Suppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria, SaudiArabia has far more oil reserves and is the lower-cost producer compared toNigeria. The payoff matrix in the table to the right shows the profits earnedper day by each country. "Low output" corresponds to producing the OPECassigned quota and "high output" corresponds to producing the maximumcapacity beyond the assigned quotaWhich of the following statements is true?OA. The Nash equilibrium is a cooperative equilibrium.OB. The Nash equilibrium is a noncooperative, dominant strategyequilibriumOC. The Nash equilibrium is a collusive equilibrium.D. There is no Nash equilibrium in this game because each party.pursues its dominant strategy.Low outputNigeriaHigh outputLow outputNigeria earns$20 millionSaudi ArabiaNigeria earns$30 millionSaudi Arabiaearns $100 millionSaudi Arabiaearns $80 millionHigh outputNigeria earns$12 millionSaudi Arabiaearns $75 millionNigeria earns$20 millionSaudi Arabiamama 560 million5

This question focuses on determining the nature of the Nash equilibrium in this game theory…

suppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Saudi Arabia has far more oil reserves and is the lower-cost producer compared to Nigeria The payoff matrix in the table to the right shows the profits earned per day by each country. "Low output corresponds to producing the OPEC assigned quota and "high output corresponds to producing the maximum capacity beyond the assigned quota Which of the following statements is true? OA. The Nash equilibrium is a cooperative equilibrium B. The Nash equilibrium is a noncooperative, dominant strategy equilibrium OC. The Nash equilibrium is a collusive equilibrium. OD. There is no Nash equilibrium in this game because each party pursues its dominant strategy KED Low output Nigeria Nigeria earns $20 million Low output High output Saudi Arabia Nigeria earns $30 million Saudi Arabia earns $100 million Saudi Arabia earms 500 million High output Nigeria earns $12 million Saudi Arabia eams $75 million Nigeria earns $20 million Saudi Arabia eams 560 million

suppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Saudi Arabia has far more oil reserves and is the lower-cost producer compared to Nigeria The payoff matrix in the table to the right shows the profits earned per day by each country. "Low output corresponds to producing the OPEC assigned quota and "high output corresponds to producing the maximum capacity beyond the assigned quota Which of the following statements is true? OA. The Nash equilibrium is a cooperative equilibrium B. The Nash equilibrium is a noncooperative, dominant strategy equilibrium OC. The Nash equilibrium is a collusive equilibrium. OD. There is no Nash equilibrium in this game because each party pursues its dominant strategy KED Low output Nigeria Nigeria earns $20 million Low output High output Saudi Arabia Nigeria earns $30 million Saudi Arabia earns $100 million Saudi Arabia earms 500 million High output Nigeria earns $12 million Saudi Arabia eams $75 million Nigeria earns $20 million Saudi Arabia eams 560 million

Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971509

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter3: Interdependence And The Gains Rrom Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question & Use the table to answer the question. Apples Bananas Country A Country B 800 500 O a O b Ос Od 1500 If all resources of Country A and Country B were dedicated toward the production of either apples or bananas, the maximum production of each is summarized in the table above. In order for both countries to benefit from trade, which country should specialize in banana productio and why? 1600 Review Answers Country A since it has the absolute advantage in banana production. Country A since it has the comparative advantage in banana production. Country B since it has the comparative advantage in banana production. Country B since it has the absolute advantage in banana production. Saved at 8:09 am Support | Schoology Blog | PRIVACY POLICY | Terms of
Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the United States' imposing trade restrictions on imported tires. Read the following scenario and answer the question that follows. The president of the United States argues that the United States should threaten to impose a tariff on Chinese tires in order to induce the Chinese to remove its tariff on American cars. Which of the following justifications is the president using to argue for the trade restriction on tires? O Jobs argument O Unfair-competition argument O National-security argument O Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument O Infant-industry argument
Which of the following is proof that international trade is beneficial? O the fact that different regions in the United States specialize in different products O the international trade in exotic products O the sheer volume of trade between very different nationsswer text provided. O the concept of absolute advantage
Givenw: (1) two nations (1 and 2) which have the sametechnology but different factor endowments and tastes, (2)two commodities (X and Y) produced under increasingcosts conditions and (3) no transportation costs, tariffs orother obstructions to trade.Prove geometrically that mutually advantageous tradebetween the two nations is possible.Note: Your answer should show the autarky (no-trade) andfree-trade points of production and consumption for eachnation, show gains from trade of each nation and expressthe equilibrium condition that should prevail when trade Stop equilibrum
Glacier has a comparative advantage in the production of a comparative advantage in the production of Congaree specialize in the production of the goods in which each After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of and million pounds of basil. Suppose that Glacier and Congaree agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 16 million pounds of corn for 16 million pounds of basil. This ratio of goods is known as the price of trade between Glacier and Congaree. The following graph shows the same PPF for Glacier as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate Glacier's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. BASIL (Millions of pounds) 64 56 BASIL (Millions of pounds) 48 40 32 24 16 8 0 64 56 40 0 48 PPF 24 8 PPF 0 8 0 16 The following graph shows the same…
Explain with the help of diagrams:1. Assume that the Indian JuteIndustry is at present in a equilibrium state with the producers supplyingjute bags only to the domestic market atthe prevailing market prices. Apart from domestic suppliers, Indian juteindustry faces competition from Bangladesh. Explain with the help ofsupply-demand curves how the following events affect the equilibrium in thejute industry?a. Poor domestic demandb. Increasedcompetition from Bangladeshc. Cement industry,which is one of the largest users of jute bags,exempted from mandatory jute packagingd. Farmers, instead ofproducing jute, use their farm lands for some other purposes.
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a god, t means that it can produce this good at a lomer opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods. The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Maldonia and Desania. Both countries produce lemons and tea, each intialy (i.e, befare spedialization and trade) producing 24 million pounds of lemons and 12 milion pounds of tea, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. Maldonia Desonia 40 24 PPF 2 41 s LEMONS (Miliona of pounda) 16 34 2 4 16 34 LEMONS (Mona of pounda) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of . while Desonia has a comparative advantape in the ▼ . Suppose that Maidonia and Desonia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. Alter specialization, the two countries can produce a total of 45 milion pounds of tea and48…
This question pertains to the addendum to Chapter 2. Thefollowing tables show the production possibilities for twohypothetical countries, Italia and Nire. Which country has thecomparative advantage in producing butter? Which country hasthe comparative advantage in producing guns? What would be amutually agreeable rate of exchange between the countries?
Refer to Figure 1. Figure 1. Partial equilibrium analysis of trade in bananas Nation 1 World Market Nation 2 Pb/Pc Pb/Pc Pb Pc P2 A" D. XS Pw MD PI S'I D' Qd QB Bananas Q'd Bananas Bananas 1) O 1) The partial equilibrium analysis shows that the trade volume, Nation 1's exports, and Nation 2' imports of bananas are equal. O 2) The partial equilibrium analysis shows that the trade volume of bananas is less than Nation 1's exports but more than Nation 2' imports. 3) The partial equilibrium analysis shows that the trade volume of bananas is more than Nation 1's exports but less than Nation 2' imports. 4) The partial equilibrium analysis shows that the trade volume, Nation 1's exports, and Nation 2' imports of bananas are different.
1. Export Subsidies (under perfect competition) in a small countrya. For a small country, is the logic for why export subsidies provide negative gainsdifferent than the logic for why import tariffs provide negative gains? Explain2. Airbus and Boeing problem again. Suppose Boeing is more efficient at making airplanesthan Airbus. Starting from slide 33, Figure 10-9, let’s change the payoff matrix, so that if Boeingand Airbus both produce, Boeing gets +5, instead of -5. And, if Boeing produces, and Airbusdoes not produce, Boeing gets +125 instead of +100. Will there be a unique equilibrium in thiscase?3. Trade and the Environment Figure 11-4 in the slides shows a case of a negativeproduction externality and in which free trade leads to imports. Instead, analyze the case inwhich free trade leads to exports (i.e., the world price is greater than the no-trade price).a. Create your version of figure 11-4a, but illustrate the case in which the world price ishigher than the no-trade price.b.…
Trade between two countries can benefit both countries if O each country exports that good in which it has a comparative advantage; O each country has a more elastic demand for the imported goods: O each country produces a wide range of goods for export. O each country enjoys superior terms of trade3;
Suppose that the U.S. textile industry is competitiveand there is no international trade in textiles. In longrunequilibrium, the price per unit of cloth is $30.a. Describe the equilibrium using graphs for theentire market and for an individual producer.Now suppose that textile producers in other countriesare willing to sell large quantities of cloth in theUnited States for only $25 per unit.b. Assuming that U.S. textile producers have largefixed costs, what is the short-run effect of theseimports on the quantity produced by an individualproducer? What is the short-run effect on profits?Illustrate your answer with a graph.c. What is the long-run effect on the number of U.S.firms in the industry?