Suppose that two firms produce mountain spring water and the market demand for mountain spring water is given as follows: P = 125 - 91 - 92 Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a MC = 5 a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium price and quantity of each firm. b) Assume now that firm 1 becomes the Stackelberg leader. What will be the market price, output by each firm? Compared to part a, who gains? c) If Firm 1 chooses a quantity, then Firm 2 chooses a quantity (having observed Firm 1's quantity), then Firm 1 has an opportunity to revise its quantity (having observed Firm 2's quantity), then payoffs are determined, does either firm stand to gain relative to the case of simultaneous quantity choice? Why or why not? (hint: there is no need to do any calculation here)

Suppose that two firms produce mountain spring water and the market demand for mountain spring water is given as follows: P = 125 - 91 - 92 Firm 1 and Firm 2 have a MC = 5 a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium price and quantity of each firm. b) Assume now that firm 1 becomes the Stackelberg leader. What will be the market price, output by each firm? Compared to part a, who gains? c) If Firm 1 chooses a quantity, then Firm 2 chooses a quantity (having observed Firm 1's quantity), then Firm 1 has an opportunity to revise its quantity (having observed Firm 2's quantity), then payoffs are determined, does either firm stand to gain relative to the case of simultaneous quantity choice? Why or why not? (hint: there is no need to do any calculation here)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two companies are the only Snowplow merchants in a small town. Inverse market demand curve is P 100- 10Q, where Q=ql + q2 (Firm l's output =q1; Firm 2's output = q2). Each firm has marginal costs of $25. In the Nash equilibrium in this market, the market price is $ O 50 O 40 25 60
At a busy intersection on Route 309 in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, the convenience store and gasoline station, Wawa, competes with the service and gasoline station, Fred's Sunoco. In the Nash-Bertrand equilibrium with product differentiation competition for gasoline sales, the demand for Wawa's gas is qw=740-400pw + 400ps and the demand for Fred's gas is as = 740-400ps + 400pw. Assume that the marginal cost of each gallon of gasoline is m = $6. The gasoline retailers simultaneously set their prices. What is the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium? The Bertrand-Nash equilibrium is where pw = $ 7.85 and Ps =$7.85. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) Suppose that for each gallon of gasoline sold, Wawa earns a profit of $1.00 from its sale of salty snacks to its gasoline customers. Fred sells no products that are related to the consumption of his gasoline. What is the Nash equilibrium? The Bertrand-Nash equilibrium is where Pw = $ and Ps = $ (Enter your responses rounded to…
Suppose two firms, A and B, have a cost function of ?(??) = 30??, for ? = ?, ?. The inverse demand for the market is given by ? = 120 − ?, where Q represents the total quantity in the market, ? = ?? + ??. 1. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a Nash Equilibrium of the Cournot Model. 2. Let Firm A be the first mover, and Firm B be the second mover. Solve for the firms’ outputs in a SPNE of the Stackelberg Model.
* Suppose there are two identical firms in an industry who compete by setting quantities. The output of firm 1 is denoted by q, and that of firm 2 is denoted by q Each firm faces a constant marginal cost of 3. Let Q denote total output. Le Q-q+42 The inverse demand curve in the market is given by (a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantity produced by each firm and the market price. (b) If the firms could collude, what would be the total output in the mar ket? Assuming each firm produces half of the collusive output, what is the profit of each firm? (c) Suppose each firm produces half of the collusive output identified in part (b). Firm 1 considers a deviation from this arrangement. What would be the best deviating output of firm 1 and its deviation profit? (d) Suppose firms interact repeatedly over an infinite horizon, and firms have a common discount factor & € (0,1) Specify a trigger strategy for each firm to sustain the collusive arrangement as an equilibrium outcome Cal- culate…
Q8
Suppose two firms, Firm A and Firm B, are competing by setting quantities (Cournot competition). Firm A has a constant marginal cost of $10 per unit; Firm B has a constant marginal cost of $15 per unit. Assume fixed costs are equal to 0 for both firms. Hint: since fixed costs are zero and the marginal cost is constant, MC = AC. The two firms choose between producing 50 units or 100 units. If the total output is 100 units, the price is $20 per unit; if total output is 150 units, the price is $15 per unit; if total output is 200 units, the price is $10 per unit. Based on the information provided, fill in the firms’ profits in the payoff matrix below with Firm A choosing the row and Firm B choosing the column. QB=100 QB=50 QA=100 , , QA=50 , , The resulting equilibrium is for Firm A to produce ____ (50 or 100)units and Firm B to produce_____ (50 or 100) units.
Time remaining: 00:09:51 Economics The market demand function is Q=10,000-1,000p. Each firm has a marginal cost of m=$0.16. Firm 1, the leader, acts before Firm 2, the follower. Solve for the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities, prices, and profits. Compare your solution to the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities are: q1=___________ units and q2=____________units The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium price is: p=$_____________ Profits for the firms are profit1=$_______________ and profit2=$_______________ The Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantities are: q1=______________units and q2=______________units The Cournot-Nash equilibrium price is: p=$______________ Profits for the firms are profit1=$_____________ and profit2=$_______________
Consider a market in which there are two firms: A and B. Each firm produces a differentiated product and chooses its price Assume that each firm can set price equal to $60 or $70. The payoffs associated with each set of prices are shown If the firms choose price simultaneously, then the Nash equilibrium price for firm A If firm A chooses price first and can commit to that price, then firm A will Firm B's Price is set its price equal to $00 $70 OA. $60, $60 OB. $70, $70 $2700 $2475 $60 OC 570, $60 OD. $60, $70 $2700 $3375 Firm A's Price $3375 $3300 $70 $2475 $3300
Consider the following static game with two firms as the players. Each firm must decide either to upgrade (U) an existing good to a new version; or not upgrade it (N). The decisions are simultaneous. If a firm chooses to upgrade, they have to pay a fixed cost of 7. If they don’t upgrade, there is no fixed cost. The marginal cost is always equal to 3. The demand side of the market is as follows: If neither firm upgrades, each firm sells 2 units at price 4. If both firms upgrade, each firm sells 3 units at price 5. If only one firm upgrades, the one who upgrades sells 5 units at price 5, and the other firm does not sell anything.
There are two firms in a market and they compete in a Nash-Cournot manner. Firm 1 faces the demand function p1(g1,92) = 200 - 91 - 92, and has a total cost function TC1 = (91)2. Firm 2 faces the demand function p2(91,92) = 160 - 92 - 91, and has a total %3D cost function TC2 = (92)2. Answer each of the following questions. a. Find the Nash-Cournot equilibrim output and price v for firm 1. b. Find the Nash-Cournot equilibrim output v and price v for firm 2.
The demand for a product is Q = a - P/2. If there are 4 firms in an industry and marginal cost is MC = 20, then the price in Nash equilibrium is P = 56. What is a?
Consider a Stackelberg duopoly:There are two firms in an industry with demand Q = 1 − Pd.The “leader” chooses a quantity qL to produce. The “follower” observes qL and chooses a quantity qF.Suppose now that the cost function is Ci(qi) = qi2 for i = L, F. (a) Find the subgame perfect equilibrium. (b) Compare the equilibrium you found with the Nash equilibrium if the game was simultaneous (i.e., Cournot competition). Is the Nash equilibrium of the Cournot game also a Nash equilibrium of the sequential game? Why or why not?