Sam, a mid-level manager at his company, continually makes offensive remarks and gestures toward Susan, a non-manager at the company who works in another department. Susan quits her job and brings a lawsuit for sexual harassment. As a general rule under California law, the company Group of answer choices a. is strictly liable to pay general damages for the sexually harassing acts of its managers. b. is not liable if Susan complained about the problem and the company took no corrective action. c. is liable for punitive damages even if senior management had not been made aware of the problem. d. none of the above.

Sam, a mid-level manager at his company, continually makes offensive remarks and gestures toward Susan, a non-manager at the company who works in another department. Susan quits her job and brings a lawsuit for sexual harassment. As a general rule under California law, the company Group of answer choices a. is strictly liable to pay general damages for the sexually harassing acts of its managers. b. is not liable if Susan complained about the problem and the company took no corrective action. c. is liable for punitive damages even if senior management had not been made aware of the problem. d. none of the above.

Similar questions

East Coast Waffles, Inc., an Atlanta-based company which owns and operates more than 100 Waffle House restaurants in Florida and Virginia, fired an employee who claimed that his fellow servers at a Tampa Florida Waffle House were harassing several customers because of their race. The employee that was fired did not claim "whistleblower" status, the employee simply claimed that such action was improper.Is this permitted (firing the employee who reported the actions of the others) under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?Post at least a 125 word discussion and respond to at least 2 of your colleagues' postings. Support your discussion with at least 1 Internet citation in APA style.
Carla is a police officer and a first-generation immigrant. She was assigned to work at a local casino. Carla liked the work and suggested to her brother (in her country of origin) that he come to the United States and work with her to learn English more fluently. The casino rejected his application because of his choppy English. How would you analyze the Immigration Reform and Control Act regarding the casino not hiring Carla's brother because of his choppy English?
A tort is a breach of a contractual agreement Select one: True False Clear my choice O O
Darnell decides not to hire Mary for the information technology position because he thinks women are unsuited for computing. Darnell is displaying prejudice against Mary. Why? I think the answer should be discrimination since "not to hire Mary" is an action. Why the textbook shows the answer is prejudice? Thank you very much!
Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees on the basis of their age once an employee has reached age 45. Group startsTrue or False True, unselectedFalse, unselected
Spotlight on Dress Code Policies—DiscriminationBased on Gender. Burlington Coat FactoryWarehouse, Inc., had a dress code that required malesalesclerks to wear business attire consisting of slacks,shirt, and a necktie. Female salesclerks, by contrast,were required to wear a smock so that customers could readilyidentify them. Karen O’Donnell and other female employeesrefused to wear smocks. Instead they reported to work in businessattire and were suspended. After numerous suspensions, thefemale employees were fired for violating Burlington’s dress codepolicy. All other conditions of employment, including salary,hours, and benefits, were the same for female and male employees. Was the dress code policy discriminatory? Why or why not?[O’Donnell v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., 656 F.Supp.263 (S.D. Ohio 1987)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.)
Which law protects Xiuying, as introduced in the Chapter 16 case "Hello, My Name Is", from job discrimination based on race, color, gender, religion, or national origin? A. the Equal Employment Opportunity Act B. the Civil Rights Act (and its amendments) C. the Equal Rights Amendment D. the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Michael Hauck claimed that he was discharged by his employer, Sabine Pilot Service, because he refused its direction to perform the illegal act of pumping the bilges of the employer’s vessel into the waterways. Hauck was an employee at will, and Sabine contends that it therefore had the right to discharge him without having to show cause. Hauck brought a wrongful discharge action against Sabine. Decide.Please give your answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issue
Give typed explanation Kawal, a young mother with three small children, had worked at the counter of a Tim Hortons store for three years. One day, the manager observed Kawal giving a Timbit donut to a crying child who came into the store with their parents. When the manager of the store confronted Kawal about giving a donut away for free, Kawal immediately admitted to giving the donut away to the customer without paying for it. She was aware that this was against the employer’s policy, but she had been busy at the time and did not go to her purse to get the $1.50 to pay for the donut at that time. Also, knowing that day-old donuts are given away to small children in the store regularly, she felt this would be acceptable. Kawal expected to get a warning at most and was shocked when her manager terminated her employment for cause. Sarah filed a wrongful dismissal case. (PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking for your opinion. Use concepts discussed in class or your textbook to provide an…
KellyMarie Griffin works for the City of Portland, Oregon, as a clerical employee in the Parks and Recreation Department. She complains of conflict with her coworkers. In particular, Therea Lareau, the “lead” clerical employee at the same location, has made comments that are derogatory about or offensive to Griffin’s Christian faith. Ms. Lareau has referred to Griffin as “a wacko” because of her beliefs and, on at least one occasion, told Griffin that God was “a figment of [her] imagin[ation]” and that Griffin was “praying to something that didn’t exist.” Griffin also complains that many of her coworkers frequently page 51-42use “God” and “Jesus Christ” as swear words, which she finds offensive due to her religious beliefs. Griffin, however, admits that when she has informed her coworkers about how the swearing offends her, they have made efforts to avoid doing so in her presence—even Lareau. Despite that, things have deteriorated. Recently, Griffin and Lareau found themselves in a…
Some states recognize which exemption(s) to worker termination under the at-will employment doctrine? A. public policy B. implied contract C. just cause D. All of these choices are correct.
Choose the true statement: O Employees (or potential employees) with disabilities covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) must be treated the same as non-disabled employees (or potential employees). O Under common law, at-will employment relationships were ones where the employee was free to quit at any time for any reason, and the employer could discharge the employee at any time for any reason. More recently courts have looked at public policy considerations in limiting the ability of an at-will employee to quit or be fired. A "pattern or practice of discrimination" case often involves statistical comparisons of the relevant labor market population (or other "job applicant pool") and the employer's work force. It is lawful for an employer to discharge an employee because that employee is about to become entitled to a bonus. For sexual harassment to exist, the harasser must be a boss or some type of superior.