Over a period of about twelve months, a female employee at a car dealership was subjected to four incidents of unwanted touching. On the first threeoccasions, a manager of the dealership sat down next to her during business meetings at the dealership, placed his hand on her knee, slid his hand under herskirt, and moved his hand up and down her thigh. On the fourth occasion, the manager did the same thing, but the setting was a restaurant where employeeshad gone for a reception following the funeral of one of the firm's owners. The employee complained to several managers and was told to keep a record of theincidents, but no other action was taken. The employee sued. What should the court decide? Why? You are required to use, and properly APA cite (in - textcitation and reference), the class textbook in this discussion board.

Note: As per our Authoring guidelines we are not allowed to provide any citations or references in…

Answered: occasions, a manager of the dealership…

Similar questions

A teacher is a sponsor of a religious club at a high school in Happyville, USA. On September 1, 2018, the teacher is accused of and investigated for participating in a prayer that the students conducted. Which of the findings would be correct? A. The teacher was found to be within their rights to participate in the prayer, as long as the teacher led portion of the prayer is held at the end of the prayer. B. None of the above C. The teacher was found to be within their rights to participate in the prayer, as long as the portion of the prayer they stated happened right after the prayer started. D. The teacher was found to be within their rights to participate in the prayer, as long as the portion of the prayer as long as they did not lead any portion of the prayer. Don't use chatgpt otherwise I will report
Barbara Rome entered Flower Memorial Hospital to undergo a series of X-rays. When she was ready for the X-rays, she was assisted by a student radiological intern. The intern placed Rome on the X-ray table and strapped her onto the table correctly; however, the intern did not properly fasten the footboard, which was located at the foot of the table. As a result of this error, Rome fell and was hurt when the table was raised. As a consequence, Rome brought a lawsuit against Flower Memorial Hospital, alleging that the ordinary negligence of the intern had caused her injury. In contrast, the hospital argued that the lawsuit involved a medical claim, as defined under the state’s medical malpractice statute. Whether a case involves ordinary negligence or a medical claim would determine whether the state’s two-year statute of limitations for negligence or the state’s one-year statute of limitations for medical claims would apply. This case clearly involves a difference of opinion on the…
Punitive damages are awarded to punish on individual. Because of this fact, punitive damages should be available to victims of breach of contract. Please defend your position about this statement and provide at least THREE points to support your claim. NOTE PLEASE, this is business law question.
What is supervisory jurisdiction Exclusive jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction Original jurisdiction?
What is the Parol Evidence Rule? Please describe one circumstance in which you believe the rule should be followed and why? Please describe a circumstance in which you believe the rule should not be followed and why? Please not, this is business law question. Thank you.
Sam, a mid-level manager at his company, continually makes offensive remarks and gestures toward Susan, a non-manager at the company who works in another department. Susan quits her job and brings a lawsuit for sexual harassment. As a general rule under California law, the company Group of answer choices a. is strictly liable to pay general damages for the sexually harassing acts of its managers. b. is not liable if Susan complained about the problem and the company took no corrective action. c. is liable for punitive damages even if senior management had not been made aware of the problem. d. none of the above.
An altercation took place between a mother and a teacher at XY Nurserary located at 3Poinsietta Avenue, Old Harbour, St. Catherine. The incident lead to both the parent and teacherbeing locked-up for the night after a short bloody exchange. Additionally, the Early Childhood Commission got involved after receiving a complaint. Later on in the week, ti was found that many parents were concerned about the issue and became hesitant to have their children return to the institution.Task:•• Develop a memorandum to be sent out to parents reassuring them that the institution remains a safe place for their children.
Is hearsay allowed in, (explain): Court Arbitration hearings Unemployment hearings
A transit officer sees a 2-year-old child walking along the edge of a train station by herself. The officer realizes that it looks strange and dangerous that she is walking very close to the edge. While the child is standing next to the officer she prepares to jump onto the tracks. The officer could have could have grabbed her and pulled her back onto the platform, but he chose not to do so. Unfortunately, the child gets hit by a train and dies. The parents, were nearby and didn’t notice that their child walked away from them, sue the officer and the city for damages. What is the probable outcome of their suit? What if it wasn’t an officer but just another rider on the subway?
Intoxication may or may not be a defense to some crimes, discuss whether or not intoxication should be a valid defense. Keep in mind mens rea. Can an intoxicated person form the state of mind necessary to meet the requirement of intent? Does it matter whether a person is voluntarily intoxicated (as opposed to having his/her drink spiked or unknowingly drinking alcohol)?
Can you please help me answer this?
Why do facts matter when it comes to warranties either implied or expressed?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS