Consider a market in which there are two firms: A and B. Each firm produces a differentiated product and chooses its price Assume that each firm can set price equal to $60 or $70. The payoffs associated with each set of prices are shown If the firms choose price simultaneously, then the Nash equilibrium price for firm A If firm A chooses price first and can commit to that price, then firm A will Firm B's Price is set its price equal to $00 $70 OA. S60, S60 $2700 $2475 B. $70, $70 C. $70, S60 D. $60, $70 $60 $2700 $3375 Firm A's Price $3375 $3300 S70 $2475 $3300

Consider a market in which there are two firms: A and B. Each firm produces a differentiated product and chooses its price Assume that each firm can set price equal to $60 or $70. The payoffs associated with each set of prices are shown If the firms choose price simultaneously, then the Nash equilibrium price for firm A If firm A chooses price first and can commit to that price, then firm A will Firm B's Price is set its price equal to $00 $70 OA. S60, S60 $2700 $2475 B. $70, $70 C. $70, S60 D. $60, $70 $60 $2700 $3375 Firm A's Price $3375 $3300 S70 $2475 $3300

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. Consider a Cournot competition environment with one good and two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2. The (pure) strategy space of Firm 1 is S₁ = [0, 1], and the strategy s₁ of Firm 1 corresponds to the amount of the good they produce. Similarly, the (pure) strategy space of Firm 2 is S2 = [0, 1], and the strategy s2 of Firm 2 corresponds to the amount of the good they produce. If Firm 1 were to produce quantity s₁ and Firm 2 were to produce quantity s2, the prevailing price in the good market would be 1 — 81 — 82, the utility of Firm 1 would be their profit, u₁ (81, 82) = (1-81-82 - c)81, and the utility of Firm 2 would be their profit, u2($1, $2) = (1-81-82-c)s2, where 0 ≤ c< 1 is the marginal cost of production for both firms. (a) Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (b) Are there other Nash equilibria in this game.
Imagine that firm X chooses their quantity first, then firm Y observes the quantity of firm X and chooses their own quantity. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium? Is there a first or second-mover advantage here? You don't need to draw the whole game tree but you should give some kind of explanation for how you came to this equilibrium. (You may assume that firm X can only choose quantities that are multiples of 200. This prevents you from having to deal with prices that are not on the schedule and makes firm Y's strategy easier to write. )
Please no written by hand and no image (Bertrand's duopoly game with discrete prices) Consider the variant of the example of Bertrand's duopoly game in this section in which each firm is restricted to choose a price that is an integral number of cents. Take the monetary unit to be a cent, and assume that c is an integer and a>c+!. Is (c,c) a nash equilibrium of this game? Is there any other nash equilibrium?
Consider the Bertrand pricing game from class. If both firms have identical marginal cost of $10 and consumers will purchase from whichever firm is cheapest as long as the price is under $50, what will be the Nash equilibrium? A B C D 50, 50 50, 10 10, 10 10,50
Two companies are the only Snowplow merchants in a small town. Inverse market demand curve is P 100- 10Q, where Q=ql + q2 (Firm l's output =q1; Firm 2's output = q2). Each firm has marginal costs of $25. In the Nash equilibrium in this market, the market price is $ O 50 O 40 25 60
At a busy intersection on Route 309 in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, the convenience store and gasoline station, Wawa, competes with the service and gasoline station, Fred's Sunoco. In the Nash-Bertrand equilibrium with product differentiation competition for gasoline sales, the demand for Wawa's gas is qw=740-400pw + 400ps and the demand for Fred's gas is as = 740-400ps + 400pw. Assume that the marginal cost of each gallon of gasoline is m = $6. The gasoline retailers simultaneously set their prices. What is the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium? The Bertrand-Nash equilibrium is where pw = $ 7.85 and Ps =$7.85. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) Suppose that for each gallon of gasoline sold, Wawa earns a profit of $1.00 from its sale of salty snacks to its gasoline customers. Fred sells no products that are related to the consumption of his gasoline. What is the Nash equilibrium? The Bertrand-Nash equilibrium is where Pw = $ and Ps = $ (Enter your responses rounded to…
Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Warmbreeze Pricing High Low Flashfry Pricing High 11, 11 2, 15 Low 15, 2 8, 8 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Warmbreeze prices low, Flashfry will make more profit if…
PLEASE CHECK THIS HOW TO SOLVE PLEASE TEACH EXPLAIN STEP BY STEP
Please show all work...
(J)
Suppose that Snapface and Instashot are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell polaroid cameras. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for cameras. Snapface Pricing High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Snapface prices low and Instashot prices high, Snapface will earn a profit of $18 million, and Instashot will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Snapface and Instashot are both profit-maximizing firms. Instashot Pricing High Low 11, 11 2, 18 18, 2 10, 10 If Snapface prices high, Instashot will make more profit if it chooses a high price, and if Snapface prices low, Instashot will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Instashot prices high, Snapface will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a ▼ price. Considering all of the information given, pricing high If the firms do not collude,…
Please no written by hand and no emage Consider the following Stackelberg duopoly. Both firms produce a homogenous good. Firm 1 chooses how much to supply first. Firm 2 chooses how much to supply after observing the quantity supplied by firm 1. The market demand is Q = 100 - 10P. For firm i, the total cost of production is TC (q) = 5q₁. In a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium, how much does firm 2 produce?