Imagine that at age 25 you have the choice to begin to deposit $8000 per year into your 401k. You will retire at 65. The 401k grows at (an average of) 6% per year (it compounds yearly). Say that your utility for money is just the value of money: u(x) = x. Say that you have a “standard” discount rate of 0.95, which choice would an individual make? What is the implied break-even \beta if you have quasi-hyperbolic preferences?

Imagine that at age 25 you have the choice to begin to deposit $8000 per year into your 401k. You will retire at 65. The 401k grows at (an average of) 6% per year (it compounds yearly). Say that your utility for money is just the value of money: u(x) = x. Say that you have a “standard” discount rate of 0.95, which choice would an individual make? What is the implied break-even \beta if you have quasi-hyperbolic preferences?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

what happens when expected profit equal total investment
Suppose your utility function for money is a square-root function of its value in US dollars. So, for instance, $400 is worth 20 utils for you, $961 is worth 31 utils for you, and $62.5K is worth 250 utils for you. Now, let’s say your annual salary is $90K, although there is a small risk (p = 0.05) that something catastrophic will happen and reduce your income for the year to $14.4K. An insurance company comes along and offers to insure you against the loss of your salary. The cost of the insurance is $4,736. If you buy the policy and catastrophe strikes, the insurance company will pay out the $75,600 that you would otherwise have lost. From the standpoint of maximizing expected utility, would buying this insurance be a good deal for you? What would be the insurance company’s expected monetary value of selling you the policy?
A sports mortgage is the brainchild of Stadium Capital Financing Group, a company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. It is an innovative way to finance cash-strapped sports programs by allowing fans to sign up to pay a “mortgage” over a certain number of years for the right to buy good seats at football games for several decades with season ticket prices locked in. The locked-in price period is 50 years in California. Assume you and your brother went to UCLA. Your brother, Harold, purchases a $45,000 mortgage and pays for it now to get season tickets for $290 each for 50 years, while you, being a three-time alumnus of the same university, are able to buy season tickets at $390 in year 1, with prices increasing by $20 per year for 50 years. What should Harold have been willing to pay UCLA upfront for the mortgage to make the two plans exactly equivalent economically if the rate of interest is 8% per year? (Assume Harold has no reason to give extra money to UCLA at this point and that…
The price of a bond with no expiration date is originally $1,000 and has a fixed annual interest payment of $150. If the price of the bond then falls by $200, what will be the interest rate yield to a new buyer of the bond? Multiple Choice 10 percent 15 percent 9.4 percent 12.5 percent 18.8 percent
Suppose you have a monthly income of $1000, $850 in monthly expenses, and you can put money in a savings account that yields a monthly interest rate of 4%. Now suppose you have an opportunity to invest your money at a 12% return. Further suppose you are able to borrow at 3%. Assuming you invest all of your money and then borrow against your future payout, show your trade-off between present and future consumption. If you still need to consume $850 in the present, how much will you have to spend in the future?
What is the expected return from an investment if there is a 20 percent chance of a 4 percent return, a 40 percent chance of a 8 percent return, and a 40 percent chance of a 12 percent return
Kevin's reference dependent utility over money is y and effort is E, refer to the: instantaneous utility function: rt: reference point for wealth, which demonstrated his recent wealth Kevin does not have from money but from gains and losses of money instead. There is no discounting, and assume that Kevin's current wealth from his job is 0. Kevin is thinking about a new role at work which allows him to increase his income by $1000 per period for two periods, counting from the current period, which is t = 0. He must undergo a training which require an effort of EO = 3500 at that value of alpha, how much ultility would Kevin lose relative to his non-projection-biased preferences if she took the position 1000 250 500 750