1. Transform the data model to a physical model (database design). Note: a. Draw the entity-relationship diagram (ERD) in Crow's foot notation using MS Visio 2019/2021. Use only the crow's foot database notation (template) in MS Visio (10 pts. penalty is assessed if the wrong template is used). b. There must be no many-to-many relationships (to place FKs appropriately). c. The ERD must include not only tables, foreign keys and relationships with cardinalities but also all columns and their data types (do not use char type only; you need to choose the appropriate data types for each column instead) and also display data types in the Visio file (10 pts. reduction if data types are not included or displayed). See below for instructions on how to enable and modify the display of data types. d. The names must be the same as provided in the data model; clearly label the primary keys and foreign keys. e. All foreign keys are required, i.e., cannot be null. GG_SERVICE PK ServiceID ServiceDescription CostPerHour I OWNER PK OwnerID OwnerName OwnerEmail OwnerType -+----Has EMPLOYEE PROPERTY_SERVICE PK EmployeelD PK PropertyServiceID --Perform--O o Has H LastName FirstName ServiceDate HoursWorked CellPhone ExperienceLevel Attend TRANINING COURSE PK CourseID Date Time Location o---Has---+ Uses OWNED PROPERTY PK PropertyID PropertyName Street City State Zip Has SUB_PROPERTY PK PropertyID PK SubPropertyID SubPropertyType SubPropertyName Description EQUIPMENT PK EquipmentID EquipmentType Manufacturer Model DatePurchased -Require--0 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PK RepairID CostOfRepair DateOfCompletion

MARKETING 2018

19th Edition

ISBN:9780357033753

Author:Pride

Publisher:Pride

Chapter1: An Overview Of Strategic Marketing

Section1.2: Dollar Shave Club: The Company For Men

Problem 1C

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?

Recommended textbooks for you

MARKETING 2018

Marketing

ISBN:

9780357033753

Author:

Pride

Publisher:

CENGAGE L

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

MARKETING 2018

Marketing

ISBN:

9780357033753

Author:

Pride

Publisher:

CENGAGE L

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)

Marketing

ISBN:

9781337386920

Author:

William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Foundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa…

Marketing

ISBN:

9781285193946

Author:

William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Management, Loose-Leaf Version

Management

ISBN:

9781305969308

Author:

Richard L. Daft

Publisher:

South-Western College Pub

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS