
Concept explainers
Summary:
A lawsuit was filed few years ago on Company MD’s drive through store when a customer spilled a hot cup of coffee on herself. She claimed that the coffee was too hot to be consumed inside a car.
The court made a decision in favor of the women and awarded her a compensation of $2.9 million. Company MD even pinpointed the caution given on the mugs but the plaintiff won the case just like so many earlier cases.
To explain: The way ethics and quality enter into these situations.

Answer to Problem 1ED
Ethics and quality of the product will come into consideration during these situations through different perspectives of different peoples.
Explanation of Solution
Way ethics and quality enter into these cases:
The ethical issue here is not exactly clear compared to any other case. Customers expect their coffee to be hot. Different customers will prefer different heat levels. It is not possible for the company to prepare coffee at different heats for different customers.
They can maintain a standard heat level while developing the coffee. The heat level will be in the middle range accepted by all the customers. The incident might have also been happened due to the inappropriate handling by the customer. There is also the possibility that the coffee was too hot than the standard industry levels.
The company must recognize the danger of hot coffee. But, a good quality coffee is developed with a very hot water. The quality is usually measured in the eyes of the customer. The manufacturing and product-based quality standards will be conforming to the company.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Principles Of Operations Management
- Provide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forwardWomen who ask for what they want in negotiation are less well-liked than women who do not self-advocate. However, nonassertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash and are regarded as less competent because their behavior is regarded to be _____ and _____. A. high-negative feminine; low-positive masculine B. high-positive feminine; high-positive masculine C. high-negative masculine; low-negative feminine D. low-positive masculine; low-positive femininearrow_forward
- There are five most recognized personality traits that can reliably be measured and predict negotiator behavior in a number of different situations. All of the following are one of those "Big 5" personality traits except _____. A. conscientiousness B. introversion C. agreeableness D. openness to experiencearrow_forwardWith regard to reputation in negotiation, negotiators who use adversarial, stubborn, and ethically questionable behavior often have the effect of _____. A. improving their business relationships B. decreasing their effectiveness as a negotiator C. improving their business relationships D. decreasing their group statusarrow_forwardWhen it comes to assertiveness, there is only a modest link between negotiators' self-views and how the counterparty sees them. Many negotiators come away from a negotiation thinking they came on too strong with the counterparty. The _____ refers to the fact that negotiators believe they are coming on too strong with the counterparty, but they actually are not. A. Collective trap illusion B. Attribution error C. Aggressive anchoring bias D. Line-crossing illusionarrow_forward
- As you think about the issue of using chatbots in contract negotiations, consider whether other facets and concepts of negotiations that we have discussed and whether they would be adequately addressed.arrow_forwardWhile I am not a fan of AI as of yet, I do understand the endless possibilities. Based on the research, it is clear that AI has great potential for negotiation (Yang, 2025). Herold et al. (2025) suggested that AI can flag potential risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to address them and mitigate potential problems proactively. AI can draft new contract templates by examining industry standards and past contracts, and AI technology can help lawyers spot errors and inconsistencies in contract drafts. In relation to risk management, AI can flag possible risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to proactively address them and lessen potential problems, which can speed up the negotiation process, making the negotiation efficient because AI can industrialize tasks like document review, redlining, and finding potential issues, significantly reducing negotiation time. Lastly, AI can analyze vast amounts of data and identify errors, inconsistencies, and irregularities in…arrow_forwardWhat is a main thought on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward
- What are some people thoughts on using AI in contract negotiations?arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: a. Risk Management Plan Focus on specific, actionable steps for each risk and mitigation strategy.Provide detailed timelines for procurement, stakeholder engagement, and risk monitoring.Avoid over-simplifying and add more technical details in areas like quality assurance and financial control measures. Add a risk prioritization method and mention how risks will be monitored and reviewed throughout the project lifecycle. Overall, it is well organized andc overs key risks.arrow_forward3. Develop a high-level or summary: Human Resource Management Plan Provide more concrete timelines and actionable steps for human resource management.Include more detailed risk management strategies and link them more explicitly to the overall project plan.Expand on how training and development will be evaluated and tracked.Also, the overall length is good, but some sections could be condensed by eliminating repetition (e.g., you discuss stakeholder communication and engagement in two sections without adding new information).Try not to repeat the same risk management ideas (e.g., resource sharing and stakeholder concerns) in multiple sections without adding value.arrow_forward
- Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage LearningFoundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...MarketingISBN:9781285193946Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning

