The Chain Store Paradox A monopolist (Player A) has branches in 20 different cities. He faces 20 potential competitors, one in each city. The competitors can – in sequential order – choose in or out. They do so one at a time. If a potential competitor chooses out, she receives a payoff of 1, while A receives a payoff of 5. If the competitor chooses in, she will receive a payoff of either 2 or 0, depending on the response of Player A to her action. Player A, in response to a choice of in, must choose one of two pricing strategies, cooperative or aggressive. If he chooses cooperative, both player A and the competitor receive a payoff of 2, and if A chooses aggressive, each player receives a payoff of 0. After this, the competitor in the next city will choose in or out, etc. Explain the game-theoretic solution of this game. Would you expect the given solution to happen in real life? Why or why not?

The Chain Store Paradox A monopolist (Player A) has branches in 20 different cities. He faces 20 potential competitors, one in each city. The competitors can – in sequential order – choose in or out. They do so one at a time. If a potential competitor chooses out, she receives a payoff of 1, while A receives a payoff of 5. If the competitor chooses in, she will receive a payoff of either 2 or 0, depending on the response of Player A to her action. Player A, in response to a choice of in, must choose one of two pricing strategies, cooperative or aggressive. If he chooses cooperative, both player A and the competitor receive a payoff of 2, and if A chooses aggressive, each player receives a payoff of 0. After this, the competitor in the next city will choose in or out, etc. Explain the game-theoretic solution of this game. Would you expect the given solution to happen in real life? Why or why not?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
Microsoft and a smaller rival often have to select from one of two competing technologies, A and B. The rival always prefers to select the same technology as Microsoft (because compatibility is important), while Microsoft always wants to select a different technology from its rival. If the two companies select different technologies, Microsoft's payoff is 6 units of utility, while the small rival suffers a loss of utility of 2. If the two companies select the same technology, Microsoft suffers a loss of utility of 2 while the rival gains 2 units of utility. Using the given information, fill in the payoffs for each cell in the matrix, assuming that each company chooses its technology simultaneously. Microsoft Technology A Technology B Rival Technology A Rival: , Microsoft Rival: , Microsoft Technology B Rival: , Microsoft Rival: , Microsoft True or False: There is no equilibrium in pure strategies. True False Note:- Do not provide handwritten…
Olivia is thinking about opening a new bakery (the entrant). There is already a bakery open in her neighborhood (the incumbent), and the owner of the incumbent bakery makes it clear that if Olivia enters the market, they will cut their prices in an attempt to drive the new bakery out of business. Based on the payoff matrix below, is the incumbent’s threat credible? That is, if Olivia opens a new bakery, will the incumbent actually lower their prices? Note: the entrant chooses the row, the incumbent chooses the column High price Low price Enter 1, 2 -1, 1 Don’t enter 0, 10 0, 1 a. Yes, the threat is credible b. No, the threat is not credible
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $30 million, $20 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. O True Small Budget $70 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. O False True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
The Government of Malaca has decided to sell pollution permits that will allow people to discharge pollutants into its largest freshwater lake. Each permit represents the right to discharge one tonne of pollutants. Malaca has determined that the lake will tolerate a maximum of 10 tonnes of pollutants per year and has decided to sell the permits using a Dutch auction. This means that the auction starts at a very high price, which is reduced in steps until the price reaches a level that will result in all 10 tonnes of pollution permits being sold at the same price. The results of the bidding are shown in table below. Price per Pollution Bidder Bidder Bidder Bidder Bidder Permit A. B D $5, 500 1 5,000 4,500 4,000 1. 1. 1 2 2. 3 2 1 2 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 4 3 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 1,500 7 a. What will be the price of pollution permits as a result of this auction? Price: $ b. Suppose that Bidder E happened to be an environmental protection group. If this group had not participated in the…
Which of the following is true of a prisoneros dilemma game? It does not have an equilibrium. It has a dominant-strategy equilibrium. It does not have a Nash equilibrium. It ensures better payoffs to the players compared to other games.
AP CollegeBoard Test Booklet Unit 4 Problem Set Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, in explaining your answers. A correctly labeled diagram must have all axes and curves clearly labeled and must show directional changes. If the question prompts you to “Calculate," you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Use the graph provided below to answer parts (a)-(e). Marginal Cost Average Total Cost Average Variable Cost 108 100 55 Demand 0 10 21 31 44 57 77 Quantity Marginal Revenue BigMed, a profit-maximizing firm, has a patent on a medical device, making it the only producer of that device. The graph above shows BigMed's demand, marginal revenue, average total cost, average variable cost, and marginal cost curves. (a) Calculate BigMed's total revenue if the firm produces the allocatively efficient quantity. Show your work. (b) Starting at a price of $100, if BigMed were to increase the price by 2%, will the quantity demanded decrease by more than 2%, by less…
Problem # 4 Idea Inc. is a small publishing company operating in the college and textbook market, which is one of the most profitable segments for book publishers. Idea Inc. has a cost of producing, handling, and shipping of about $30 for each additional book. The publisher’s overall marketing and promotion spending (set annually) accounts for an average cost of about $10 per book. Idea Inc.’s best-selling game theory text has a demand curve: P = 200 - Q, where Q denotes yearly sales (in thousands) of books. For this text Idea Inc. pays a $10 per book royalty to the author. a) Determine the profit-maximizing output and price for the game theory text. b) A rival publisher has raised the price of its best-selling game theory text by $20. One option is to exactly match this price hike and so exactly preserve your level of sales. Do you endorse this price increase? (Explain briefly why or why not.) c) To save significantly on fixed costs, Idea Inc. plans to contract out the actual printing…
Problem 4: Consider an infinitely repeated game, where the base game is the following 2-person 2x2 game: A A 0,0 10, 10 S1: choose A always S2: choose B always B 10, 10 0,0 Assume both players discount the future at the same rate of r, 0 < r < 1. Limiting each player's strategies to the following six possibilities, S3: Choose A then mimic the other player's previous choice S4: Choose B, then mimic the other player's previous choice S5: Choose A, then choose the opposite of the other player's previous choice S6: Choose B, then choose the opposite of the other player's previous choice a. present the strategic form of this game, b. identify all pure-strategy Nash equilibria c. does repetition with these strategies "solve" the coordination dilemma that confronts the players in the single play of the above game.
please if you can teach explain
part ii-viii