Peer Review NURS 4325
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Texas, Arlington *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
4325
Subject
Communications
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by SuperHumanCrowMaster866
Instructions Peer Review
Date: Assessment Completed by: Peer Review of: Instructions
1.
Open the Instructions assignment to be familiar with the assignment and criteria while responding to these questions. 2.
Select a draft to review that has not already been reviewed or only has one review.
3.
Enter your feedback in the "Instructions Assignment Peer Review Form" and return it to your peer. Due: Sunday of Week 4 by 11:59 pm
Your narrative responses must be in complete sentences and must use language
found in "peer review sample" 1.
The instructions include all of the sections required. The instructions include an introduction, materials needed, and numbered instructions. The requirements for the instructions are met. 2.
The introduction identifies the document’s audience in terms of its knowledge and need for the instructions. It tells what the instructions will allow readers to do and provides an overview of the steps. It gives the audience a sense of how long the task will take, where it should be performed, and provides cautions or warnings when need. The introduction states that these instructions are for spa professionals. It does not state how long the process will take. 3.
The instructions have 10 or more steps. The steps use imperative mood. Each step is a specific action. The instructions include a 15-step process on how to perform a facial. The
steps use imperative mood. Each step tells a specific and clear action. 4.
The document has a clear hierarchy of headings. The steps are numbered
throughout. There is an appropriate amount of white space. It makes effective use of the four basic design principles (contrast, alignment, proximity, repetition). Design features, such as fonts, font sizes, and forms
of emphasis are applied consistently. The overall design is clear and consistent. The document clearly shows headings and is boxed to outline each category of this document. The steps are numbered, there is an
appropriate amount of white space, and there is multiple design features that stand out to the reader such as font colors and sizes. 5.
There are at least two illustrations. The illustrations are effective, each serving a functional purpose (meaning, it helps the reader better comprehend the task at hand). It is not merely used for decorative purpose. The illustrations are appropriately documented, displayed, and labeled. There are 2 illustrations that showcase the process of this task. I would recommend putting a short description of what each process of the picture
is to give the reader a visual of what step it is. 6.
The instructions are written as active voice commands. Headings and numbered/bulleted items are in parallel form. The second person (you) is used. The instructions are written in active voice commands. The headings are numbered and bulleted in parallel form. Second person is not used in the instructions. 7.
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. If there are errors, point those out to your peer. There are no spelling, grammar or punctuation errors to note. The writing of the documents is clear and comprehendible to the reader. 8.
Rate how well the paper aligns with the assignment guidelines (minimal = does not meet assignment guidelines; medium = meets about 75% of the assignment guidelines; very high = meets 95% or above of the assignment
guidelines). Minimal Low Medium High Very high 9.
Suggestions for meeting the assignment guidelines I would suggest expanded the introduction some more such as adding the time it would take to complete. I would add a small description to the pictures describing what is happening in them. 10.Write a final comment to your peer about two of the overall strengths and one overall weakness of the of first draft One strength is that the document is appealing and it is easy to follow instructions with clear and simple instructions. One weakness is the introduction which can be expanded some more as stated above. Grading: Worth 20 points
10 points for each peer review
You will receive deductions for the following:
1.
Not using complete sentences
2.
Not answering each question on the form
3.
Not using the guided language from the "Peer Review Sample," in each response
4.
Using only one sentence responses for each question
Due:
Sunday of Week 4 by 11:59pm CST
as a "reply" to your peer's post.
**No points will be awarded for missing/late peer review.
**Finally, if you choose to post only your own draft and do not review the drafts of
at least two of your peers, you will receive a "0" for the assignment.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help