To prove: that division of rational number is not commutative.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Choose two fractions and use an area model or number line to show the division of rational numbers is not commutative.
Proof:
Choose two rational fractions as
Divide
This number line represents
And the quotient is 3.
This number line represents
Here the denominator is greater than the nominator therefore the quotient is less than 1, hence quotient in both cases is not same.
Therefore,
It is obtained that the division of rational numbers is not commutative.
Chapter 3 Solutions
Glencoe Math Accelerated, Student Edition
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
College Algebra with Modeling & Visualization (5th Edition)
Algebra and Trigonometry (6th Edition)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th Edition)
University Calculus: Early Transcendentals (4th Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (2nd Edition)
A Problem Solving Approach To Mathematics For Elementary School Teachers (13th Edition)
- Find the equation of the line / in the figure below. Give exact values using the form y = mx + b. m = b = y WebAssign Plot f(x) = 10* log 9 Xarrow_forwardA particle travels along a straight line path given by s=9.5t3-2.2t2-4.5t+9.9 (in meters). What time does it change direction? Report the higher of the answers to the nearest 2 decimal places in seconds.arrow_forwardUse the method of disks to find the volume of the solid that is obtained when the region under the curve y = over the interval [4,17] is rotated about the x-axis.arrow_forward
- 1. Find the area of the region enclosed between the curves y = x and y = x. Sketch the region.arrow_forwardfor the given rectangular coordinates, find two sets of polar coordinates for which 0≤θ<2π, one with r>0 and the other with r<0. (-2sqrt(3),9)arrow_forwardI circled the correct answer, could you show me how to do it using divergence and polar coordinatesarrow_forward
- The correct answer is D Could you explain and show the steps pleasearrow_forwardTaylor Series Approximation Example- H.W More terms used implies better approximation f(x) 4 f(x) Zero order f(x + 1) = f(x;) First order f(x; + 1) = f(x;) + f'(x;)h 1.0 Second order 0.5 True f(x + 1) = f(x) + f'(x)h + ƒ"(x;) h2 2! f(x+1) 0 x; = 0 x+1 = 1 x h f(x)=0.1x4-0.15x³- 0.5x2 -0.25x + 1.2 51 Taylor Series Approximation H.w: Smaller step size implies smaller error Errors f(x) + f(x,) Zero order f(x,+ 1) = f(x) First order 1.0 0.5 Reduced step size Second order True f(x + 1) = f(x) + f'(x)h f(x; + 1) = f(x) + f'(x)h + "(xi) h2 f(x,+1) O x₁ = 0 x+1=1 Using Taylor Series Expansion estimate f(1.35) with x0 =0.75 with 5 iterations (or & s= 5%) for f(x)=0.1x 0.15x³-0.5x²- 0.25x + 1.2 52arrow_forwardCould you explain this using the formula I attached and polar coorindatesarrow_forward
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781285741550Author:James StewartPublisher:Cengage LearningThomas' Calculus (14th Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134438986Author:Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. WeirPublisher:PEARSONCalculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134763644Author:William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric SchulzPublisher:PEARSON
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781319050740Author:Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert FranzosaPublisher:W. H. FreemanCalculus: Early Transcendental FunctionsCalculusISBN:9781337552516Author:Ron Larson, Bruce H. EdwardsPublisher:Cengage Learning