With reference to contract law terms: a) Define exclusion clauses and what their effect is. b) With reference to case law explain under what circumstances an exclusion clause will be incorporated into a contract. c) What type of liability cannot be excluded by exclusion clauses and would render them automatically void? Reference can be made to UCTA 1977 and Consumer Rights Act 2015

With reference to contract law terms: a) Define exclusion clauses and what their effect is. b) With reference to case law explain under what circumstances an exclusion clause will be incorporated into a contract. c) What type of liability cannot be excluded by exclusion clauses and would render them automatically void? Reference can be made to UCTA 1977 and Consumer Rights Act 2015

Similar questions

dd
The accidental baker Mamello Morongwe, a certified food technologist was working on a biscuit recipe for her employer, a leading biscuit manufacturer, when she discovered a muffin recipe. The employer expressed no interest in pursuing this segment of the market and gave Mamello the clearance to use the recipe in her private capacity for personal benefit, as part of their employee development program. After utilising this recipe to bake muffins for special events only, which she distributed over weekends, Mamello finally resigned from her job and is now pursuing her business on a full-time basis – her former employer is now a customer and has placed a full-year weekly order for 20 dozens of muffins every Friday. Armed with a business plan and registration documents for her business, Muffin Boffin, Mamello feels ready to take the country by storm. Q.1 . Explain below categories of inventory that are likely to be found at Muffin Boffin. Use practical examples relevant to their…
(a) Covid-19 has struck businesses resulting in many companies undergoing either financial difficulties or delays in providing services. Crystal Ltd is a construction company that was unable to complete it's project on time due to the frequent movement restrictions imposed by the government. Their customers would like to sue them in court, but Crystal Ltd is trying to persuade them settle the matter using the alternative dispute resolution method instead. Illustrate the following to convince the customers that considering alternative dispute resolution to resolve conflict is indeed a good strategy. (i) The of alternative dispute resolution that exist and exact type that would be most types suitable to address this matter. (ii) Atleast five (5) advantages of using alternative dispute resolution in comparison to the court process. (b) Identify a country of choice and briefly compare that country's court structure to that of the Malaysian Court structure.
Explain briefly , substantive and emotional conflict with their consequences
1. Legal viability (in terms of norms and values and regulations)
Which of the following health policy provisions states that the producer does NOT have the authority to change the policy or wave any of its provisions? O A Time Limit on Certain Defenses OB. OC OD. Reinstatement Entire Contract Change of Beneficiary MM QUATE Ahiler 372-256-906
Discuss it in the term of... issues law application conclusions
The Contract Act, 1960 (Act 25) has made significant inroads in the rules governing frustration at common law. do you agree?
Five (5) practical situations when to apply knowledge in intellectual property, copy right, and fair use guidelines.
The main sources of sport law in the Caribbean include: Question 14Answer a. Contract, tort and statutory law b. Equity, common law, statutory law , criminal and civil law c. Equity and common law d. Common law and Statutory law
Webster v. Blue Ship Tearoom. Can you think of other situations today for which this case might serve as legal precedent? PRISCILLA D. WEBSTER V. BLUE SHIP TEA ROOM, INC. SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS FACTS: Priscilla Webster, a restaurant patron who ordered seafood chowder and choked on a fishbone, brought this case. She maintained that she would not have reasonably expected to find a bone in the chowder. As a result of the bone in the chowder, Webster suffered through several hospital procedures to remove the bone, at considerable cost and pain. At the trial, a jury found for Webster. The Blue Ship Tea Room, the defendant, appealed the case on the basis of the legal interpretation of the implied warranty of merchantability. The appellate decision has become a classic in American jurisprudential reasoning. REASONING: The court, in great detail, discussed the rich culinary history of New England seafood chowders. In going through the details of exactly how good chowder is…
Business law dis