ENGL148_Week_3_Peer_Review_Worksheet_on_Template-4 (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
The University of Nairobi *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
148
Subject
Communications
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by musunguarnold8
Week 3 Peer Review Worksheet
(The worksheet begins on page 3, but please review page 1 very carefully.)
1.
Stop. Are you reviewing a classmate who already has a review or reviews?
2.
Remember: Review a classmate with no reviews if possible.
3.
Required Resources
a.
Your chosen classmate's main post, including their Week 3 Argument Research Essay
Proposal Worksheet
4.
Peer Review
a.
You will complete the peer review worksheet on pages 2-3 of this document and attach the
completed Peer Review Worksheet as a reply to the classmate's initial post.
b.
Peer Reviews are due posted by Saturday night.
c.
Try to review classmates who do not yet have any reviews.
d.
Do not copy or plagiarize in any way in the Writing Workshop.
5.
Very Important Reminders:
a.
Be honest yet kind and supportive.
b.
It is understood that you are not an English teacher. Writing workshops are not designed
that way. Rather, this is your chance to commune with other writers for growth all
around. Your answers to peer review questions will be based on your understanding and
completion of your own prewriting and planning worksheet.
c.
Students are not required to use the feedback given to them by classmates; this activity
helps you see how many others have approached the assignment, how you can
personally do better, and how you might support other learners.
d.
Your instructor will not critique anyone publicly here. This is your space for interaction.
Your instructor will post resources throughout the week for the class, but the instructor
will not "butt in" on the review process.
e.
Again, be kind and supportive in every word you write for a peer review.
f.
The peer review sheet begins on the next page. You do not need to include this
instructions/reminders page when you post the review if you do not wish to.
g.
Type or write by hand- either is fine, as long as it is readable.
6.
When you complete the Peer Review Sheet,
a.
Write longer, more complete responses about your peer's essay.
b.
Make at least one helpful suggestion for each question on the peer review sheet.
c.
Quote from 1 to 3 times from your peer's writing to help explain a suggestion.
7.
Ways to quote from your peer's writing,
a.
Quote from your peer's writing to help explain the suggestions you are making.
b.
Quote from your peer's writing in order to help them clarify some points they are making.
c.
For example, You write that your main stance is "Social media has both helped and harmed
people since the beginning". I think you might want to pick one side or the other to make
your argument stronger and you might also want to be more specific about what group of
people you will be dealing with (young children, teens, older adults, etc.)
©2021 Chamberlain University
When you complete the Peer Review,
o
Write longer, more complete responses about your peer's essay.
o
Make at least one helpful suggestion for each question on the peer review
sheet.
o
Quote from 1 to 3 times from your peer's writing to help explain suggestions
©2021 Chamberlain University
Your Name: Angelica Ladron De Guevara Hernandez
The Name of Your Classmate Being Reviewed: Katie Vixaisack
Peer Review Questions – Required – Please type your answers in the right-hand column below.
Question/Task
Answer/Explanation
Before you answer questions about each part of
your classmate's worksheet, read through all of
their responses in all parts. What about their
topic, main ideas and details do you like best?
Please share at least two things you feel will work
well for an Argument Research Essay, or things
you feel will appeal well to a reader.
I appreciate the relevance and significance of
the chosen topic. My classmate has selected the
Covid-19 pandemic, a global issue affecting
millions of people. It is an engaging and
essential subject for an Argument Research
Essay. Additionally, emphasizing learning from
failures and preparing for future pandemics is
commendable, as it focuses on proactive
solutions.
In Part 1A of the worksheet, does the student
clearly state their stance? Is their stance an
arguable one?
If so, please discuss what you like about it and
what made it effective.
If not, please explain how you feel the stance
needed to be clearer.
The student clearly states their stance within
the debate, asserting that "Covid-19 put every
country and the global health system to the
test. How, why, and where the world and
individual countries succeeded or failed against
COVID-19..." This stance is arguable as it
presents a perspective on the pandemic's
impact and the necessary response. The bearing
effectively sets the tone for the essay.
In Part 1B of the worksheet, did the student
thoroughly explain why their stance was a good
choice? Did they give effective examples?
If you feel the paragraph was effective, please
explain why and how they can expand in moving
forward.
If you feel the stance needs work in any way,
please write suggestions for clarification your
classmate can make.
My classmate thoroughly explains why their
stance is a good choice: "This dangerous disease
has killed more than five million people
worldwide. The world is still dangerously
unprepared for the next pandemic threat."
These reasons, supported by examples such as
"People were not aware how dangerous this
disease was due to the lack of resources," make
this paragraph effective. To expand further, the
learner could probe into specific statistics or
case studies related to these points.
In Part 1C: Does the student present effective
opposing viewpoints?
Are the opposing viewpoints strongly presented?
If yes, how. If no, how could they improve on
them?
The student presents effective opposing
viewpoints, acknowledging that "For the most
part, anti-vaccine people will disagree on
vaccinating against this disease. I also feel that
the CDC will state that they provided all possible
resources to the citizen." While they briefly
mention these opposing views, providing more
©2021 Chamberlain University
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
detail or context for each viewpoint would make
them more robust.
Part 1D: Does the student effectively present
their audience?
If yes, who is their audience and how will this be
relevant to that population?
If no, who should the target audience be and
why?
The student effectively presents their audience,
identifying individuals affected by the disease
personally and those who lost loved ones to
COVID-19. This identification is relevant because
it highlights the audience's emotional and
personal connection to the topic, which can
engage them more deeply in the essay's
content.
Part 2: Did your classmate develop a 7-9 sentence
paragraph?
Did this paragraph explain what they understand
about the topic and what they will need to
research?
Yes, my classmate developed a 7-9 sentence
paragraph effectively. The paragraph explains
their current understanding of the topic,
including the impact of COVID-19, resource
disparities, sacrifices made by healthcare
workers, and the need for further research. The
presentation effectively sets the stage for the
investigation to come.
Part 3: Look at your classmate's list 5 possible
phrases to search?
Do you feel these are good search phrases? If yes,
why? If no, offer suggestions for helpful search
phrases.
My classmate's list of possible search phrases is
relevant and aligns with the goals of finding
opposing viewpoints, supporting viewpoints,
and filling knowledge gaps related to the COVID-
19 pandemic. These phrases cover critical
aspects like the pandemic, infectious diseases,
preparedness, and ending the pandemic, and
are a good starting point for research.
©2021 Chamberlain University
How to "Continue the Conversation" after
You've Posted Your Peer Reviews
You are required to make 3 total posts in each Writing Workshop:
·
Your main post, with your writing, according to instructions
·
Your one peer review for a classmate, using the Peer Review Sheet assigned
·
Your one "Continuing the Conversation" post, at least 3 sentences in length and following
the instructions and examples below
It is important to continue the conversation after you have posted your two required peer reviews for
many reasons:
·
To continue learning from your classmates
·
To offer more insight to your classmates
·
To explore in more depth some of the topics addressed
·
To ask questions
·
To answer questions
So, some examples of "Continue the Conversation" posts might be:
·
Hi Mary! I didn't review your work, but I did read through it. I have to say that I had never
considered the specific ways in which one might get a deadly infection doing simple activities at
home. It really made me think about watching my own little cuts and about how, before
antibiotics, the world was simply deadly.
Thank you! -Susan
·
Jeff, I noticed that you used details about roadblocks to getting basic jobs, and I don't know if
this will be helpful, but for women, there are additional issues. Some of those might include
....
(then you would offer some examples to Jeff) ….
I love your topic!
- Sally
·
Hey June! I hope you're having a good day. So, although I didn't do a formal peer review for
you, I was captivated by your topic of the benefits of having possums around your yard. I just
thought it was neat that you know so much that you don't have to look up information to
develop your whole essay. I understand; I know there are topics that we deal with in different
places; I just can't imagine growing up taking possums for granted.
Best, Mark
©2021 Chamberlain University
·
Fred, thank you so much for reviewing my prewriting! I'm glad you noticed that one of my
main ideas has far fewer examples than the other two. I sort of felt that way, too, and I'm going
to brainstorm more. Do you have a couple of ideas, or does anyone here- classmates, I'd love
some help!
Cheers! -Bruce
·
Hello, Francis! You are very welcome; it was my pleasure to review your writing. You asked
about why I thought your main ideas don't quite match, and that's a great question. This is just
my perspective as a reader, but I expected, from a topic like "types of chocolate," to see main
ideas like milk chocolate, dark chocolate, and baker's chocolate. I think that having three
countries who make good chocolate is an excellent approach; maybe change your overall topic
to match- like, "chocolate from different countries." I'm happy to discuss more!
Have a great day, Melanie
©2021 Chamberlain University
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help