Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors. The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D. The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue. The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017. To recommend: The board as a corporate governance consultant or a business ethics consultant, and steps to implement the recommendations.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter MC, Problem 20.2DQ

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company H is one of the largest technology companies in the world. Started in 2010, Company H is now one of the largest with revenue of $127 billion in 2011. Company H is a leading producer of desktop computers, laptops, printers, and computer hardware. The case explains the problems in Company H’s board of directors.

The problem began when the company started to violate the code of ethics after the death of its founder, Person H. The problem grew when the company’s confidential information was leaked in an anonymous article. Person D, the CEO of Company H, started the secret surveillance of board members and found the person who leaked the information. This issue led to the outbreak of a bigger problem, which led to the resignation of one of the members of the board and the termination of Person D.

The company then selected Person H as the new CEO under whom the company grew financially strong. However, Person H was filed a lawsuit by Person JF, who worked as a hostess at Company H-sponsored events, which made him resign. Next, the company appointed Person LA (as the CEO) who suggested focussing on enterprise software solutions business. The business constituted $25 billion and the hardware business grew to 40 percent of HP’s total revenue.

The board members fell victim to group thinking as Person RL, the board chair, supported Person AP. More problems arose when an outside firm proposed Person AP be the CEO which later led to step down of Person RL as chair of Company H’s board. Person MW, led the company as the CEO, and divided the business into hardware and another enterprise which performed decently in 2017.

To recommend: The board as a corporate governance consultant or a business ethics consultant, and steps to implement the recommendations.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

At the end of 2014, a large university hospital in the Netherlands launched a procurement tender exercise for surgical suture material. The rationale for hospital management to initiate this procedure was cost-cutting and standardization. The award criteria were focussed on the most economically advantageous tender. There were different suppliers on the market that were able to produce and deliver high-quality surgical suture material for a lower price than was currently being paid. Consequently, the tender was awarded to a new supplier.The top managers and purchasing manager who initiated the tender trod carefully and implemented this relatively small-scale change initiative according to some basic change management principles (e.g. Kotter, 2012): they built a guiding coalition that incorporated renowned medical specialists, they consulted department heads and they communicated the change to surgeons through different channels. Furthermore, it was recorded in the tender that the new…

an in depth summary on organizational change models with emphasis on kotter's change model

introductory information in paragraphs on organizational change models including kotter's change model. (Include sources)