Which of the following is true regarding undue influence? A. One person usually takes advantage of another person’s mental, physical, or emotional weakness. B. A fiduciary relationship exists between the two parties. C. A dominant party must have unduly used his or her influence to persuade the servient party to enter into a contract. D. All of the above.

Which of the following is true regarding undue influence? A. One person usually takes advantage of another person’s mental, physical, or emotional weakness. B. A fiduciary relationship exists between the two parties. C. A dominant party must have unduly used his or her influence to persuade the servient party to enter into a contract. D. All of the above.

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Part 1. Eric has applied for the position of a reservations clerk in your hotel. The individual has no experience, but he types quickly and accurately and has good listening skills as well as a pleasant speaking voice. Eric has very limited eyesight. He is considered to be "legally blind" and is covered by ADA. Discuss ways in which management in your hotel could accommodate Eric's disability with or without a reasonable accommodation.
SMALL (08/20) 1. (a), (b), (c), or (d)? According to Michael Huemer, the prima facie right to immigrate to the United States is… (a) neutralized (b) overridden (c) neither neutralized nor overridden (d) both neutralized and overridden. 2. (a) or (b)? Ronald Cordero’s proposal is to… (a) impose a constraint on the labor market (b) remove a constraint on the labor market. Again, (a) or (b)? Cordero’s argument is (a) a moral one, to do with fairness (b) an economical one, to do with efficiency. 3. (a) or (b)? Michael Sandel’s “corruption” objection to certain markets is based on worries about (a) bribery (b) degradation.
5. A radio station plays a commercial for Beefy's restaurant. The station created the commercial by loved Beefy's. The star didn't give permission for this commercial and has never even been to Beefy A. The radio station is guilty of appropriation B. The radio station is guilty of slandering the restaurant. C. The star is guilty of negligent misrepresentation, although not intentional misrepresentation. D. The radio station is guilty of negligence Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page) << Previous Question Next Su
Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest An application of the methods to the case A conclusions
Recording Under an Accident and Health policy, which of the following persons has the right to change the beneficiary? O A. Applicant Insured O B. O C. O D. Beneficiary Policyowner Chat Whiteboard Code 372-256-906
(Read each case and specify which standard was violated) Bakhitzhan, a mining analyst with XYZ, is invited by Precision Metals to join a group of his peers in a tour of mining facilities in several western U.S. states. The company arranges for chartered group flights from site to site and for accommodations in XYZ Motels, the only chain with accommodations near the mines, for three nights. Taylor allows Precision Metals to pick up his tab, as do the other analysts, with one exception—Ivan Petrov, an employee of a large trust company who insists on following his company’s policy and paying for his hotel room himself.
Q1. To prevail in an action brought under common law, the plaintiff must show all of the following except: (in your response, explain the burdens of proof for a third-party plaintiff under common law). Q2. Kerry CPA is the auditor for Sammy Corp. During the audit, Kerry discovers a material misstatement in Sammy's financial statements. Sammy's management tells Kerry that if the misstatement is corrected or if Kerry issues an opinion that indicates there is a material misstatement, Sammy Corp. will likely have to declare bankruptcy and thousands of employees will lose their jobs. Which of the following statements is true if the misstatement is not corrected and Kerry issues an unqualified opinion on Sammy's financial statements? (in your response, identify the court case that makes Kerry liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud).
encourage a buyer to buy. Which one of the following statements is 20. An affiliate broker can legally offer an inducement, prize or gift to 12 d. TRUE: The cost of the prize does not exceed $1,000. The offer to purchase must be signed within 24 hours. The affiliate broker and broker must share in the cost of the prize. It is approved by the affiliate broker's principal broker. a. b. d. 21.An applicant for an affiliate broker's, broker's or time-share salesperson's license must apply for the license within respective license examination or be subject to reexamination. months of passing the a. b. C. d. 12 22. Which of the following statements is TRUE concerning internet advertising? It is illegal in Tennessee. The firm name and telephone number are required to be shown on the first page. Affiliate brokers are allowed to advertise on the internet without their principal broker's, or firm's name. The firm name and telephone number must be on each page. a. b. С. d. 346
If beneficence and non-maleficence principles are combined, the result of each action will be______. a. More harm than good b. None of the options c. Equal good and harm d. More good than harm
A whistleblower uses nonpublic knowledge or even top-secret knowledge to make illegal or unethical circumstances in a company public. Each employee signs in his contract a Non- Disclosure-Agreement to protect data and insider knowhow of the company. Under which circumstances is whistleblowing ethical, und which circumstances it is not ethical? Support your argumentation with the congruent ethical theories.
Decide in each of the following instances whether the statement is true or false and motivate your answer. 1. A voidable contract is neither valid nor void. 2. In law an agreement is a valid contract between the ageing parties.
Francine posts on social media that she will pay $500 to anyone who will clear her lawn of leaves. One of Francine's friends is dating Bob, who goes out and collects all the leaves. When he asks for payment, Francine says that the two never had a contract. Is Francine correct? Briefly explain.