Crime Statistics The murder rate in large cities (over 1 million residents) can be related to that in smaller cities (500,000–1,000,000 residents) by the following linear model: y = 1.5 x − 1.9 ( 15 ≤ x ≤ 25 ) , where y is the murder rate (in murders per 100,000 residents each year) in large cities and x is the murder rate in smaller cities. During the period 1991–1998 the murder rate in small cities was decreasing at an average rate of 2 murders per 100,000 residents each year. Use the chain rule to estimate how fast the murder rate was changing in larger cities during that period. (Show how you used the chain rule in your answer.)
Crime Statistics The murder rate in large cities (over 1 million residents) can be related to that in smaller cities (500,000–1,000,000 residents) by the following linear model: y = 1.5 x − 1.9 ( 15 ≤ x ≤ 25 ) , where y is the murder rate (in murders per 100,000 residents each year) in large cities and x is the murder rate in smaller cities. During the period 1991–1998 the murder rate in small cities was decreasing at an average rate of 2 murders per 100,000 residents each year. Use the chain rule to estimate how fast the murder rate was changing in larger cities during that period. (Show how you used the chain rule in your answer.)
Solution Summary: The author explains how the murder rate in large cities can be related to that in smaller cities by the function y=1.5x-1.9.
Crime Statistics The murder rate in large cities (over 1 million residents) can be related to that in smaller cities (500,000–1,000,000 residents) by the following linear model:
y
=
1.5
x
−
1.9
(
15
≤
x
≤
25
)
,
where y is the murder rate (in murders per 100,000 residents each year) in large cities and x is the murder rate in smaller cities. During the period 1991–1998 the murder rate in small cities was decreasing at an average rate of 2 murders per 100,000 residents each year. Use the chain rule to estimate how fast the murder rate was changing in larger cities during that period. (Show how you used the chain rule in your answer.)
Use the properties of logarithms, given that In(2) = 0.6931 and In(3) = 1.0986, to approximate the logarithm. Use a calculator to confirm your approximations. (Round your answers to four decimal places.)
(a) In(0.75)
(b) In(24)
(c) In(18)
1
(d) In
≈
2
72
Find the indefinite integral. (Remember the constant of integration.)
√tan(8x)
tan(8x) sec²(8x) dx
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, calculus and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Solve ANY Optimization Problem in 5 Steps w/ Examples. What are they and How do you solve them?; Author: Ace Tutors;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfOSKc_sncg;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Types of solution in LPP|Basic|Multiple solution|Unbounded|Infeasible|GTU|Special case of LP problem; Author: Mechanical Engineering Management;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-D2WICq8Sk;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY