Space limitations in the design of an aircraft limit the wall thickness of an aluminum torsion member to 2.0 mm for the top half of the cross section. For simplicity, a constant-thickness tube with mean diameter D = 40 mm is proposed (Figure P6.41a). In an attempt to increase the design torque and torsional stiffness by 30% each, the design is modified such that the bottom half of the circumference has a wall thickness of 4.0 mm (Figure P6.41b). The maximum allowable shear stress is 60 MPa. a. Compare the allowable torques and the stiffnesses for the two designs. b. Compare the shear stress in the 2-mm and 4-mm sections for the design in Figure P6.41b. c. Which cross section would you recommend? Why?

Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
icon
Related questions
Question
Space limitations in the design of an aircraft limit the
wall thickness of an aluminum torsion member to 2.0
mm for the top half of the cross section. For
simplicity, a constant-thickness tube with mean
diameter D = 40 mm is proposed (Figure P6.41a). In
an attempt to increase the design torque and
torsional stiffness by 30% each, the design is
modified such that the bottom half of the
circumference has a wall thickness of 4.0 mm
(Figure P6.41b). The maximum allowable shear
stress is 60 MPa.
a. Compare the allowable torques and the
stiffnesses for the two designs.
b. Compare the shear stress in the 2-mm
and 4-mm sections for the design in
Figure P6.41b.
c. Which cross section would you
recommend? Why?
FIGURE P6.41a
2 mm
FIGURE P6.41b
2 mm
4 mm
40 mm
40 mm
Transcribed Image Text:Space limitations in the design of an aircraft limit the wall thickness of an aluminum torsion member to 2.0 mm for the top half of the cross section. For simplicity, a constant-thickness tube with mean diameter D = 40 mm is proposed (Figure P6.41a). In an attempt to increase the design torque and torsional stiffness by 30% each, the design is modified such that the bottom half of the circumference has a wall thickness of 4.0 mm (Figure P6.41b). The maximum allowable shear stress is 60 MPa. a. Compare the allowable torques and the stiffnesses for the two designs. b. Compare the shear stress in the 2-mm and 4-mm sections for the design in Figure P6.41b. c. Which cross section would you recommend? Why? FIGURE P6.41a 2 mm FIGURE P6.41b 2 mm 4 mm 40 mm 40 mm
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Axial Load
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, mechanical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY