payoffs are different from the original question.Voter 3 votes for AVoter 1□ (A,A,A)(A, A, B)(A, B, A)(A, B, B)O (B,A,A)(B, A, B)Which of the following strategy profiles are Nash equilibria?(B,B,A)AB(B, B, B)Voter 2None of above.A0, 1, 00, 1, 0The payoffs are given in the tables below. Note that theseB0, 1,01, 0, 1Voter 1Voter 3 votes for BABVoter 2A0, 1,01, 0, 1B1, 0, 11, 0, 1

Nash equilibrium in game theory represents a stable game situation in which neither of the players…

payoffs are different from the original question. Voter 3 votes for A Voter 1 Voter 2 A B The payoffs are given in the tables below. Note that these A 0, 1, 0 0, 1, 0 B 0, 1, 0 1, 0, 1 Which of the following strategy profiles are Nash equilibria? Voter 1 Voter 3 votes for B A B Voter 2 A 0, 1, 0 1, 0, 1 B 1, 0, 1 1, 0, 1

payoffs are different from the original question. Voter 3 votes for A Voter 1 Voter 2 A B The payoffs are given in the tables below. Note that these A 0, 1, 0 0, 1, 0 B 0, 1, 0 1, 0, 1 Which of the following strategy profiles are Nash equilibria? Voter 1 Voter 3 votes for B A B Voter 2 A 0, 1, 0 1, 0, 1 B 1, 0, 1 1, 0, 1

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Evaluate this statement All Nash equilibra are dominant strategy equilibria but not all dominant strategy equilibria are Nash Equilibria
Consider the following three-player game represented in extensive form: Player 3 L Player 2 Player 1 R Player 2 U D Player 3 (0,2,0) U D U D (0, 1, 1) (0, 3, k) (0, 4, 3) (0,4,2) U D How many pure-strategy subgame-perfect Nash equilibria are there in this game if k > 1? 5 3 7 1 It depends on the value of k. (2,2, 0)
O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the above
Economics Consider an infinitely repeated game played between two firms with the following payoffs (firm 1 is listed first): · (250, 290) if both firms deviate · (290, 330) if both firms cooperate · (230, 370) if only firm 2 deviates · (350, 270) if only firm 1 deviates a. What probability-adjusted discount factor would ensure that Firm 1 would cooperate in a Nash equilibrium if Firm 2 applied a trigger strategy in the event that Firm 1 deviated? b. What probability-adjusted discount factor would ensure that Firm 2 would cooperate in a Nash equilibrium if Firm 1 applied a trigger strategy in the event that Firm 2 deviated?
The following payoff matrix shows the possible sentence that two suspects , who are arrested on suspicion on car threft,could recieve. The suspects are intarogated seperately and are unable to communicate with one another. For the information given in the payoff matrix above: a. Is there a dominant strategy. b. What is the dominant strategy? How do you know? c. Is there a Nash equilibirium ? How do you know?
The count is three balls and two strikes, and the bases are empty. The batter wants to maximize the probability of getting a hit or a walk, while the pitcher wants to minimize this probability. The pitcher has to decide whether to throw a fast ball or a curve ball, while the batter has to decide whether to prepare for a fast ball or a curve ball. The strategic form of this game is shown here. Find all Nash equilibria in mixed strategies.
2. For the following payoff matrix find all of the mixed strategy Nash equilibria (check for dominated strategies to eliminate). Player 1 X Y Z A 1,3 4,1 2,3 Player 2 B 2,4 3,1 0,0 C 2,3 5,0 4,2
Problem 2. Consider the partnership-game we discussed in Lecture 3 (pages 81-87 of the textbook). Now change the setup of the game so that player 1 chooses x = [0, 4], and after observing the choice of x, player 2 chooses y ≤ [0, 4]. The payoffs are the same as before. (a) Find all SPNE (subgame perfect Nash equilibria) in pure strategies. (b) Can you find a Nash equilibrium, with player 1 choosing x = 1, that is not subgame perfect? Explain.
For the game below, find all mixed-strategy Nash equilibria.
the Consider a simultaneous-move integer game between two players: Marilyn and Noah. Each of player is required to announce a positive integer between 1 to 4. In other words, a player can announce 1, 2, 3, or 4. Two players announce their integers simultaneously. Notice that this game is different from the games we learned in class in that each player has four actions to take. The payoffs of the players in the game are specified as follows: (1) when the two announced integers are different, whoever reports the lower number pays $1 to the other player, so that the loser of the game has payoff -1 and the winner of the game has payoff 1; (2) when the two players announce the same integer, their payoffs are both O. What is Marilyn's maximin strategy? 01 02 03 O
Consider the following simultaneous game. a. b. C. d. Player 1 U Player 2 L 8,8 3,0 R 3,3 8,3 What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria? Identify. Find whether there are any mixed-strategy equilibria. Assume now the game above is being modified as a sequential game where player 1 would move first and player 2 second. Find all Nash and subgame perfect equilibria for the game. Would a Nash equilibrium always be Pareto efficient? Use your answer in (a) to explain.
1.a) If the three executives of a fraudulent organization report nothing to the authorities, each gets a payoff of 100. If at least one of them blows the whistle, then those who reported the fraud get 28, while those who didn’t get -100. Suppose they play a symmetric mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium where each is silent (does not report fraud) with probability p. What is p?A, 0.1B, 0.28C, 0.5D, 0.8 b) In a two-player game, with strategies and (some known and some unknown) payoffs as shown below, suppose a mixed-strategy equilibrium exists where 1 plays C with probability 3/4, and Player 2 randomizes over X, Y, and Z with equal probabilities. What are the pure-strategy equilibria of this game? A, (A, Y) and (B, X)B, (A, Z) and (C, Y)C, (B, X) and (C, X)D, (C, X) and (C, Y)