blue paint when painting Max's kitchen. That Max will allow Jack access to his kitchen That Max will pay Jack $200.
Raymond owns a bakery on main street that specializes in making custom cookies for special events. He has twenty years of baking and cookie decorating experience and has received numerous awards for his work. Clarice enters the bakery on morning to inquire about Raymond baking some cookies for her daughter’s birthday. The two enter into a contract in which Raymond agrees to bake two dozen cookies and decorate the cookies as characters from Clarice’s daughter’s favorite show. In their discussions, Raymond tells Clarice the cookies will be ‘approximately half a pound each’ in size. As they are in America, Clarice assumes that the half a pound size refers to the weight of the cookies, knowing that the size will vary as each cookie bakes slightly differently. Raymond, however, meant the half a pound size to signify that the cookies will be the size of a half-pound sterling, the primary currency in the United Kingdom. This measurement is significantly smaller than the half a pound in…
A minor enters into a contract for the purchase of certain necessaries , in such case Question 8Answer a. he is liable to pay b. his guardian is liable to pay. c. he is not personally liable to pay d. his estate is liable to pay
George develops upper- and middle-income townhouses and condo flats. He hired Pommella as his agent to sell the flat. Pommella is engaged on a fixed-term contract and is paid a predetermined salary plus commission according on the number of flats she sells. George is considering ending the agency relationship with Pomella. Explain to him THREE (3) options to end the relationship lawfully under agency law.
Dennis and Donna Smith owned a 10-acre tract of land that they decided to sell. The couple entered into a listing agreement with Kelly McLaughlin, a licensed real estate broker. The agreement gave Kelly the exclusive right to sell the property for a period of 6 months. The Smiths agreed to pay Kelly a 6% commission of the selling price if a buyer was found during the listing period. Four months later, the Smiths sent Kelly a letter terminating the listing agreement. Kelly did not approve of the conditions. One month later, Kelly presented a full price offer to the Smiths; however, they ignored the offer and sold the property to another buyer. Kelly sued the Smiths for breach of the agency agreement. Which party wins the lawsuit? Did the Smiths act ethically in this case?
Dimitri lends his brother, Calvin, $1,800. Calvin and Willa agree that Calvin will build a new pool deck for Willa in exchange for Willa paying Dimitri $1,800. Calvin builds the pool deck, but Willa refuses to pay Dimitri any money. Can Dimitri sue for payment? O No, because Dimitri was not a party to the contract. O No. because Dimitri did not build the pool deck. O Yes, because Dimitri is a donee beneficiary. O No, because Dimitri is an incidental beneficiary. Yes, because Dimitri is a creditor beneficiary.