A television advertisement for General Mills’ Total cereal made the following claim: “It would take 16 ounces of the leading natural cereal to equal the vitamins in 1 ounce of fortified Total.” The Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a petition against General Mills claiming that the advertisement is deceptive. It was the center’s position that the claim overstated Total’s nutritional benefits because the cereal is not 16 times higher in other factors important to nutrition.a. Is the claim misleading? Justify your answer.b. How should the FTC proceed in cases such as this?c. What are the implications of cases such as this for marketing management?
A television advertisement for General Mills’ Total cereal made the following claim: “It would take 16 ounces of the leading natural cereal to equal the vitamins in 1 ounce of fortified Total.” The Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a petition against General Mills claiming that the advertisement is deceptive. It was the center’s position that the claim overstated Total’s nutritional benefits because the cereal is not 16 times higher in other factors important to nutrition.a. Is the claim misleading? Justify your answer.b. How should the FTC proceed in cases such as this?c. What are the implications of cases such as this for marketing management?
Principles Of Marketing
17th Edition
ISBN:9780134492513
Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1DQ
Related questions
Question
A television advertisement for General Mills’
Total cereal made the following claim: “It would
take 16 ounces of the leading natural cereal to
equal the vitamins in 1 ounce of fortified Total.”
The Center for Science in the Public Interest
filed a petition against General Mills claiming
that the advertisement is deceptive. It was the
center’s position that the claim overstated Total’s
nutritional benefits because the cereal is not 16
times higher in other factors important to nutrition.
a. Is the claim misleading? Justify your answer.
b. How should the FTC proceed in cases such as
this?
c. What are the implications of cases such as this
for marketing management?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, marketing and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles Of Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134492513
Author:
Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:
Pearson Higher Education,
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9781259924040
Author:
Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337386920
Author:
William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles Of Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134492513
Author:
Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)
Publisher:
Pearson Higher Education,
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9781259924040
Author:
Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. Hartley
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:
9781337386920
Author:
William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)
Marketing
ISBN:
9780134149530
Author:
Gary Armstrong, Philip Kotler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Contemporary Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:
9780357033777
Author:
Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning