Initial Literature Review Grading Rubric
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
836
Subject
English
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
2
Uploaded by DanyaU
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Description
of the
Problem
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
The review gives a clear
description of the research
problem and provides an
essential background to the
reader to connect the initial
literature review to the
problem.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
The research
problem is
adequately described
and enables the
reader to connect the
initial literature review
to the problem.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Review needs further
development with regards to
describing the research
problem.
0 pts
Not
Present
15 pts
Theological
Literature
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
The review demonstrates an
advanced understanding of
relevant literature, pointing to
the theological concepts
undergirding the research
problem.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
The review presents
the relevant literature
pointing to the
theological concepts
undergirding the
research problem.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Review needs further
development-relevant
literature that points to the
theological concepts
undergirding the research
problem.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Theoretical
Literature
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
The review demonstrates an
advanced understanding of
relevant literature which
points to the theoretical
concepts undergirding the
research problem.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
The review presents
the relevant literature
which points to the
theoretical concepts
undergirding the
research problem.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Review needs further
development-relevant
literature which points to the
theoretical concepts
undergirding the research
problem.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Thematic
Literature
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
The review demonstrates an
advanced understanding of
relevant literature which
points to the thematic
concepts undergirding the
research problem.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
The review presents
the relevant literature
which points to the
thematic concepts
undergirding the
research problem.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
The review needs further
development-relevant
literature which points to the
thematic concepts
undergirding the research
problem.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Initial Literature Review Grading Rubric | CLED805_B01_202420
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Writing
Style,
Mechanics,
and
Alignment
with
Instructions
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
There is a clear and logical
flow to the assignment, and
exceptional care is
demonstrated in aligning the
submitted work with
assignment instructions. The
assignment is 5–7 pages and
is free of glaring errors in
spelling, grammar, and
punctuation.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
There is a clear and
logical flow to the
assignment, and it
generally aligns with
the assignment
instructions. The
assignment has
some errors in
spelling, grammar,
and punctuation.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
There is a need for greater
clarity and improved logical
flow to the assignment. More
attention is needed to align
the submitted work with
assignment instructions. The
assignment has several
errors in spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation.
0 pts
Not
Present
25 pts
APA
Formatting
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
The review demonstrates
understanding and skill in
using current APA style for
bibliographic material. The
assignment is an example of
a professionally-presented
and carefully formatted
assignment.
17 to >16 pts
Proficient
The format of the
submitted work is in a
form appropriate for
the nature of the
assignment and
follows current APA
style as required.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment format lacks
professionalism appropriate
to doctoral-level work.
Greater care in current APA
format is needed.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Total Points: 150
Initial Literature Review Grading Rubric | CLED805_B01_202420
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help