Personal Narrative CEM 161

docx

School

Michigan State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

161

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by SargentWalrusPerson902

Report
Project 3 Personal Narrative: Food Dye Spectroscopy Anna Wroblewski Claim Our team is working for a discount beverage company that produces off-brand versions of popular sodas and fruit drinks. The United States has seven dyes that are approved for food, drug, and cosmetic (FD&C) products at low concentrations. We were given the UV-Vis absorbance spectrum for each of these seven dyes in our General Chemistry Laboratory Manual. Secondly we were given a 10mL sample of this new “name-brand” sports drink with two of these dyes in its concentration. Our goal as a team was to figure out which two dyes were in our given solution of this drink, find the absorption and concentration of the dyes, and recreate a 10mL solution to match as similar to the name-brand product as possible using the FD&C dyes as well as their profiles on the UV-Vis Absorbance Spectrum to replicate a similar beverage color profile. After we created our replicated solution we were tasked with testing the success of our solution on the UV-Visible spectroscopy machine. Resources Laboratory Technique Guides Diluting Solutions Measuring Liquids by Volume Standard Curves UV-Vis spectroscopy Statistics and Calculations (in Spreadsheets) Course Technology Guides Uploading Handwritten Contest to D2L Vernier Software and Devices Graphing (in Excel) Assignment Guides Experiment Preparation and Design Scientific Notebooks Scientific Reporting CATME Surveys Project Materials (10mL) Unknown beverage solution (25L) FD&C Blue #1 solution (25L) FD&C Red #3 solution RO/DI Water KimWipes PPE (2) 5.00 mL Serological pipet (2) 10.00 mL Serological pipet (2) Pipet filler (4) 10.00 mL Volumetric flask (1) Vernier Sensor Kit B (1) Vernier SpectroVis+ spectrophotometer (1) Plastic cuvette (1) Cuvette holder (1) USB-A/C cord (1) Power supply Evidence Goal 1 After we were given our 10 mL solution that we are trying to recreate, we had to set up our Vernier Sensor Kit B.This sensor kit is used to analyze the chemical properties of a material, in this case FD&C dye, by measuring the amount of UV or visible light wavelengths absorbed through a sample in comparison to our controlled sample. We first measured our control, RO/DI water in the machine by using a serological pipette to insert the water into the plastic cuvette that was included in the kit. After we got the absorbance and wavelength of our control, we moved on to measuring the given solution in the same way we measured the RO/DI water.
Figure 1: UV-Vis Absorbance Spectrum for Red #3 and Blue #1 dye. When we tested the 10 mL solution that was given to us the UV-Visible spectrophotometer machine gave us a graph. The first peak was at around 1.126 absorbance and a wavelength of 527.1 nm, and the second peak's absorbance was at 0.898 with a wavelength of 627.7 nm. Once we had the graph and the properties of the two peaks, we were able to compare it with the seven dye UV-Vis Absorbance Spectrum graphs in our General Chemistry Laboratory Manual (shown in figure 1 ). From here we found that the first peak from our given solution matched the absorbance and wavelength of dye Red #3 and the second peak matched that of dye Blue #1. With this information we were able to determine that these two dyes were present in our given solution, and we concluded that we only needed to use these two dyes in order to replicate the solution. Goal 2 After learning what two dyes were present in our given purple solution, we now needed to determine the concentration of the Red #3 and Blue #1 dyes within the 10 mL purple sample. In order to find the concentration within the purple solution, we needed to test for the concentration of each the Red #3 and Blue #1. We ran four tests on both Red #3 and Blue #1 that consisted of 2 mL dye and 8 mL RO/DI water, 4 mL dye and 6 mL RO/DI water, 6mL dye and 4 mL RO/DI water, and 8 mL dye and 2 mL RO/DI water. Once we gathered that information we used the equation M1V1 = M2V2 to solve for the concentration of each dye in the four tested solutions. Test Number Concentration of Dye Concentration of RO/DI Water Concentration of Red #3 Absorbance of Red #3 Concentration of Blue #1 Absorbance of Blue #1 Test 1 2 mL 8 mL 6.32x10^-7 0.492 1.712x10^-6 0.171 Test 2 4 mL 6 mL 1.264x10^-6 0.962 3.424x10^-7 0.371 Test 3 6 mL 4 mL 1.896x10^-6 1.243 5.136x10^-7 0.539 Test 4 8 mL 2 mL 2.528x10^-6 1.392 6.848x10^-7 0.718 Figure 2: represents the absorbance and concentration calculated from each of the 4 solutions with different concentrations of dye for each dye color. We graphed these numbers shown in Figure 2 on an excel spreadsheet and got a linear graph, which we then found the epsilon. The epsilon for Red #3 was 0.14905 and the epsilon of Blue #1 was 0.09054. Now that we have our , we used the equation C = A/ to find the Ɛ Ɛ concentration of each dye in our purple solution. From this equation, we learned that the concentration of Red #3 in the purple solution was 7.5545 and the concentration of Blue #1 was
9.928. Goal 3 Once we found the concentration of each dye in our purple solution we once again used the equation M1V2 = M2V2 in order to calculate the amount of blue and red dye we need to create a 10 mL replica solution(shown in Figure 3 ). From the numbers we gathered we put 0.9928 mL of Blue #1 into a volumetric flask and 0.7554 mL of Red #3 into the same volumetric Figure 3: shows the calculations that formed our answer for the amount of dye needed in our 10 mL replicated solution. flask and filled the rest of the flask with RO/DI water up to the 10 mL line. After creating the replica solution, we then tested it in the UV-Vis+ machine to see how close of a match it was to the initial purple solution that was given to us. We calculated the percent yield to find out how accurate the concentration of the dyes inside the replicated solution was. Figure 4 below shows how inaccurate our re-created solution was, although it had a similar color, the concentration of the amount of dye in both solutions was way off. We assumed that the inaccuracy of our results was due to human error, and mechanical difficulties from using the UV-Visible spectrophotometer. Figure 4: shows the percent yield of the concentration of dye in our replicated solutions compared to the concentration of dye that was in our given solution. Reasoning The absorption of light in terms of using the UV-Visible spectrophotometer machine is controlled by the certain characteristics of what is in a specific substance. For our experiment,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the absorption of light would be guided by the molecular characteristics of each of the dyes present in our tested solution. Within dyes there are systems of molecules that have singular, double and triple bonds which allow certain wavelengths of light to be absorbed and reflected. The colors that are absorbed are predetermined by the amount of energy each certain color, or dye, needs to absorb a photon of light. The relationship between the absorbed wavelength and the concentration of dye in a solution is described by the Beer-Lambert Law. This law states that the absorbance of light by a solution is directly proportional to the concentration of the absorbing substance and the path length of light through the solution: A = ε l c. A describes the absorbance of the solution, ε describes the molar absorptivity or the slope that we determined depicted in Figure 2 , l is the path length of light through the solution which in our case was one, and c which is the concentration of the absorbing dye. By using this equation we were able to determine the concentration of dyes in our given purple solution, and the concentration of the dyes in our replicated solution. As shown in Figure 4 our calculated concentration was very inaccurate when compared to concentration of dye in our given solution. While the color was very similar, there was an immense amount of more dye present in the given solution than our replicated solution. This could be due to the fact of the inevitability of human error as well as the difficulty our team had with the UV-Visible spectrophotometer. References 1. The General Chemistry Laboratory Manual (Fall 2023), Pages 102,105 2. Course Resources - UV-Visible Spectroscopy https://d2l.msu.edu/d2l/le/content/2037655/viewContent/14727097/View 3. Course Resources - Diluting Solutions https://d2l.msu.edu/d2l/le/content/2037655/viewContent/14727094/View 4. Assignment Guides - Scientific Reporting https://d2l.msu.edu/d2l/le/content/2037655/viewContent/14727075/View