Referral feedback

TASK 1 -Choose and briefly explain 1 macro tool (e . g. PESTLE) - Choose and briefly explain 2 micro tools (e . g . ob s ervation ; exit interview s, incident investigation etc.) -Evaluate all 3 tools - what are their advantages and disadvantages as analysis tools? - For each too/, explain how it can help diagnose issues , challenges and opportunities • Do NOT remove any of the pre v ious narrative. We MUST be able to see your previous submis s ion work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be as s essed 2nd Assessor grade: 2nd Assessor comments : For your resubmission: • • Do NOT remove any of the pre v ious narrative . We MUST be able to s ee your previous submission work . • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed • Please note you only have 1 more submission available. If you do not achieve a pass on your nex t submission you will be required to complete a whole new assignment set by the CIPD. You mus t read the feedback carefully and make sure you make all the required revisions. For your future development: 3rd Assessor grade: 3rd Assessor comments : ACl . 3 Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others' ideas. Insufficient demonstration of knowledge , understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Insufficient examples included, where required, to support answers . Presentation and structur e of assignment is not appropriate and does not meet the assessment brief. Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer . Demonstrates an acceptable level of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Sufficient and acceptable examples included, where required, to support answers . Required format adopted but some improvement required to the structure and presentation of the assignment. Answers are acceptable but could be clearer in responding to the task and presented in a more coherent way. Sufficient evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer . Demonstrates good knowledge , understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Includes confident use of examples, where required, to support each answer . Presentation and structure of assignment is appropriate for the assessment brief. Answers are clear and well expressed . Good evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. Demonstrates a wide range and confident level of knowledge, understanding or skill (as appropriate) . Includes strong examples that illustrate the point being made, that link and support the answer well. Answers are applied to the case organisation or an alternative organisation . Answers are clear , concise and well argued, directly respond to what has been asked . The presentation of the assignment is well structured, coherent and focusses on the need of the questions. Considerable evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform answer . 5/29/23 , 12 : 03 PM Feedback for 5CO02 LEARNER ASSESSMENT BRIEF -Associate Diploma in People Management. - Oakwood International https:/ / learnerhub . oakwoodinternational . co . uk / d2I / lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_feedback . d2I?db=100&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=7053 3/13

TASK 1 ACl .5 Assess how different ethical perspectives can influence decision- making . Insufficient demonstration of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Insufficient examples included, where required, to support answers. Demonstrates an acceptable level of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Sufficient and acceptable examples included , where required, to support Demonstrates good knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Includes confident use of examples , where required, to support each answer . Demonstrates a wide range and confident level of knowledge, understanding or skill (as appropriate) . Includes strong examples that illustrate the point being made, that link and support the Presentation and structure of answers. Required format Presentation and structure of answer well. Answers are applied assignment is not appropriate and does not meet the assessment brief. adopted but some improvement required to the structure and assignment is appropriate for the as s essment brief. Answers are clear to the case organisation or an alternative organisation. Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to presentation of the assignment. Answers are acceptable but could and well expressed . Good evidence of the use of references to wider Answers are clear, concise and well argued, directly respond to what has help inform answer. be clearer in responding to the task and presented reading to help inform answer . been asked. The presentation of the assignment is in a more coherent way. well structured, coherent and Sufficient evidence focusses on the of the use of references to wider need of the questions. reading to help Considerable inform answer. evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform answer . 1st Assessor grade : 1.m23 1st Assessor comments: You have explained three ethical perspectives in this answer, Anas, but we need to see a clearer assessment of the influence of each one in decision making in the people profession. For your resubmission: - Although it has some merit , it ' d be better to Strike-through your response . -Briefly explain each perspective. -Assess how successful they are at influencing decisions for the people professional. -For each theory, given an example of a people practice decision that could be supported by knowledge of the theory. • Do NOT remov e any of the pre v iou s narrative . We MUST be able to see your pr e viou s s ubmission work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears fike-tltt5-: • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed 2nd Assessor grade: 2nd Assessor comments: For your resubmission : • Do NOT remove any of the pre v ious narrative . We MUST be able to see your previous submission work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears fike-tltt5-: • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed

assessment brief. structure and Answers are clear organisation . Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer . presentation of the assignment . Answers are acceptable but could be clearer in responding to the and well expressed . Good evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer . Answers are clear , concise and well argued, directly respond to what has been asked. The presentation of task and presented in a more coherent the assignment is well structured, way. coherent and Sufficient evidence focusses on the of the use of references to wider need of the questions. reading to help Considerable inform answer . evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform answer. 1st Assessor grade: 1.m23 1st Assessor comments: One unique reference , 6 years old. You have outlined several ways in which people practices add value in an organisation in this answer, and you have discussed some measures too . However, you need to outline how each measure examines a specific people practice intervention. For your resubmission: • -Keep your paragraph on how people practices add value, but Strike-through your first shorter paragraph and the rest of your response. -Using subheadings(e.g. ROI, ROE, models of evaluation or staff survey) explain how three measure help measure the impact of specific people practices . TASK 1 • Do NOT remove any of the pre vi ous narrative . We MUST be able to see your previous submission work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed 2nd Assessor grade: 2nd Assessor comments: For your resubmission: • Do NOT remove any of the previous narrative . We MUST be able to see your previous submission work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be as sesse d • Please note you only have 1 more submission available. If you do not achieve a pass on your next submission you will be required to complete a whole new ass ignment set by the CIPD. You mus t read the feedback carefully and make sure you make all the required revisions. For your future development: 3rd Assessor grade: 3rd Assessor comments : TASK 2

TASK 2 AC2.2 Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. Insufficient demonstration of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Insufficient examples included, where required, to support answers. Presentation and structure of assignment is not appropriate and does not meet the assessment brief. Insufficient or no evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. Demonstrates an acceptable level of knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Sufficient and acceptable examples included, where required, to support answers. Required format adopted but some improvement required to the structure and presentation of the assignment. Answers are acceptable but could be clearer in responding to the task and presented in a more coherent way. Sufficient evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. Demonstrates good knowledge, understanding or skills (as appropriate) required to meet the AC. Includes confident use of examples, where required, to support each answer . Presentation and structure of assignment is appropriate for the assessment brief. Answers are clear and well expressed . Good evidence of the use of references to wider reading to help inform answer. Demonstrates a wide range and confident level of knowledge, understanding or skill (as appropriate). Includes strong examples that illustrate the point being made, that link and support the answer well. Answers are applied to the case organisation or an alternative organisation. Answers are clear, concise and well argued, directly respond to what has been asked. The presentation of the assignment is well structured, coherent and focusses on the need of the questions. Considerable evidence of the use of references to wider reading to inform answer. 1st Assessor grade: 1.m23 1st Assessor comments: You need to present two charts in this answer Anas , in order to present your key findings to stakeholders. Please also check on your assertion that the production department has the highest number of days lost due to absence - This is incorrect. For your resubmission: -Provide 1 chart that demonstrates some of your main findings from the data in Table 1. -Provide 1 chart that demonstrates some of your main findings from the data in Table 2. - Provide some summary narrative with each chart which explains what it shows. • Do NOT remove any of the pre v ious narrative. We MUST be able to s ee your previou s s ubmission work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears fike-tltt5-: • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed 2nd Assessor grade : 2nd Assessor comments: For your resubmission: • Do NOT remove any of the pr ev iou s narrative. We MUST b e a ble to see your previous s ubmi ss ion work. • Please add new narrative in red font for submission 2. Please use blue font for submission 3 • For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears fike-tltt5-: • Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed