In a class, Professor Emerson wore skinny jeans, a black, long-sleeve dress shirt with several buttons not buttoned, a "gold" chain holding a "gold" dollar sign, and a blond wig (shorter and not scraggly compared to the long blondish hippie wig worn a few classes earlier). That class with the skinny jeans, unbuttoned black shirt, gold chain, and shorter blond wig were used to make points concerning:- o the legality (public policy) element of contracts- o liquidated damages- o the intellectual property exception to absolute free speech- o contract definitions- o sexual harassment

Liquidated Damages: This option is not directly related to the clothing worn by Professor Emerson.…

Answered: In a class, Professor Emerson wore…

Similar questions

Chris bought his son a new bicycle from his local bike shop. Less than a week later, the bicycle’s handlebar broke while the boy was riding. This caused the boy to fall on concrete and break several teeth that required surgery. Chris wants to sue the manufacturer for compensation but is told that the shop merely imported the bicycle - which was manufactured overseas. Required: Explain to Chris whether he is able to take legal action for a breach of the ACL. Refer to law.
In 1975, after the war in Vietnam, the U.S. government discontinued draft registration for men in this country. In 1980, after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, President Jimmy Carter asked Congress for funds to reactivate draft registration. President Carter suggested that both males and females be required to register. Congress allocated funds only for the registration of males. Several men who were subject to draft registration brought a lawsuit that challenged the law as being unconstitutional, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the draft registration law, reasoning as follows: The question of registering women for the draft not only received considerable national attention and was the subject of wide-ranging public debate, but also was extensively considered by Congress in hearings, floor debate, and in committee. The foregoing clearly establishes that the decision to exempt women…
The statute of limitations in Texas is a.four years for a written contract. b.four years for an oral contract for a 6-month lease. c.four years for all contracts for the sale or lease of real property in Texas. d.six years for a written contract.
Can you please help me answer this?
JimmyCorps places several Facebook ads claiming that his magic tonic protects consumers from coronavirus. Harvey places an order for 50 gallons of the magic tonic to protect himself and his family. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General commences prosecution of JimmyCorps for fraud—his magic tonic is simply a gallon of bleach, and consumers who have purchased it have become gravely ill or died. Still, JimmyCorps sues Harvey when Harvey refuses to pay for the 50 gallons of tonic he ordered. Can a judge force Harvey to pay JimmyCorps? Why or why not? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Frank places a sign in his front year supporting a law which would deport all non-Caucasian immigrants from the U.S. Emily places a sign in her front yard supporting a candidate in an upcoming election. Miguel places a sign in his front yard supporting a law which requires ride-sharing companies (like Lyft) to properly pay their drivers. Assuming their city adopts an ordinance which prohibits all signs being placed in any resident's front yard, who will be permitted to keep displaying their sign? Choose all of the correct answers. A. Frank B. Emily C. Miguel
Should the public have taken more of a stance against his actions? If so, what action(s) could the public have taken? If not, give reasons why the public should not involve itself in such situations. Should the government have taken any action in this situation, given that the CEO was making a point against legislation it had introduced? If so, explain the action that you believe the government should have taken. If not, explain why you do not believe any government action is justified.
The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…
Part 1. Eric has applied for the position of a reservations clerk in your hotel. The individual has no experience, but he types quickly and accurately and has good listening skills as well as a pleasant speaking voice. Eric has very limited eyesight. He is considered to be "legally blind" and is covered by ADA. Discuss ways in which management in your hotel could accommodate Eric's disability with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Louisa, who is not a real estate license holder, owns three single-family residences, which she rents out. (She does not occupy any of the residences). Does she have to abide by the Fair Housing Act when selecting tenants? Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act, although she may not use discriminatory advertising. Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act under the Mrs. Murphy exemption. Louisa is not exempt from the Fair Housing Act. Louisa is not exempt under the Fair Housing Act, but she is exemptunder the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.
Which of the following statements is true of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Its applicability is limited to state and national government agencies. It was passed as a way to ensure that equal opportunities would be available to everyone. It applies to all organizations with a minimum of 100 employees working 20 or more hours per week. Its enforcement is the responsibility of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Procedures (OFCCP).
Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest An application of the methods to the case A conclusions

SEE MORE QUESTIONS