So to maximize profit, you want to make sure that your customers buy as many concessions as possible. You decide a bundling scheme is a good option to explore. You currently charge $6 for popcorn and $3 for candy. Market research reports show that customers who buy popcorn tend to also buy a drink. However, customers who buy popcorn tend not to buy candy and vice versa. People buy one or the other, but not both. Your plan, then, is to bundle popcorn and candy together at a discounted price to try to change the consumer behavior from buying one or the other to buying both. The question, as usual, is what price to charge to maximize demand as well as profit. Based on price discrimination and peak-load pricing, you can expect an average of 3,220 moviegoers a month. Suppose these customers are split into four groups, as follows: Group P: only buys popcorn (750 visits) Group C: only buys candy (750 visits) Group PC: buys both (420 visits) Group N: buys neither (1,300 visits) You consider offering a bundle of 1 popcorn + 1 candy for $7.00. The marginal cost of candy is $0.50, and the marginal cost of popcorn is $1.00. Calculate the following bundling scenarios to figure out if you should employ this pricing scheme or not.

So to maximize profit, you want to make sure that your customers buy as many concessions as possible. You decide a bundling scheme is a good option to explore. You currently charge $6 for popcorn and $3 for candy. Market research reports show that customers who buy popcorn tend to also buy a drink. However, customers who buy popcorn tend not to buy candy and vice versa. People buy one or the other, but not both. Your plan, then, is to bundle popcorn and candy together at a discounted price to try to change the consumer behavior from buying one or the other to buying both. The question, as usual, is what price to charge to maximize demand as well as profit. Based on price discrimination and peak-load pricing, you can expect an average of 3,220 moviegoers a month. Suppose these customers are split into four groups, as follows: Group P: only buys popcorn (750 visits) Group C: only buys candy (750 visits) Group PC: buys both (420 visits) Group N: buys neither (1,300 visits) You consider offering a bundle of 1 popcorn + 1 candy for $7.00. The marginal cost of candy is $0.50, and the marginal cost of popcorn is $1.00. Calculate the following bundling scenarios to figure out if you should employ this pricing scheme or not.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which restrictive practice is an example of bundling? None of the choices are correct. Retailers sell an electric grill at a price of $5, significantly undercutting the market. A unique supermarket chain sells only its self-branded products. A supermarket offers a free pack of hot dog buns with a purchase of hot dogs for the Fourth of July. A mobile phone manufacturer requires all retailers to sell its new phone at a price of at least $299.
Cathy sells hand sanitizers in a small town. Daily sanitizer demand equal Q(P)=300-25P Where Q is the market output and p is market price Cost of bottling and distributing is C(q)=4q Suppose cathy is the only seller of sanitizer, what price should cathy charge? What profit does she earn? Suppose dom also produces hand sanitizer in town, and cathy and domm both simultaneously choose price of hand sanitizer, consumers have perfect information. Derive the reaction functions for cathy and domm What is the Nash equilibrium for this market?
If United Airlines acted as a "price leader" and all other airlines simply charged the same prices that United Airlines charged, then the Anti-Trust Department might consider this illegal because it is a form of "silent collusion." Multiple Choice The U.S. Anti-Trust Department has always considered "silent collusion" as suspicious and it does consider this pricing strategy to be illegal. There is no such term as "silent collusion" in microeconomics. Matching the prices of the price leader is a good example of a competitive market. The famous 1982 anti-monopoly IBM court case said that this pricing strategy within an industry is legal as long as the firms fill out quarterly reports to keep the U.S. Anti-Trust Department informed.
Question 2 Consider a Cournot duopoly, the firms face an (inverse) demand function: Pb=268-10Qb. The marginal cost for firm 1 is given by mc1= 6Q The marginal cost for firm 2 is given by mc2=4Q (Assume firm 1 has a fixed cost of $102 and firm 2 had a fixed cost of $104 What are the profits of firm 2? (hint 567.26) How much consumer surplus is created by industry transactions? (hint 1333.34) Full explain this question and text typing work only We should answer our question within 2 hours takes more time then we will reduce Rating Dont ignore this line ...
You have three tickets to a Celtics game on a night that you are going to be out of town (so the value of unsold tickets is zero to you). There are only four possible buyers of a Celtics ticket. The table below lists the respective reservation prices of these four possible buyers: Customer Reservation Price 1 $25 2 $35 3 $50 4 $60 You consider inviting bids using an English auction to sell your tickets. How much total revenue can you generate using the English auction mechanism from the sale of the three tickets? [Bids can be made in increments of $1.00]
Which of the following methods could a cartel NOT use to prevent its member fırms from breaking their agreements? If a member fırm breaks its agreement, it is a breach of contract and the firm is subject to legal penalties. The cartel acts as a monopolist, maximizing the combined profits of all the member firms. All of the other choices could be used to prevent member firms from breaking agreements. The cartel requires member firms to structure executive pay in such a way that the executives benefit personally from preserving the cartel. If a member firm breaks its agreement, that firm is kicked out of the cartel permanently and can no longer earn cartel profits in the future.
Suppose Mattel, the producer of Barble dolls and accessorles (sold separately), has two types of consumers who purchase Its dolls: low-value consumers and high-value consumers. Each of the low-value consumers tends to purchase one doll and one accessory, with a total willingness to pay of $44. Each of the high-value consumers buys one doll and two accessorles and Is willing to pay $82 In total. Mattel Is currently considering two pricing strategles: • Strategy 1: Sell each doll for $22 and each accessory for $22 • Strategy 2: Sell each doll for $6 and each accessory for $38 In the following table, Indicate the revenue for a low-value and a high-value customer under strategy I and strategy 2. Then, assuming each strategy is applied to one low-value and one high-value customer, indicate the total revenue for each strategy. Revenue from Low-Value Revenue from High-Value Total Revenue from Customers Customers Strategy $44 Value, 1 Accessory S82 Value, 2 Accessories (s) ($) (s) Strategy 1…
Imagine that you are the manager of a large clothing company with market power that specializes in selling blue jean pants. 1) Choose two pricing strategies that were discussed in Chapter (Pricing Strategies for Firms with Market Power) that you would implement as the firm manager. 2) Explain how exactly you would implement these two pricing strategies in the real-world
Tying as a Bundling Strategy Ginnie's Gym Refreshment Bar Hydration Power Drink Satisfying Smoothie Early 7.00 5.00 Late 6.00 10.00 Ginnie has observed that her signature item, the Satisfying Smoothie, is very popular with the late evening crowd at the gym, but it is not so popular with the early crowd. The early and late crowds have only slightly different preferences for her Hydration Power Drink. The gym has a very large clientele, and Ginnie can’t always tell who has the late-crowd preference and who has the early-crowd preference. In her graduate MBA class, they have been studying tying as a bundling strategy. Ginnie asked her professor, “Would bundling work for my business?” Her professor said, “I think you told me that the marginal costs for you two products differ significantly, so first, I would recommend that you look at the contribution margin for each. Sometimes, low prices may be more profitable and sometimes high prices will be…
QUESTION 2 Uber provides point to point car transport services in Brisbane. The typical Uber service is called UberX. Uber also offers a service called UberSelect, a premium service that uses expense, newer cars. UberSelect costs approximately 40% more for customers than UberX. Which of the following statements are true: UberSelect is an example of third degree price discrimination. UberSelect is an example of using peak load pricing. Charging the same price for UberX and UberSelect would give Uber greater profits. The decision to charge customers more for UberSelect is a result of their demand being more elastic than UberX customers.
An incumbent firm supplies a consumer by writing a contract in period 1 for delivery in period 2. The contract stipulates a price of $700 and a breach of fee of $500. The consumer values the good at $1000 and the incumbent’s cost equals $400. A potential entrant firm has uniformly distributed costs [0, 800]. If the entrant enters, there is Bertrand price competition. How much additional profit does the incumbent make because of the contract? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.