Julius works as an attendant for the New York Smokies professional basketball team. Julius was given explicit directions not to allow anyone onto the court, regardless of the situation. The Smokies team doctor is absent due to illness, and the other usual medical personnel (both teams' trainers) are unavailable as they have just gone to the locker room to treat two injured players; suddenly, a third player passes out. The player is unconscious, and the game comes to a sudden halt. Three fans - a primary care physician, a registered nurse, and an EMT (Emergency Medical Technician) rush down to the scene, and Julius recognizing that these three persons are there to take care of the player - lets them onto the court. It turns out the player had fainted from an unknown heart problem and needed emergency aid. The three medical specialists revived the player, and he was transported to a hospital for tests, treatment, and a full recovery. The Smokies, though, decide to fire Julius for allowing people onto the court. Is the firing justified? O Yes, Julius broke a clause in his contract that forbids him from allowing people on the court. No, Julius worked courtside and allowing who came on and off the court was fully within his discretion. O Yes, Julius has no say on the matter because the Smokies have an explicit clause for all their employees making sure they do not let people on the court. O No, this was an emergency and the player needed assistance. O Yes, they gave Julius explicit instructions not to allow anyone on the court.

Julius works as an attendant for the New York Smokies professional basketball team. Julius was given explicit directions not to allow anyone onto the court, regardless of the situation. The Smokies team doctor is absent due to illness, and the other usual medical personnel (both teams' trainers) are unavailable as they have just gone to the locker room to treat two injured players; suddenly, a third player passes out. The player is unconscious, and the game comes to a sudden halt. Three fans - a primary care physician, a registered nurse, and an EMT (Emergency Medical Technician) rush down to the scene, and Julius recognizing that these three persons are there to take care of the player - lets them onto the court. It turns out the player had fainted from an unknown heart problem and needed emergency aid. The three medical specialists revived the player, and he was transported to a hospital for tests, treatment, and a full recovery. The Smokies, though, decide to fire Julius for allowing people onto the court. Is the firing justified? O Yes, Julius broke a clause in his contract that forbids him from allowing people on the court. No, Julius worked courtside and allowing who came on and off the court was fully within his discretion. O Yes, Julius has no say on the matter because the Smokies have an explicit clause for all their employees making sure they do not let people on the court. O No, this was an emergency and the player needed assistance. O Yes, they gave Julius explicit instructions not to allow anyone on the court.

Similar questions

Give typed explanation Kawal, a young mother with three small children, had worked at the counter of a Tim Hortons store for three years. One day, the manager observed Kawal giving a Timbit donut to a crying child who came into the store with their parents. When the manager of the store confronted Kawal about giving a donut away for free, Kawal immediately admitted to giving the donut away to the customer without paying for it. She was aware that this was against the employer’s policy, but she had been busy at the time and did not go to her purse to get the $1.50 to pay for the donut at that time. Also, knowing that day-old donuts are given away to small children in the store regularly, she felt this would be acceptable. Kawal expected to get a warning at most and was shocked when her manager terminated her employment for cause. Sarah filed a wrongful dismissal case. (PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking for your opinion. Use concepts discussed in class or your textbook to provide an…
American Police officers must work within the parameters set forth in the U.S Constitution, most notably the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. A police officer with two years experience who makes a Terry Stop must be able to articulate her detention of a subject was based on reasonable cause. her investigation was based on probable suspicion. her detention was based on her gut feeling. her observations of the subject's actions led her to believe a crime was about to be committed.
KellyMarie Griffin works for the City of Portland, Oregon, as a clerical employee in the Parks and Recreation Department. She complains of conflict with her coworkers. In particular, Therea Lareau, the “lead” clerical employee at the same location, has made comments that are derogatory about or offensive to Griffin’s Christian faith. Ms. Lareau has referred to Griffin as “a wacko” because of her beliefs and, on at least one occasion, told Griffin that God was “a figment of [her] imagin[ation]” and that Griffin was “praying to something that didn’t exist.” Griffin also complains that many of her coworkers frequently page 51-42use “God” and “Jesus Christ” as swear words, which she finds offensive due to her religious beliefs. Griffin, however, admits that when she has informed her coworkers about how the swearing offends her, they have made efforts to avoid doing so in her presence—even Lareau. Despite that, things have deteriorated. Recently, Griffin and Lareau found themselves in a…
Henry is towing two water skiers on the Bandock River with the two experienced water skiers conducting “crossovers” where the skiers pass from side to side across the wake of the towing boat and across each other’s paths. Henry is distracted momentarily and drives too close to a boat moored near the shoreline and to avoid a collision he manoeuvres quickly. In doing so, Megan, one of the water skiers that Henry is towing, is propelled into a pontoon and severely injured. Megan now wants recourse for her physical injuries through the law of negligence.Required:a) Identify the legal issues arising in negligence and advise Megan as to the likelihood of success
The manager of BP Petroleum Company limited is seeking police protection for the duration of a strike, called by the Trade Union, who are protesting for increases in emoluments for their members- employees of BP. The Police suggested that a mobile patrol would be adequate, but the HR manager of BP insisted on permanent police presence, because of pending lawlessness by strikers. The manager then offered to compensate the Police, if they agree on a permanent Police presence on site, during the strike period.The Police agreed to provide 10 officers at a rate of $500 per day, per officer, which they will maintain during the entire strike period. BP later agreed with the Trade Union’s demand for increase emoluments and the strike was called off after 5 days. The Commissioner of Police within a week sent an invoice to BP for the 5 days that the Police provided protection. However, BP refused to pay, and argued that the Police are under a duty to protect the company from any pending…
Charles Byrd was in a minimum-security jail awaiting trial. A team of sheriff’s deputies wearing T-shirts and jeans took several inmates into a room for a strip search without any apparent justification. Byrd was ordered to remove all his clothing except his boxer shorts. A female deputy searched Byrd while several male deputies watched. One of the male deputies videotaped the search. Byrd filed a suit against the sheriff’s department. Did the search violate Byrd’s rights? Discuss. [Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, 629 F.3d. 1135 (9th Cir. 2011)]
Which of the following is a purpose of tort law? Multiple Choice To compensate innocent persons who are injured. To impose criminal penalties on those who commit wrongdoing. To allow a remedy for breach of contract claims. To encourage vigilante justice.
Cynthia is a union member at her company. She files a complaint against the union because of what she feels is an unfair rule. Which of the following is true? Cynthia can only file a complaint through the union's grievance procedures; she cannot sue it. Cynthia may sue the union if her complaint to the union through its grievance procedures doesn’t resolve her problem. Cynthia cannot complain to the union, but she may sue it instead. Cynthia can have her union membership stripped from her whether she sues the union or chooses to follow a complaint through the union's grievance procedures.
Which, if any, of the following is a basis for the tort of invasion of privacy in the context of the employer-employee relationship: All of the above Unreasonably intruding on the seclusion of the employee Placing the employee in a false light in the public eye Publicly disclosing private facts about the employee None of the above
On July 25, 2008, 15-year-old Andrew James was working as a labourer for Interlake Paving in Stony Mountain, Manitoba. Interlake, a small company owned by Gerald Shepell, had been contracted to pave a parking lot. James was standing on the box of a semi-trailer, scooping out asphalt with a shovel. The trailer gate unexpectedly swung open, shaking the truck. James lost his footing and fell into the asphalt in the trailer, which quickly poured out through the trailer gate onto the ground, burying him. James died almost immediately from the intense heat of the asphalt. Shepell tried to dig James out, sustaining severe burns to his own hands, arms, feet, and legs. Shepell later pled guilty to breaches of the Workplace Safety and Health Act and the Employment Standards Code (James was under-age) and was fined 34,000. You have been asked to assist the incident investigation team and complete a hazard assessment. Please provide detailed answers to the following questions to assist the…
CASE FOR MOCK TRIAL: Wacky Motors Inc., a new and used car dealership, hired Steve Simpson to perform various duties, such as cleaning and gassing vehicles, moving vehicles from one lot to another and maintaining the showroom and vehicle lots. In this position, Steve had access to keys to the vehicle through an "ignition kiosk access process." Under this process, a designated attendant, Cat Talley, keeps the keys in a restricted kiosk. When any employee wants to move a company vehicle, s/he must fill out a key "tag" or request form, which contains spaces for the date, time, stock number of vehicle, name of employee checking out the vehicle, and the destination of the vehicle. For example, the vehicle might be taken to a body shop for repairs or to a gas station, or to a company lot at a different location. Every time an employee checks out a vehicle, the reason must be for company business use. It was not necessary to put the expected return time on the tag, but if a vehicle was…
In what circumstances does the law impose liability on a person who is not at fault? How can liability without fault be justified? explain in essay type