Reaction Paper 2 crm 222
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Saint Leo University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
222
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by BrigadierAlligatorPerson762
1
Code of Self-Sacrifice
Jessica Hodges
Saint Leo University
1/27/24
2
Code of Self-Sacrifice
The concept of self-sacrifice in the context of terrorism refers to the willingness of individuals to give up their lives for a cause they believe in, often driven by ideological, religious, or political motivations. This is often seen in suicide bombings or other forms of attacks where the perpetrator knowingly puts their life at risk (Martin, 2020).
The Japanese code of Bushido, often translated as "the way of the warrior," is a complex and multifaceted code of conduct that was followed by the samurai, the warrior class of feudal Japan (Martin, 2020). One of the key tenets of Bushido is self-sacrifice, which is relevant in several ways. The code of Bushido is deeply intertwined with the concept of self-sacrifice. The samurai were expected to put their duty, their honor, and the welfare of others above their own lives. Argument in support of the code: Supporters of this code often argue from a perspective of extreme ideological or religious conviction. They may believe that their actions are justified by a higher cause or purpose, such as fighting against perceived oppression, or injustice, or defending their faith or community. They may also believe in rewards in the afterlife for their sacrifice (Martin, 2020).
The Waffen SS, a paramilitary organization within the Nazi regime, is often associated with the concept of self-sacrifice due to the extreme loyalty and commitment expected from its members (Martin, 2020). However, it's important to note that this self-sacrifice was often coerced or manipulated and was used to further the harmful and destructive goals of the Nazi regime. Argument against the code: Critics of this code argue that it promotes violence, loss of life, and terror. They contend that such actions are morally and ethically wrong, causing harm to innocent people and destabilizing societies. They also argue that it is a manipulation of
3
individuals by organizations for their political or ideological gain, exploiting vulnerabilities such as poverty, lack of education, or feelings of disenfranchisement (Martin, 2020).
In the context of terrorism, individuals may believe they are acting with integrity and self-sacrifice based on their own beliefs or the ideology of their group. However, these actions are generally seen as misguided and harmful by broader society, which values life, peace, and the
well-being of all individuals. It's crucial to understand that while terrorists may perceive their actions as acts of integrity and self-sacrifice, these actions are not condoned by international law or ethical standards. The use of violence and harm towards innocent people is universally condemned.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
References
Martin, C. Gus. (2020). Understanding Terrorism
(7
th
Edition). SAGE Publications.