If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line. Concept Introduction: While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Kim and Park (2011) argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities not only have value for benefitting social causes but can also be regarded as recruiting tools for attracting potential employees who perceive the organization and its CSR activities as an ethical fit. The foundation of this argument comes from an organizational perspective that views employees as important assets for a corporation. Coming from this perspective would mean that corporations would be cognizant about the imperative to have an active CSR program that matches corporate values, missions, and cultures. Walmart Inc is the company of choice. What are Walmart Inc CSR activities? What do these activities communicate about Walmart Inc? Assess whether these activities are cause beneficial or cause exploitative? Give evidence for the answer. Would it be considered working for Walmart Inc?

The following cost data relate to the office overhead costs of Hamilton Accounting Services during the just-completed year: • Office rent: $32,400 Office supplies: $6,980 Utilities, office: $18,250 • Salary, office manager: $62,180 • Salary, receptionist: $40,560 • • Depreciation-office equipment: $13,750 Software licensing fees: $27,320 Other miscellaneous expenses: $35,600 Total overhead costs: $237,040 The company applies overhead costs using a predetermined overhead rate of $7 per accountant hour. A total of 36,200 accountant hours was recorded for the year. Compute the amount of under- or overapplied overhead cost for the year.

Describe the need for financial reports for the following stakeholders.a. The Community (3 marks)b. Creditors (4 marks)

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Answer 6

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Answer 7

Chapter 4, Problem 1DQ

Summary Introduction

To discuss:

If it is reasonable to expect that managers can measure their social and environmental performance on the same level as they measure financial performance with a triple bottom line.

Concept Introduction:

While measuring an organization's social, environmental and financial performance is referred as the term triple bottom line. This is also called as three Ps: People, Planet and Profit.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

In terms of monetary measures like sales growth, revenue earned, return on assets, net profit etc. But it is not a straight forward task to measure social and environmental performance. It is not possible for the managers to measure exactly their environmental and social performance on the same level as of financial performance.

Impact of the organization on the community is referred to as social performance which includes employee welfare, adhering to government laws, customer treatment, and charitable contributions etc. On all kind of stakeholders associated with it is impacted by the organization. Impact on whom is to be measured; employees, their families, suppliers, people surrounding company's building. The families of employees would be affected if employees do not take proper care of its employees.

The amount of natural resources used like material, water, energy and land is referred to as environmental performance. By-products of production activities like air emissions, excessive nutrients, waste etc are also included in this.

It would be a good initiative to be counted, if the company has taken initiative to plant green trees, reducing energy consumption etc. But how to count it in terms of money saving, percentage saving or comparing to other companies in the industry is difficult.

So there is a long list of factors, out of them which priority factors need to be considered for performance measurement needs to be decided by the manager. It is important for the manager to measure all three performance of the organization so that the business remains sustainable in the long run because profits cannot be earned at the cost of society and natural environment. In terms of an index that helps in comparing performance between companies is one of the methods to calculate the Triple bottom line.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 4 - Prob. 1DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 2DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 3DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 4DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 5DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 6DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 7DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 8DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 9DQ Ch. 4 - Prob. 10DQ

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions