9. An article from the American Journal of Public Health reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention targeted to Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay, bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). A representative sample of 254 such men was randomized to be in either the intervention group (n=152, with 141 ultimately participating in the study) or the control group (n=152, with 147 ulitmately participating in the study). The primary outcome under study getting tested for HIV within the six-months following group assignment (randomization) among those who had been sexually active in this same six-month follow-up period. At six months of follow-up, 141 subjects in the intervention group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since randomization. Of these 141 men, 114 had been tested for HIV since being randomized. At six months of follow-up, 147 subjects in the control group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since randomization. Of these 147 men, 40 had been tested for HIV since being randomized. The difference in proportions of men being tested in the intervention group compared to the control group is 0.54 (54%). Suppose this intervention were used in a community with 1,000 Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay. bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). What would be the expected effect on HIV testing outcomes? There would be an estimated 460 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 540 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 460 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 540 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
9. An article from the American Journal of Public Health reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate
the efficacy of an intervention targeted to Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay, bi-sexual or other men who have sex
with men (MSM).
A representative sample of 254 such men was randomized to be in either the intervention group (n=152, with 141
ultimately participating in the study) or the control group (n=152, with 147 ulitmately participating in the study). The
primary outcome under study getting tested for HIV within the six-months following group assignment (randomization)
among those who had been sexually active in this same six-month follow-up period.
At six months of follow-up, 141 subjects in the intervention group reported having had sex (with men and/or women)
since randomization. Of these 141 men, 114 had been tested for HIV since being randomized.
At six months of follow-up, 147 subjects in the control group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since
randomization. Of these 147 men, 40 had been tested for HIV since being randomized.
The difference in proportions of men being tested in the intervention group compared to the control group is 0.54
(54%). Suppose this intervention were used in a community with 1,000 Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay.
bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). What would be the expected effect on HIV testing
outcomes?
There would be an estimated 460 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention)
than if the intervention was not given.
There would be an estimated 540 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention)
than if the intervention was not given.
There would be an estimated 460 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention)
than if the intervention was not given.
There would be an estimated 540 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention)
than if the intervention was not given.
Transcribed Image Text:9. An article from the American Journal of Public Health reports the results from a randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention targeted to Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay, bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). A representative sample of 254 such men was randomized to be in either the intervention group (n=152, with 141 ultimately participating in the study) or the control group (n=152, with 147 ulitmately participating in the study). The primary outcome under study getting tested for HIV within the six-months following group assignment (randomization) among those who had been sexually active in this same six-month follow-up period. At six months of follow-up, 141 subjects in the intervention group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since randomization. Of these 141 men, 114 had been tested for HIV since being randomized. At six months of follow-up, 147 subjects in the control group reported having had sex (with men and/or women) since randomization. Of these 147 men, 40 had been tested for HIV since being randomized. The difference in proportions of men being tested in the intervention group compared to the control group is 0.54 (54%). Suppose this intervention were used in a community with 1,000 Hispanic/Latino men who identify as gay. bi-sexual or other men who have sex with men (MSM). What would be the expected effect on HIV testing outcomes? There would be an estimated 460 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 540 fewer men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 460 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given. There would be an estimated 540 more men getting tested for HIV (in the six months following the intervention) than if the intervention was not given.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Discrete Probability Distributions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman