Spritz signs a contract that says that she will paint a mural of her friend Hecuba in exchange for Hecuba giving Spritz the secret recipe to Hecuba's beloved banana sushi. Spritz labors day and night painting the mural, however when she finally finishes and asks for the recipe, Hecuba laughs and points to an area of the contract which has extremely fine print (only legible to people with magnifying glasses). This incredibly small print says that Spritz must also paint 40 murals of Hecuba all around the city before getting the recipe. Even though Spritz knows that she has signed this document with a level head, she sues. Does she have a case against Hecuba? O Yes, and Hecuba will probably have to personally scrub away the first mural as punitive damage. Yes, a reasonable person would have missed the fine print. O No, because she already painted the first mural. O Yes, a reasonable person could not paint 40 murals. O No, Spritz's signature on the document created a legally binding, incontrovertible assumption that Spritz has agreed to everything in that document.
Spritz signs a contract that says that she will paint a mural of her friend Hecuba in exchange for Hecuba giving Spritz the secret recipe to Hecuba's beloved banana sushi. Spritz labors day and night painting the mural, however when she finally finishes and asks for the recipe, Hecuba laughs and points to an area of the contract which has extremely fine print (only legible to people with magnifying glasses). This incredibly small print says that Spritz must also paint 40 murals of Hecuba all around the city before getting the recipe. Even though Spritz knows that she has signed this document with a level head, she sues. Does she have a case against Hecuba? O Yes, and Hecuba will probably have to personally scrub away the first mural as punitive damage. Yes, a reasonable person would have missed the fine print. O No, because she already painted the first mural. O Yes, a reasonable person could not paint 40 murals. O No, Spritz's signature on the document created a legally binding, incontrovertible assumption that Spritz has agreed to everything in that document.
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:**Scenario: Contract Dispute Case Study**
Spritz signs a contract stating that she will paint a mural of her friend Hecuba in exchange for Hecuba giving Spritz the secret recipe to Hecuba's beloved banana sushi. Spritz labors day and night painting the mural. However, when she finally finishes and asks for the recipe, Hecuba laughs and points to an area of the contract with extremely fine print (only legible to people with magnifying glasses). This incredibly small print states that Spritz must also paint 40 murals of Hecuba all around the city before receiving the recipe. Despite knowing she signed the document with a level head, Spritz sues. Does she have a case against Hecuba?
**Options for Consideration:**
- Yes, and Hecuba will probably have to personally scrub away the first mural as punitive damage.
- Yes, a reasonable person would have missed the fine print.
- No, because she already painted the first mural.
- Yes, a reasonable person could not paint 40 murals.
- No, Spritz's signature on the document created a legally binding, incontrovertible assumption that Spritz has agreed to everything in that document.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
