Consider a strategic interaction between firms 1and 2. In Stage 1, firm 1 chooses the level ofadvertising a > 0. In stage 2, firm 2 learns aboutfirm 1's amount of advertising a. Subsequently,firms 1 and 2 compete in a Cournot fashion. Thatis, firms 1 and 2 simultaneously andindependently choose their outputs: q1 and q2,where qi denotes the output of firm i = 1,2. Theprice that the consumers are willing to pay forthe product produced by the two firms, or theinverse aggregate demand function, is given by6a - q1 - q2. Firm 1's advertising cost is a3. Bothfirms have zero production costs. Both firmsmaximize their individual profits (equal to thetotal revenue minus total cost).In the unique subgame perfect equilibrium ofthe game, the two firms will choose thefollowing strategies:a. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 3, q1 = a/3)while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = a/3b. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 1, q1 = 16/3 )while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = 16/3c. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 32/3 , q1 = 2a)while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = 2ad. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 8/3 , q1 = 2a)while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = 2ae. None of the above

Aggregate demand function : P = 6a - q1 - q2 In a simultaneous profit maximizing game both firms…

Consider a strategic interaction between firms 1 and 2. In Stage 1, firm 1 chooses the level of advertising a > 0. In stage 2, firm 2 learns about firm 1's amount of advertising a. Subsequently, firms 1 and 2 compete in a Cournot fashion. That is, firms 1 and 2 simultaneously and independently choose their outputs: q1 and q2,

Consider a strategic interaction between firms 1 and 2. In Stage 1, firm 1 chooses the level of advertising a > 0. In stage 2, firm 2 learns about firm 1's amount of advertising a. Subsequently, firms 1 and 2 compete in a Cournot fashion. That is, firms 1 and 2 simultaneously and independently choose their outputs: q1 and q2,

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Hand written solutions are strictly prohibited
Duopoly: 1. Consider a duopoly game with 2 firms. The market inverse demand curve is given by P(Q) = 120-Q, where Q = 9₁ +9₂ and q; is the quantity produced by firm i. The firm's long run total costs are given by C₁(9₁)=2q₁ and C₂(92)=92, respectively. a. Determine the Nash Equilibrium for Cournot competition, in which firms compete based on quantity. What is each firm's best response as a function of the other firm's output? Graph these best response functions in on the same graph. Compute the associated payoffs for each firm. b. Determine the Nash Equilibrium for Bertrand competition, in which firms compete based on price and stand ready to meet market demand at that price. What is each firm's best response as a function of the other firm's price? Graph these best response functions in on the same graph. Compute the associated payoffs for each firm. Game Th
Two firms X and Y compete with each other. Firm X can produce one of three products X1, X2, or X3. Similarly, firm Y can produce one of three products Y1, Y1, and Y3. Each firm's profit depends on its own and its competitor's decision about which product to produce. These profits are given in the table below where each cell presents profits corresponding to a pair of chosen strategies with the first number being the profit of firm X and the second being the profit of firm Y. For example, if X chooses to produce X3 and Y chooses to produce Y1, the profit of X will be $15 and the profit of Y will be $20. The firms make their product choice decisions simultaneously and independently of each other. Y1 Y2 Y3 X1 0, 0 12, 8 16, 16 15, 20 18, 9 20, 15 8, 12 18, 18 9, 18 X2 X3 11) Does this game have any equilibrium in dominant strategies? If yes, find all of them. 12) In addition to the equilibria (if any) you found in the previous question, does this game have any other equilibria? If yes,…
The dropdown options are "Cleans" or "Does not clean." thank you!
Suppose two firms A and B compete against each other in a Cournot fashion by choosing their quantities. What is the Nash Equilibrium of the game if both firms have a constant marginal cost of 2 and the price in the market is: p(qa + qB) = 20 – 2(qA + qB). O (3, 3) O (2, 2) O (4, 4) None of the other answers are correct (5, 5)
Question 2 (Choices Involving Strategy): Suppose there are two competing Gyms in a local town. Each gym is individually owned and has three pricing levels to choose from: Low, Medium and High (PL,PM, and PH). Consider the table below as the outcomes for each combination of strategies (they are yearly profits in the thousands). Can you predict the outcome using ONLY iteratively dominated strategies? Why or why not? Find the Nash Equilibrium(a) using best responses. Is this the best outcome? Now, suppose that there was a sudden increase in the cost of equipment that meant the low price was no longer viable, and both choosing the medium price level meant only 50 (thousand) profit for each gym. Nothing else changes. What is the pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this new game? Gym 1 is on the left and Gym 2 is on the top. The first number inside every box is Gym 1's profit and the second (after the comma) is Gym 2's profit. (10 Marks) PL PMPH PL 125, 125 200, 75 375,50 PM 75, 250…
Two firms, Snow Kings and Ski Express, at Denver International Airport have franchises to carry passengers to and from the mountains. These two firms compete through advertising. Their payoff matrix is below. Profits per customer are represented in the following format (Snow Kings, Ski Express Snow Kings Advertise Don't Advertise Advertise 25, 15 15, 20 Ski Express Don't Advertise 30,0 40,5 What combination of strategies achieves the Nash equilibrium in this game? a) 25,25 (Advertise, Advertise) b) 15,20 (Advertise, Advertise) c) 25,0 (Advertise, Don't Advertise) d) 40,5 (Advertise, Don't Advertise)
Fill in the blanks: Consider the department store market that has two rivals, DJs and Myer. Each firm can choose to either Advertise or Not Advertise. These choices are made simultaneously. The payoffs are given below in the following figure.
Consider the payoff matrix below, which shows the advertising strategies of two competing firms. Firm A Advertise online Advertise on TV $5 Advertise on TV $40 Firm B $5 $10 Advertise online $30 $20 In the Nash equilibrium, Firm A earns $ $15 $30 and Firm B earns $
I have constructed a Bertrand game (competition in prices) and presented you with the reaction functions of each firm. p1 = 12.5 + p2/4 p2 = 5/2 + p1/2 a) Use excel to draw the reaction functions. b) Solve for the Nash equilibrium
Consider a Cournot duopoly. The inverse demand function of the market is given by p = 10-Q, where p is the market price, and Q = 91 +92 is the aggregate output. The marginal costs of the two firms are C₁ 1 and C₂ = 4. = (a) Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the game including firm out- puts, market price, aggregate output, and firm profits. (b) Now suppose these two firms play a 2-stage game. In stage 1, they produce capacities 9₁ and 92, which are equal to the Nash equilibrium quantities of the Cournot game characterised by part (a). In stage 2, they simultaneously decide on their prices p₁ and P2. The marginal cost for each firm to sell up to capacity is 0. It is impossible to sell more than capacity. The residual demand for 10 Piāj if Pi > Pj firm ij, is Di (Pi, Pj) = 10-Pi 2 = if pipi. (Note, if Pi < Pj 10 - Pi here we assume that the efficient/parallel rationing applies). Prove that it is a Nash equilibrium of the second stage subgame that each firm charges the market clearing…
8. 2 firms are engaged in Stackelberg competition. Firm 1 faces the following cost curve Ci(Q1) 3Q+4 and firm 2 faces the following cost curve. C₂(2₂) = 22 +4. Market demand is given by D(P) = 60-p. Find the Nash Equilibrium of the game. =