Five different fertilizers were analyzed by two methods. Phosphate (P:Os) was analyzed using gravimetric analyse and spectrophotometric method. Analyze the results of the two methods and answer the following questions. Sample Gravimetric result Spectrophotometric results 1 25.5% 24.4% 2 9.2% 10.0% 26.2% 25.8% 4 50.5% 47.3% 5 25.6% 28.6% a Calculate the average content of P:Os in the fertilizers for each method. Compare the difference between the two average values. Im 3

Five different fertilizers were analyzed by two methods. Phosphate (P:Os) was analyzed using gravimetric analyse and spectrophotometric method. Analyze the results of the two methods and answer the following questions. Sample Gravimetric result Spectrophotometric results 1 25.5% 24.4% 2 9.2% 10.0% 26.2% 25.8% 4 50.5% 47.3% 5 25.6% 28.6% a Calculate the average content of P:Os in the fertilizers for each method. Compare the difference between the two average values. Im 3

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2
need help with this
The absorbance of a cationic iron(II) sample solution was measured in a spectrophotometer, but the instrument returned an error because the absorbance was too high. The sample was then diluted by using a pipette to take 100.0 μLμL of the sample and injecting it into a cuvette already containing 2.00 mLmL of water (total volume is 2.00 mLmL + 100.0 μLμL). The absorbance value of the diluted solution corresponded to a concentration of 7.71×10−6 M M . What was the concentration of the original solution? Express the concentration to three significant figures with the appropriate units.
I have set up my spreadsheet and was able to reproduce the result with a pKa of 4.64. TRUE OR FALSE
The students conducted the assay for LDH activity using the two serum samples. Each cuvette (path length 1 cm) contained 3ml of a suitable assay buffer (including pyruvate as substrate). 20 microlitres of either serum was added to the cuvette and the absorbance values immediately recorded at the optimum wavelength for a period of 5 minutes (absorbance readings taken every 30 seconds). Protein concentration of serum sample (mg/ml) Change in absorbance at optimum wavelength per minute Control serum (C) 8 -0.04 Diseased serum (D) 7.8 -0.6 1c. Using the molar absorption coefficient of NADH as 6220 M-1 cm-1, and by application of the Beer-Lambert law, estimate the enzyme activity in the two samples (C and D). Express activity as moles per second. 1d. Estimate the specific activity of the two samples (moles per second per microgram).
You are provided with a stock standard with a concentration of 100 mg/L, and a solution of unknown concentration. Prepare calibration standards using a 10 mL volumetric flask and a 1 mL piston pipette, and measure on the UV/Vis spectrophotometer (400 nm). Determine the concentration of the unknown after a 1:40 dilution, and provide the concentration of the initial solution. i need to learn how to do the calculations and draw a calibration curve to find concentration of unknown sample after i find the absorbances.
After creating her standard curve for absorption versus the concentration (M) of FD&C Red 40, a student found that her best fit linear line for FD&C Red 40 was y = 2,962x + 0.005. Her Kool-Aid sample had an absorbance of 0.685. If 0.543 grams of Kool-Aid powder was used to prepare an 8-fl oz cup of her assigned flavor, what is the percent by mass of FD&C Red 40 in her 8-fl oz cup?
Chloroform is an internal standard in the determination of the pesticide DDT in a polarographic analysis in which each compound is reduced at an electrode surface. A mixture containing 0.500 mM chloroform and 0.800 mM DDT gave signals of 15.3 µA for chloroform and 10.1 µA for DDT. An unknown solution (10.00 mL) containing DDT was placed in a 100-ml volumetric flask and 10.2 ul of chloroform (MW = 119.39, density = 1.484 g/mL) were added. After dilution to the mark with solvent, polarographic signals of 29.4 and 8.7 µA were observed for the chloroform and DDT, respectively. Find the concentration of DDT in the unknown.
After determining the absorbance of several standards of known concentration, the trendline for a calibration curve (AKA a standard curve) plotting absorbance (y-axis) against concentration (M, x-axis) is determined to be y = 4.586x + -0.0010 %3D The absorbance of a solution of unknown concentration is determined to be 0.68. Calculate the concentration of the unknown solution in M. Give your answer to thrėe decimal places.
Find the mean sand standard deviation of each sample.
percentage purity of an ibuprofen sample was determined by a reversed phase HPLC method as follows: Y Der ● A calibration curve of peak area versus concentration (ug/mL) of pure ibuprofen was constructed The ibuprofen sample for analysis was prepared by taking 10.0204 g of powder and dissolving it in/1Lbf distilled water (solution A). 1 ml of the latter solution was further diluted to IL with distilled water (solution B). Solution B was analysed by HPLC analysis Results The equation for the best-fit line of the calibration curve is: y=26820x-1323.8. ● The average peak area for the ibuprofen sample (solution B) was 266796.2 Calculate the percentage purity of the ibuprofen powder.
Using the data and formula shown, Find the slope, intercept, and of the calibration curve. Construct a calibration curve.