Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Business Law
in Adel v Greensprings of Vermont, the case in the text involving the plaintiff receiving Legionnaire's Disease from water at a ski resort, the court held that Multiple Choice since water is considered a good under the UCC, the warranty of merchantability shoul water ot a good under the UCC and therefore th water though a good under the UCC, does not get the protections of wananses due to its fuidity and where it comes from although weter is a good under the UCC, there is way to determine for sure that the plaines injuries resulted from the ski resort the UCC does not consider weter as a tangible good because there is no one supplier of water

in Adel v Greensprings of Vermont, the case in the text involving the plaintiff receiving Legionnaire's Disease from water at a ski resort, the court held that Multiple Choice since water is considered a good under the UCC, the warranty of merchantability shoul water ot a good under the UCC and therefore th water though a good under the UCC, does not get the protections of wananses due to its fuidity and where it comes from although weter is a good under the UCC, there is way to determine for sure that the plaines injuries resulted from the ski resort the UCC does not consider weter as a tangible good because there is no one supplier of water

icon
Related questions
Question

dd

In Adel v. Greensprings of Vermont, the case in the text involving the plaintiff receiving Legionnaire's Disease from water at a ski resort, the court held that Multiple Choice since water is considered a good under the UCC, the warranty of merchantability should apply to a case water is not a good under the UCC and therefore there can be no warranties water, though a good under the UCC does not get the protections of warranties due to its fluidity and where it comes from although weter is a good under the UCC, there is no way to determine for sure that the plaintiff's injuries resulted from the ski resort the UCC does not consider weter as a tangible good because there is no one supplier of water
Transcribed Image Text:In Adel v. Greensprings of Vermont, the case in the text involving the plaintiff receiving Legionnaire's Disease from water at a ski resort, the court held that Multiple Choice since water is considered a good under the UCC, the warranty of merchantability should apply to a case water is not a good under the UCC and therefore there can be no warranties water, though a good under the UCC does not get the protections of warranties due to its fluidity and where it comes from although weter is a good under the UCC, there is no way to determine for sure that the plaintiff's injuries resulted from the ski resort the UCC does not consider weter as a tangible good because there is no one supplier of water
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer