Open_Letter_Assignment_Self-Reflection_300_words
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Blacktown Girls High School *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
9011M
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
Pages
4
Uploaded by ChancellorField3990
Nebraska Wesleyan University
Quick Submit
Quick Submit
Open Letter Assignment: Self-Reflection 300 words
Open Letter Assignment: Self-reflection 300 Words …
Document Details
Submission ID
trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Submission Date
Nov 26, 2023, 5:06 PM EST
Download Date
Nov 26, 2023, 5:08 PM EST
File Name
Open_Letter_Assignment_Self-Reflection_300_words.pdf
File Size
75.1 KB
2 Pages
369 Words
2,228 Characters
Page 1 of 4 - Cover Page
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Page 1 of 4 - Cover Page
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
How much of this submission has been generated by AI?
0%
of qualifying text in this submission has been determined to be
generated by AI.
Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required.
It is essential to understand the limitations of AI detection before making decisions
about a student's work.
We encourage you to learn more about Turnitin's
AI detection
capabilities before using the tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the percentage mean?
The percentage shown in the AI writing detection indicator and in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the
submission that Turnitin's AI writing detection model determines was generated by AI.
Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the
likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that
the score is less reliable.
However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the
percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in
greater detail according to their school's policies.
How does Turnitin's indicator address false positives?
Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained in paragraphs that make up a
longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be AI-generated will be highlighted blue
on the submission text.
Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the
percentage shown.
What does 'qualifying text' mean?
Sometimes false positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated), can include lists without a lot of structural variation, text that literally repeats
itself, or text that has been paraphrased without developing new ideas. If our indicator shows a higher amount of AI writing in such text, we advise you to take that
into consideration when looking at the percentage indicated.
In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing
ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student.
Disclaimer
Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify
both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an
organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred.
Page 2 of 4 - AI Writing Overview
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Page 2 of 4 - AI Writing Overview
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Open letter: Self-reflection
In completing the open letter assignment, I have gained valuable insights and developed several
writing skills and communication strategies.
Three Things Learned:
Persuasive Writing Techniques:
One key takeaway from this assignment is the refinement of
persuasive writing techniques. I learned how to effectively articulate my concerns and proposed
solutions in a compelling manner. For instance, I employed evidence from recent research
studies by Chang et al., Sotomayor et al., Kilius et al., and Shizha et al. to strengthen my
arguments and highlight the urgency of the issues faced by GTA college students.
Tailoring Tone to Audience:
Understanding the importance of tailoring the tone to the audience
was
another
significant
learning
point.
Recognizing
that
the
Minister
of
Colleges
and
Universities is a key decision-maker, I maintained a respectful and persuasive tone throughout
the letter. This involved striking a balance between urgency and diplomacy to effectively convey
the severity of the issue while respecting the recipient's position.
Integration of Evidence:
I honed my ability to integrate evidence seamlessly into my writing.
The inclusion of statistics and findings from reputable research studies, such as Trottier et al.
(2021), added credibility to my arguments. This experience improved my skills in incorporating
evidence to support claims and enhance the overall persuasiveness of my communication.
Two Challenging Aspects:
Balancing Detail and Conciseness: One challenge I faced was striking the right balance between
providing
sufficient
detail
and
maintaining
conciseness.
Ensuring
that
the
letter
was
comprehensive yet concise required careful consideration of each word's impact on the overall
message.
Addressing Counter Arguments: Anticipating and addressing potential counterarguments proved
to be another challenging aspect. While advocating for tuition reduction and financial assistance,
I had to acknowledge potential fiscal constraints and counterarguments the Minister might pose.
Balancing my position with potential opposing views required thoughtful consideration.
One Enjoyable Aspect:
Page 3 of 4 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Page 3 of 4 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One aspect of the open letter assignment that I particularly enjoyed was the opportunity to
advocate for positive change. Crafting a compelling argument to address real-world issues
affecting GTA college students allowed me to feel a sense of purpose in my writing. Knowing
that my words could potentially contribute to positive outcomes for students in the region was
motivating and made the assignment both meaningful and enjoyable.
Page 4 of 4 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306
Page 4 of 4 - AI Writing Submission
Submission ID trn:oid:::1:2762701306