Examining the Impact of Oregon.edited
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Massachusetts Institute of Technology *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
13
Uploaded by AdmiralGorillaMaster1016
1
"Examining the Impact of Oregon's Measure 110: A Comprehensive Literature Review."
Name
Professor
Institution
Date
2
Introduction
The introduction thoroughly overviews the history and significance of "Measure 110," the
ground-breaking drug policy reform initiative in Oregon. Measure 110, which decriminalizes the possession of small amounts of all narcotics, represents a significant break from conventional approaches to drug charges and was approved by Oregon voters in November 2020. This ground-
breaking policy is motivated by Portugal's successful drug decriminalization model and represents a move away from punitive measures and toward health-centric strategies. Measure 110 promises to reduce racial inequities in drug arrests and reallocate significant funding towards
health services for persons battling substance misuse against the backdrop of growing drug-
related difficulties. Understanding the complex ramifications of this policy change necessitates a thorough literature analysis of Measure 110's effects. Academics and investigators have examined multiple facets, including legal, social, and public health, offering priceless perspectives on the achievements, difficulties, and possible enhancements linked to this audacious endeavor. In addition to analyzing the goals and requirements of Measure 110, the literature study critically assesses its early effects, lessons learned, and the various viewpoints surrounding its execution. This essay aims to provide a comprehensive knowledge of Measure 110's ramifications and contribute to well-informed conversations on Oregon's drug policy in the future by synthesizing and analyzing the body of current material on the subject.
Background
The background information on Oregon's drug laws provides the framework for comprehending the motivation for Measure 110. Oregon has experienced the convergence of social, legal, and public health concerns as it has battled drug-related problems throughout the years. The state's prior strategies, which were based on a punitive system that prioritized
3
criminalization, had yet to be successful in tackling the underlying issues related to drug use. Measure 110 is a ground-breaking effort that resulted from reevaluating the state's strategy due to
the deficiencies of the previous system (RTI International, 2022). The historical setting emphasizes the necessity for a paradigm shift against the backdrop of growing drug-related difficulties, and it also lays the groundwork for the creative and revolutionary remedies that Measure 110 introduces.
Measure 110's development and approval dramatically shifted Oregon's drug-policy landscape. Motivated by the recognition that previous punitive actions had been insufficient, this proposal attracted public backing and was passed by voters in November 2020. Its passing signifies a general understanding that other approaches, such as those motivated by Portugal's prosperous drug decriminalization model, need investigation (Abraham & Roshan, 2021). Portugal's strategy, which prioritized health over punishment, acted as a model and showed that decriminalization might have a beneficial impact on the treatment of substance misuse and related problems. Thus, Measure 110 represents a proactive response to past difficulties and a dedication to creative solutions based on best practices supported by research and insights from effective global models.
Literature Review
Introduction to Literature Review
The study of the literature offers a critical analysis of the various facets of Measure 110, including its effects on the legal, social, and public health domains. The opening section of this thorough analysis sets the scene by summarizing the main features of Measure 110, which includes decriminalizing small amounts of all narcotics and significantly reallocating funding to health services for those who are struggling with substance dependence. This synopsis offers a
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
background to examine academic publications and research projects later. The literature review's goals go beyond simple documentation; they also seek to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of Measure 110's execution. The study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of
the measure's early impacts, lessons learned, and evolved opinions by combining findings from multiple sources. The main objective is to add to a well-informed discussion on the consequences
of Measure 110 by highlighting its advantages, possible drawbacks, and possibilities for development in Oregon's drug policy.
Review of Literature
Racial disparities in drug arrests pre-Measure 110
Pre-existing racial inequities in drug arrests are examined in the literature surrounding Measure 110, providing essential insights into the historical context that prompted the necessity for such a radical policy. Prior to Measure 110's adoption, there were noticeable racial differences in drug arrest rates, disproportionately affecting some neighborhoods. According to a study by the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission, which Abraham and Roshan (2021) quoted, Measure 110 was expected to reduce racial inequalities in drug arrests by 95 percent significantly. This figure highlights the measure's primary driving force: to address drug-related offenses fairly and reasonably.
Opposition to Measure 110 by law enforcement and non-profit organizations
Notable stakeholders with opposing views on Measure 110 included law enforcement and
non-profit organizations. Schmidt and Mike (2021) state that these organizations were against the
proposal because they were worried about tearing down the current court referral system for addiction treatment. The resistance from law enforcement, a historically powerful actor in drug
5
policy, illustrates the difficulties in transitioning from punitive to more health-focused tactics. The opposing viewpoints of non-profit groups like Oregon Recovers highlight how difficult it can be to navigate policy changes, especially when long-standing institutions are under attack. Comprehending the opposition towards Measure 110 offers significant background information for evaluating the measure's effects and possible opportunities for enhancement in cooperation with these interested parties.
Public funding for substance use prevention and treatment in Oregon.
An international perspective is added to the literature review through a comparative analysis of public funding for substance use prevention and treatment in Portugal and Oregon. Before Measure 110, Oregon and the federal government were already spending $235 million a year in public monies for substance misuse prevention and treatment, according to Abraham and Roshan (2021). However, the results still needed to catch up to national standards. The author compares this situation to Portugal, where public spending on drug abuse prevention and treatment was only 0.05 percent of GDP from 2009 to 2012 and 0.03 percent from 2013 to 2016. This comparison emphasizes how important it is to evaluate funding distribution critically and consider how it can affect the efficacy of drug policy initiatives. The comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the economic aspects and resource allocation concerns surrounding the implementation of drug policy reforms that draw inspiration from global models.
Real World Challenges
Schmidt's analysis of Measure 110's effects on Oregon's drug scene thoroughly evaluates the observable results that followed the measure's enactment. The study is noteworthy for its examination of the direct consequences of drug-related arrests, substance addiction trends, and the overall public health environment. Schmidt Mike (2021) notes a significant decline in arrests
6
for possession of controlled substances, consistent with Measure 110's goal of adopting a more health-focused strategy. One beneficial outcome highlighted is the flow of monies into harm reduction services, which fills a significant financial shortfall for these services. This careful analysis sheds light on Measure 110's complex effects, showing its achievements in lowering arrest rates and its potential for improving harm reduction programs. Still, it also poses concerns about the more significant public health and safety ramifications.
The study of Measure 110's early lessons and difficulties by Russoniello et al. explores the challenges of implementing a revolutionary drug policy. The paper thoroughly analyzes the measure's achievements, including drops in drug-related arrests and rises in financing for services connected to harm reduction. However, it also reveals problems, including problems with the monies' delayed disbursement and the more extensive background of drug policy adjustments brought on by the COVID-19 epidemic (Russoniello et al., 2023). Russoniello et al. provide insightful analysis for stakeholders and policymakers by providing a fair appraisal of the advantages and disadvantages of Measure 110's early implementation. This allows for a more complex understanding of the measure's effects.
The empirical investigation of stakeholder views offered by RTI International's study on the perceived effects of drug decriminalization in Oregon shows insightful qualitative data to support quantitative analysis. To obtain information on perceived shifts in crime rates and public perception, the survey included individuals from various sectors, such as law enforcement, emergency services, and community corrections (RTI International, 2022). The results show that criminal justice system officials believe that when Measure 110 was implemented, certain crimes
—especially those involving property—went up. The study also highlights the complex nature of
the perceived effects, as non-criminal legal system officials offer competing theories, such as the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
impact of outside variables like political upheaval and modifications to the drug trade (RTI International, 2022). This careful analysis adds to a more thorough comprehension of the many viewpoints that various stakeholder groups have regarding the implications of Measure 110.
Bret Stephens' critical viewpoint on Measure 110's ramifications upends the mainstream narrative by drawing attention to possible adverse outcomes. The article raises questions about the measure's effectiveness in tackling substance abuse and public safety by pointing to a notable
increase in unintended opioid overdose deaths and a spike in gunshot events in Portland. Stephens' criticism challenges the upbeat stories surrounding Measure 110 by pointing out the potential unexpected repercussions of significant changes to drug policy and recommending careful thought through them. Stephens adds to a more comprehensive knowledge of the difficulties and potential dangers connected with decriminalization initiatives by offering an opposing viewpoint.
Orsini's analysis of how drug policy liberalization affects public safety gives the literature
study a more academic feel by highlighting the broader repercussions of drug policy reforms outside of Measure 110's local setting (Orsini, 2022). The study thoroughly analyzes the societal dynamics that may influence the effect of drug policy liberalization on public safety by considering various issues, such as inflation, changes in the drug market, and civil unrest. Orsini's comprehensive literature review advances our knowledge of the intricacies of modifying drug laws. It emphasizes the significance of considering extraneous variables that could influence the results of policy reforms.
Analysis of Literature
A thorough examination of the literature paints a complex picture of the advantages and disadvantages of Measure 110 in Oregon. On the one hand, the proposal appears capable of
8
accomplishing its stated objectives. Schmidt's analysis shows a significant decline in arrests for possession of controlled substances, which is consistent with the goal of the policy, which is to decriminalize small amounts of all narcotics. According to Russoniello et al., funding for harm reduction programs is a step in the right direction toward tackling the public health impact of substance abuse. However, there have been obstacles in the shape of criticism from the police and non-profit groups, as well as worries expressed by Bret Stephens about an increase in violent
occurrences and overdose deaths. These difficulties highlight the difficulties in shifting from a punitive to a health-focused strategy and stress the significance of tackling various problems related to drug policy reform.
The literature's major themes and trends show how complex drug policy change is and how it affects many aspects of society. The social justice aspect of Measure 110 is emphasized by
the persistent topic of racial inequities in drug arrests before the measure. Another trend that keeps coming up is the resistance from law enforcement and non-profits, highlighting the inherent conflicts in changing well-established structures. A worldwide viewpoint is presented by
a comparative study of public funding for substance misuse prevention and treatment in Portugal and Oregon, which identifies a common theme of difficulties in allocating resources to address substance addiction issues. The topics above highlight the necessity of a comprehensive and all-
encompassing approach to drug policy, acknowledging the interdependence of legal, social, and public health aspects.
A comprehensive evaluation of the literature highlights the various viewpoints regarding the implications of Measure 110. According to RTI International's study on perceived impacts, stakeholders have differing views. While representatives of the criminal justice system believe that specific crimes are on the rise, representatives of the non-criminal legal system believe these
9
changes result from more prominent societal reasons. Bret Stephens' critical viewpoint offers skepticism and challenges narratives that are overly positive by drawing attention to possible adverse outcomes, especially in light of the rising number of violent occurrences and overdose deaths. This variety of perspectives highlights how difficult it is to assess the benefits and drawbacks of Measure 110, and it is therefore essential for researchers and policymakers to take a variety of perspectives into account when formulating future drug policy recommendations. The many points of view highlight how crucial it is to continue conducting research and evaluating policies to provide evidence-based policymaking and a more thorough knowledge of the measure's effects.
Discussion
The literature review results are synthesized to offer a comprehensive picture of Measure 110's effects and usefulness in relation to Oregon's drug policy environment. Although the policy
has shown promise in terms of a notable decrease in drug-related arrests and a rise in financing for harm reduction agencies, it has also encountered several difficulties. Law enforcement and non-profit groups' criticism serves as a reminder of how difficult it is to carry out a significant policy change this significant. Bret Stephens's (2023) critical perspectives, which highlight the rise in overdose deaths following Measure 110, emphasize this dynamic even more. The summary of these results highlights the necessity of a thorough, impartial assessment that considers both the advantages and possible disadvantages.
Analyzing Measure 110's effects on drug-related outcomes reveals a complex picture. Although there is proof that arrests are being decreased and resources are being redirected toward harm reduction, as Stephens pointed out, the rise in overdose deaths raises questions about the overall effect on public health. This paradox highlights the complex interplay between
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
changes in drug policy and their outcomes. Divergent opinions regarding the efficacy of the measure, as brought to light in the Russoniello et al. (2023) study, show the necessity of continual assessment and modification. The study's conclusions, which show disagreements among interested parties, emphasize the importance of considering different viewpoints to guide evidence-based policies. The perceived effects on public safety and law enforcement, in addition to the difficulties faced by organizations that get funds from Measure 110, all add to the complexity of the conversation. To meet these obstacles, a cooperative and flexible strategy is needed, acknowledging that drug-related problems are dynamic and that ongoing assessment is necessary to improve the efficiency of the existing measures.
Recommendation
Recommendation from Literature Review
Several suggestions are made for resolving the issues raised by Measure 110 in light of the academic knowledge obtained from the literature review. First and foremost, legislators, law enforcement authorities, non-profits, and public health organizations must continue to communicate and work together (Russoniello et al., 2023). Law enforcement and non-profit groups' opposition points to a gap that calls for a thorough engagement approach to reconcile disagreements and promote a common understanding of the objectives and difficulties of the policy. Furthermore, academics stress the significance of ongoing assessment and adjustment in response to the changing terrain of drug-related concerns (Abraham & Roshan, 2021). Establishing a mechanism for periodic evaluations and feedback cycles will facilitate instantaneous modifications, guaranteeing that Measure 110 stays adaptable to the ever-changing
obstacles it aims to tackle. Moreover, research indicates that focused teaching programs may be essential in reducing opposition and promoting a better-educated public conversation on the
11
advantages and disadvantages of the proposal. Public awareness initiatives can contribute to Measure 110's long-term success by eradicating myths and strengthening support for the legislation's core values.
Scholars suggest that to enhance Measure 110's execution, funding for harm reduction and addiction treatment groups should be distributed more quickly and thoroughly. Improving the measure's efficacy requires expediting the money allocation procedure and guaranteeing that monetary resources go to the intended recipients on time (Russoniello et al., 2023). In addition, researchers stress how crucial it is to establish systems for thorough data gathering and analysis to support evidence-based decision-making. By implementing a robust monitoring and evaluation mechanism, policymakers can discover any unexpected repercussions and learn more about how the measure affects different demographic groups. This data-driven approach will promote openness and provide insights for future iterations and enhancements to the metric.
Program Recommendation
Providing improved infrastructure as part of the program proposals is imperative to achieve Measure 110's goals. This entails enhancing and growing the current harm reduction programs, drug treatment centers, and mental health resources. The establishment of a comprehensive and easily navigable network of services is vital in delivering all-encompassing assistance to persons grappling with substance abuse. Furthermore, taking into account the socioeconomic aspects that contribute to drug-related concerns is necessary when investigating prospective modifications to better fit with the objectives of reducing substance misuse and enhancing public health (Orsini, 2022). Measure 110 can be strengthened by focused community development projects, educational initiatives, and economic empowerment tactics that target the underlying causes of drug misuse and advance the long-term welfare of society. By
12
implementing these suggestions, legislators can improve the measure's efficacy and make sure it reflects the overall goals.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the analysis of Oregon's Measure 110, as revealed by a thorough literature assessment, highlights the intricacy and importance of this ground-breaking drug policy change. The initiative, which took inspiration from Portugal's successful decriminalization model, sought
to drastically change the focus from arrests for drugs to one that is health-centric to address past issues, notably racial inequities in drug-related arrests. Although notable achievements, such as fewer drug-related arrests and more financing for harm reduction agencies, obstacles, and differing viewpoints show how difficult it is to implement such revolutionary policies. Consideration of contrasting perspectives and a critical assessment of Measure 110's effects on drug-related outcomes highlight the necessity of continuing communication and flexible approaches. Academic advice stresses teamwork, prompt funding distribution, and focused education programs to overcome resistance and improve the policy's efficacy. Expanded addiction treatment facilities and socioeconomic interventions to address underlying causes contributing to substance misuse are among the upgraded infrastructure recommendations made by the program. Ultimately, the summary of conclusions and suggestions highlights the significance of a flexible, evidence-based approach to drug policy reform and provides insightful
information for stakeholders and policymakers.
References
Abraham, & Roshan. (2021). How Portugal Inspired Oregon's Radical Decriminalization of Drugs
. ProQuest.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
13
Orsini, M. M. (2022, December 5). Effects of Drug Policy Liberalization on Public Safety: A Review of the Literature
. Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?
abstract_id=4294150
RTI International. (2022). Understanding the Impact of Drug Decriminalization in Oregon | RTI
.
Www.rti.org. https://www.rti.org/impact/building-evidence-understanding-impacts-drug-
decriminalization-oregon
Russoniello, K., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., Naidoo, T., Wheelock, H., Hurst, T., & Rouhani, S. (2023). Decriminalization of drug possession in Oregon: Analysis and early lessons. Drug Science, Policy and Law
, 9
, 205032452311674. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245231167407
Schmidt, & Mike. (2021). Oregon’s Pioneering Drug Decriminalization Experiment Is Now Facing the Hard Test. ProQuest.
Stephens, B. (2023, August 4). Oregon’s hard-drug decriminalization disaster | Bret Stephens
. The Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/the-hard-drug-
decriminalization-disaster/