Even though they're separated, Paul and Camille decide to study a price-fixing agreement that will mutually benefit them. The idea is that they both agree to a price higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price, using the Grim Trigger strategy (if they detect a deviation from the agreed-upon price, they switch to playing the static Bertrand prices forever). What is the weakest assumption on the discount factor & e (0, 1) that supports the existence of a SPNE with collusion in this market (that is, a SPNE with a price strictly higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price from the previous question)?

Even though they're separated, Paul and Camille decide to study a price-fixing agreement that will mutually benefit them. The idea is that they both agree to a price higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price, using the Grim Trigger strategy (if they detect a deviation from the agreed-upon price, they switch to playing the static Bertrand prices forever). What is the weakest assumption on the discount factor & e (0, 1) that supports the existence of a SPNE with collusion in this market (that is, a SPNE with a price strictly higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price from the previous question)?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Prospect X = ($4, 0.04 ; $15, 0.05 ; $24, 0.01 ; $38, p) What is the expected value of prospect X? (Hint 1: To answer this question, you'll need to first determine the value of "p"). (Hint 2: To determine "p", remember that probabilities sum to 1). (Note: The answer may not be a whole number; please round to the nearest hundredth) (Note: The numbers may change between questions, so read carefully)
Suppose you have a house worth $200,000 (wealth). Your utility of wealth is given by U(w) = ln(w). There is a small chance that a fire will damage your house causing a loss of $75,000. You estimate there is a 2% chance of fire. a) What is your expected wealth? b) What is your expected utility from owning the house? c) Suppose you can add a fire detection/prevention system to your house. This would reduce the chance of a bad event to 0 but it would cost you $C to install. What is the most you are willing to pay for the security system? (Here is an identity you will find useful
Billy John Pigskin of Mule Shoe, Texas, has a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function of the form u(c) = √c. Billy John also weighs about 300 pounds and can outrun jackrabbits and pizza delivery trucks. Billy John is beginning his senior year of college football. If he is not seriously injured, he will receive a $1,000,000 contract for playing professional football. If an injury ends his football career, he will receive a $10,000 contract as a refuse removal facilitator in his home town. There is a 10% chance that Billy John will be injured badly enough to end his career. If Billy John pays $p for an insurance policy that would give him $1,000,000 if he suffered a career-ending injury while in college, then he would be sure to have an income of $1,000,000 − p no matter what happened to him. Write an equation that can be solved to find the largest price that Billy John would be willing to pay for such an insurance policy. Here is my question: Why is Billy's income 1,000,000 - p even…
Suppose you bought a condo for $100,000 financing it with a $20,000 down payment of your own funds and an $80,000 mortgage loan from a bank. Now, instead of (a) or (b), suppose the value of the condo fell from $100,000 to $70,000. Assuming you paid $100,000, financing it with $20,000 of your own money and $80,000 with a mortgage loan, and ignoring interest and other costs, calculate your rate of return on your asset (ROA) and your rate of return on equity (ROE). What is the value of your equity stake in the condo after the price fall?
Robin Hood is 23 years old and has accumulated $4,000 in her self-directed defined contribution pension plan. Each year she contributes $2,000 to the plan, and her employer contributes an equal amount. Robin thinks she will retire at age 67 and figures she will live to age 81. The plan allows for two types of investments. One offers a 3.5% risk-free real rate of return. The other offers an expected return of 10% and has a standard deviation of 23%. Robin now has 5% of her money in the risk-free investment and 95% in the risky investment. She plans to continue saving at the same rate and keep the same proportions invested in each of the investments. Her salary will grow at the same rate as inflation. What is the expected value of Robin's risky assets at retirement?
0 Masterful Pocketwatches; the larger standard deviation indicates that Masterful Pocketwatches has less variability in its closing prices than Perfect Plungers Plus. O Perfect Plungers Plus; the smaller standard deviation indicates that Perfect Plungers Plus has a greater mean closing price than Masterful Pocketwatches. O Masterful Pocketwatches; the larger standard deviation indicates that Masterful Pocketwatches has a greater mean closing price than Perfect Plungers Plus. O Perfect Plungers Plus; the smaller standard deviation indicates that Perfect Plungers Plus has less variability in its closing prices than Masterful Pocketwatches.
Imagine that at age 25 you have the choice to begin to deposit $8000 per year into your 401k. You will retire at 65. The 401k grows at (an average of) 6% per year (it compounds yearly). Say that your utility for money is just the value of money: u(x) = x. Say that you have a “standard” discount rate of 0.95, which choice would an individual make? What is the implied break-even \beta if you have quasi-hyperbolic preferences?
You live in an area that has a possibility of incurring a massive earthquake, so you are considering buyingearthquake insurance on your home at an annual cost of $180. The probability of an earthquake damagingyour home during one year is 0.001. If this happens, you estimate that the cost of the damage (fully coveredby earthquake insurance) will be $160,000. Your total assets (including your home) are worth $250,000.
Jane, who works for the economic research department in a multinational corporation, is preparing a report for the advisory board of the company. The report intends to clarify in which country they should invest given the expected change in demand. The objective is, of course, to identify the country with greater change in demand. Jane analyzes countries A and B that currently have the same demand. She calculates the partial derivatives of demand with respect to income and finds that for country A it is greater than for country B. Demand in country A is measured in pounds and in country B in Kg. Can we conclude that if the only change expected in both countries is a change in income of 3.5%, then the company should invest in country A? no, we should calculate instead the income elasticity for the consumption of the good the company sells in each country. There is no statistic that can illuminate the advisory board on this problem. yes, because the derivative tells us that for each…
Prospect Y = ($10, 0.25 ; $13, 0.75) If Will's utility of wealth function is given by u(x)=x0.25, what is the value of EU(Y) for Will? (In other words, what Expected Utility does Will receive from prospect Y?) (Note: The answer may not be a whole number; please round to the nearest hundredth) (Note: The numbers may change between questions, so read carefully)
Matthew is playing snooker (more difficult variant of pool) with his friend. He is not sure which strategy to choose for his next shot. He can try and pot a relatively difficult red ball (strategy R1), which he will pot with probability 0.4. If he pots it, he will have to play the black ball, which he will pot with probability 0.3. His second option (strategy R2) is to try and pot a relatively easy red, which he will pot with probability 0.7. If he pots it, he will have to play the blue ball, which he will pot with probability 0.6. His third option, (strategy R3) is to play safe, meaning not trying to pot any ball and give a difficult shot for his opponent to then make a foul, which will give Matthew 4 points with probability 0.5. If potted, the red balls are worth 1 point each, while the blue ball is worth 5 points, and the black ball 7 points. If he does not pot any ball, he gets 0 point. By using the EMV rule, which strategy should Matthew choose? And what is his expected…
You have a net worth of $901395 and a utility function given by u(w) = w0.5. If your house %3! catches fire, a 3% likelihood of occurring, you expect it to be total loss and it was recently assessed at $792999. What is the risk premium ($) you'd be willing to pay for full coverage against this fire risk? Hints: Compute the certainty equivalent (CEQ) as you did in Comm 220 and recall that the risk premia is the amount you'd be willing to pay over the expected loss Answer: