Concept explainers
a)
Interpretation: Number of cannonballs, type of packing and type of regular geometry to be found.
Concept introduction
Closest packing: A metallic crystal containing spherical atom that are equally connected to each other in all direction. We can show such a structure by uniform packing in the way the sphere uses the vacant space. Closest packing are two types are Cubic close packing and Hexagonal close packing.
Cubic close packing: The arrangement of abc have cubic close packing. In this packing, unit cell made-up of four layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
Hexagonal close packing: In this packing, unit cell made-up of three layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
To explain total cannonballs needed.
b)
Interpretation: Number of cannonballs, type of packing and type of regular geometry to be found.
Concept introduction
Closest packing: A metallic crystal containing spherical atom that are equally connected to each other in all direction. We can show such a structure by uniform packing in the way the sphere uses the vacant space. Closest packing are two types are Cubic close packing and Hexagonal close packing.
Cubic close packing: The arrangement of abc have cubic close packing. In this packing, unit cell made-up of four layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
Hexagonal close packing: In this packing, unit cell made-up of three layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
To explain type of packing in cannonball.
c)
Interpretation: Number of cannonballs, type of packing and type of regular geometry to be found.
Concept introduction
Closest packing: A metallic crystal containing spherical atom that are equally connected to each other in all direction. We can show such a structure by uniform packing in the way the sphere uses the vacant space. Closest packing are two types are Cubic close packing and Hexagonal close packing.
Cubic close packing: The arrangement of abc have cubic close packing. In this packing, unit cell made-up of four layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
Hexagonal close packing: In this packing, unit cell made-up of three layers of atom. The top layer and bottom layer made-up of six atoms at hexagon’s corner and one at hexagon’s center.
To explain regular geometry of cannonball.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 9 Solutions
EBK CHEMISTRY: AN ATOMS FIRST APPROACH
- An amorphous solid can sometimes be converted to a crystalline solid by a process called annealing. Annealing consists of heating the substance to a temperature just below the melting point of the crystalline form and then cooling it slowly. Explain why this process helps produce a crystalline solid.arrow_forwardUsing circles, draw regular two-dimensional arrangements that demonstrate low packing efficiency and high packing efficiency.arrow_forwardWhy do liquids have a vapor pressure? Do all liquids have vapor pressures? Explain. Do solids exhibit vapor pressure? Explain. How does vapor pressure change with changing temperature? Explain.arrow_forward
- What feature characterizes the dynamic equilibrium between a liquid and its vapor in a closed container?arrow_forwardA common prank on college campuses is to switch the salt and sugar on dining hall tables. which is usually easy because the substances look so much alike. Yet, despite the similarity in their appearance, these two substances differ greatly in their properties because one is a molecular solid and the other is an ionic solid. How do the properties differ and why?arrow_forward8.45 Describe how interactions between molecules affect the vapor pressure of a liquid.arrow_forward
- A common prank on college campuses is to switch the salt and sugar on dining hall tables, which is usually easy because the substances look so much alike. Yet, despite the similarity in their appearance, these two substances differ greatly in their properties, since one is a molecular solid and the other is an ionic solid. How do the properties differ and why?arrow_forwardCalculate the percent of volume that is actually occupied by spheres in a face-centered cubic lattice of identical spheres. You can do this by first relating the radius of a sphere, r, to the length of an edge of a unit cell, l. (Note that the spheres do not touch along an edge but do touch along the diagonal of a face.) Then calculate the volume of a unit cell in terms of r. The volume occupied by spheres equals the number of spheres per unit cell times the volume of a sphere (4r3/3).arrow_forwardConsider the following data for xenon: Triple point: 121C, 280 torr Normal melting point: 112C Normal boiling point: 107C Which is more dense, Xe(s) or Xe(l)? How do the melting point and boiling point of xenon depend on pressure?arrow_forward
- Calculate the percent of volume that is actually occupied by spheres in a body-centered cubic lattice of identical spheres You can do this by first relating the radius of a sphere, r, to the length of an edge of a unit cell, l. (Note that the spheres do not touch along an edge but do touch along a diagonal passing through the body-centered sphere.) Then calculate the volume of a unit cell in terms of r. The volume occupied by spheres equals the number of spheres per unit cell times the volume of a sphere (4r3/3).arrow_forwardWhat are intermolecular forces? How do they differ from intramolecular forces? What are dipole-dipole forces? How do typical dipole-dipole forces differ from hydrogen bonding interactions? In what ways are they similar? What are London dispersion forces? How do typical London dispersion forces differ from dipole-dipole forces? In what ways are they similar? Describe the relationship between molecular size and strength of London dispersion forces. Place the major types of intermolecular forces in order of increasing strength. Is there some overlap? That is, can the strongest London dispersion forces be greater than some dipole-dipole forces? Give an example of such an instance.arrow_forward8.36 Why are dispersion forces attractive?arrow_forward
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: An Atoms First ApproachChemistryISBN:9781305079243Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. ZumdahlPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage LearningIntroductory Chemistry: A FoundationChemistryISBN:9781337399425Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningWorld of Chemistry, 3rd editionChemistryISBN:9781133109655Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Brooks / Cole / Cengage Learning