REVEL for Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis -- Access Card (16th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
16th Edition
ISBN: 9780134789705
Author: Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 19, Problem 19.28E
Nonfinancial measures of quality, manufacturing cycle efficiency. (CMA, adapted) Turnkey Manufacturing evaluates the performance of its production managers based on a variety of factors, including cost, quality, and cycle time. The following are nonfinancial measures for quality and time for 2016 and 2017 for its only product:
| Nonfinancial Quality Measures | 2016 | 2017 |
| Number of returned goods | 500 | 1,000 |
| Number of defective units reworked | 2,500 | 2,000 |
| Annual hours spent on quality training per employee | 36 | 54 |
| Number of units delivered on time | 20,000 | 34,000 |
| Annual Totals | 2016 | 2017 |
| Units of finished goods shipped | 25,000 | 1,800 |
| Average total hours worked per employee | 40,000 | 1,800 |
The following information relates to the average amount of time needed to complete an order:
| Time to Complete an Order | 2016 | 2017 |
| Wait time | ||
| From customer placing order to order being received by production | 14 | 10 |
| From order received by production to machine being set up for production | 9 | 7 |
| Inspection time | 5 | 3 |
| Process time | 4 | 4 |
| Move time | 2 | 2 |
- 1. Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency for an order for 2016 and 2017.
Required
- 2. For each year 2016 and 2017, calculate the following:
- a. Percentage of goods returned
- b. Defective units reworked as a percentage of units shipped
- c. Percentage of on-time deliveries
- d. Percentage of hours spent by each employee on quality training
- 3. Evaluate management’s performance on quality and timeliness in 2016 and 2017.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
For each year 2016 and 2017, Percentage of goods returned
Compute the manufacturing cycle efficiency for an order for 2016 and 2017.
For each year 2016 and 2017 Defective units reworked as a percentage of units shipped
Chapter 19 Solutions
REVEL for Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis -- Access Card (16th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
Ch. 19 - Describe two benefits of improving quality.Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.2QCh. 19 - Name two items classified as prevention costs.Ch. 19 - Give two examples of appraisal costs.Ch. 19 - Distinguish between internal failure costs and...Ch. 19 - Describe three methods that companies use to...Ch. 19 - Companies should focus on financial measures of...Ch. 19 - Give two examples of nonfinancial measures of...Ch. 19 - Give two examples of nonfinancial measures of...Ch. 19 - When evaluating alternative ways to improve...
Ch. 19 - Distinguish between customer-response time and...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.12QCh. 19 - Give two reasons why delays occur.Ch. 19 - Companies should always make and sell all products...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.15QCh. 19 - Rector Corporation is examining its quality...Ch. 19 - Six Sigma is a continuous quality improvement...Ch. 19 - Costs of quality. (CMA, adapted) Osborn, Inc.,...Ch. 19 - Costs of quality analysis. Adirondack Company...Ch. 19 - Costs-of-quality analysis. Safe Travel produces...Ch. 19 - Costs of quality, quality improvement. iCover...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.22ECh. 19 - Prob. 19.23ECh. 19 - Waiting time. Its a Dogs World (IDW) makes toys...Ch. 19 - Waiting time, service industry. The registration...Ch. 19 - Waiting time, cost considerations, customer...Ch. 19 - Nonfinancial measures of quality and time. For the...Ch. 19 - Nonfinancial measures of quality, manufacturing...Ch. 19 - Statistical quality control. Harvest Cereals...Ch. 19 - Quality improvement, Pareto diagram,...Ch. 19 - Quality improvement, relevant costs, and relevant...Ch. 19 - Quality improvement, relevant costs, and relevant...Ch. 19 - Waiting times, manufacturing cycle times. The...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.34PCh. 19 - Manufacturing cycle times, relevant revenues, and...Ch. 19 - Compensation linked with profitability, waiting...Ch. 19 - Ethics and quality. Weston Corporation...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.38P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Nonnancial measures of quality and time. For the past two years, Worldwide Cell Phones (WCP) has been working to improve the quality of its phones. Data for 2016 and 2017 follows (in thousands of phones):arrow_forwardFor each year, 2016 and 2017, calculate the Manufacturing cycle time as a percentage of total time from order to deliveryarrow_forwardFor each year, 2016 and 2017, calculate the Percentage of defective units shippedarrow_forward
- Q.Suppose Calvert could eliminate all errors so that it did not need to spend any time making corrections and, as a result, could proportionately reduce professional-labor costs. Calculate Calvert’s operating income for 2017.arrow_forwardNabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 20x5, as given below. At the zero-defect state, Nabors expects to spend 375,000 on quality engineering, 75,000 on vendor certification, and 50,000 on packaging inspection. Assume sales to be 25,000,000. Required: 1. Prepare a long-range performance report for 20x5. What does this report tell the management of Nabors? 2. Explain why quality costs still are present for the zero-defect state. 3. What if Nabors achieves the zero-defect state reflected in the report? What are some of the implications of this achievement?arrow_forwardIn 20X1, Don Blackburn, president of Price Electronics, received a report indicating that quality costs were 31% of sales. Faced with increasing pressures from imported goods. Don resolved to take measures to improve the overall quality of the companys products. After hiring a consultant in 20X1, the company began an aggressive program of total quality control. At the end of 20X5, Don requested an analysis of the progress the company had made in reducing and controlling quality costs. The accounting department assembled the following data: Required: 1. Compute the quality costs as a percentage of sales by category and in total for each year. 2. Prepare a multiple-year trend graph for quality costs, both by total costs and by category. Using the graph, assess the progress made in reducing and controlling quality costs. Does the graph provide evidence that quality has improved? Explain. 3. Using the 20X1 quality cost relationships (assume all costs are variable), calculate the quality costs that would have prevailed in 20X4. By how much did profits increase in 20X4 because of the quality improvement program? Repeat for 20X5.arrow_forward
- CMA-ADAPTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES The Star Paper Division of Royal Industries is located near Los Angeles. A major expansion of the divisions only plant was completed in April 2015. The expansion consisted of an addition to the existing building, additions to the production line machinery, and the replacement of obsolete and fully depreciated equipment that was no longer efficient or cost-effective. On May 1, 2015, George Harris became manager of Star. Harris had a meeting with Marie Fortner, vice president of operations for Royal, who explained to Harris that the company measured the performance of divisions and division managers on the basis of return on gross assets (ROA). When Harris asked if other measures were used in conjunction with ROA, Fortner replied, Royals top management prefers to use a single performance measure. Star should do well this year now that it has expanded and replaced all of that old equipment. You should have no problem exceeding the divisions historical rate. Ill check with you at the end of each quarter to see how you are doing. Fortner called Harris after the first quarter results were completed because Stars ROA was considerably below the historical rate for the division. Harris told Fortner that he did not believe that ROA was a valid performance measure for Star. Fortner indicated that she would discuss this with others at headquarters and get back to Harris. However, there was no further discussion of the use of ROA but only reports on divisional performance at the end of the second and third quarters. Now that the fiscal year has ended, Harris has received the memorandum in the figure designated for Problem 14. PROBLEM 14: PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO: George Harris, Star Paper Division FROM: Marie Fortner, Royal Industries SUBJECT: Divisional Performance The operating results for the fourth quarter and for our fiscal year ended on April 30 are now complete. Your fourth quarter return on gross assets was only 9 percent, resulting in a return for the year of slightly under 11 percent. I recall discussing your low return after the first quarter and reminding you after the second and third quarters that this level of return is not considered adequate for the Star Paper Division. The return on gross assets at Star has ranged from 15 to 18 percent for the past five years. An 11 percent return may be acceptable at some of Royals other divisions, but not at a proven winner like Star, especially in light of your recently improved facility. Please arrange to meet with me in the near future to discuss ways to restore Stars return on gross assets to its former level. Harris is looking forward to meeting with Fortner as he plans to pursue the discussion about the appropriateness of ROA as a performance measure for Star. While the ROA for Star is below historical levels, the divisions profits for the year are higher than at any previous time. Harris is going to recommend that ROA be replaced with multiple criteria for evaluating performancenamely, dollar profit, receivable turnover, and inventory turnover. Required a. Identify general criteria that should be used in selecting performance measures to evaluate operating managers. b. Describe the probable cause of the decline in the Star Paper Divisions return on gross assets during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007. c. On the basis of the relationship between Fortner and Harris, as well as the memorandum from Fortner, discuss apparent weaknesses in the performance evaluation process at Royal Industries. d. Discuss whether the multiple performance evaluation criteria that Harris suggested would be appropriate for the evaluation of the Star Paper Division.arrow_forwardIn 2011, Milton Thayne, president of Carbondale Electronics, received a report indicating that quality costs were 31 percent of sales. Faced with increasing pressures from imported goods, Milton resolved to take measures to improve the overall quality of the companys products. After hiring a consultant in 20x0, the company began an aggressive program of total quality control. At the end of 20x5, Milton requested an analysis of the progress the company had made in reducing and controlling quality costs. The Accounting Department assembled the following data: Required: 1. Compute the quality costs as a percentage of sales by category and in total for each year. 2. Prepare a multiple-year trend graph for quality costs, both by total costs and by category. Using the graph, assess the progress made in reducing and controlling quality costs. Does the graph provide evidence that quality has improved? Explain. 3. Using the 20x1 quality cost relationships (assume all costs are variable), calculate the quality costs that would have prevailed in 20x4. By how much did profits increase in 20x4 because of the quality improvement program? Repeat for 20x5.arrow_forwardRizzo Goal Inc. produces and sells hockey equipment, often custom made for online orders. The company has the following performance metrics on its balanced scorecard: days from ordered to delivered, number of shipping errors, customer retention rate, and market share. A measure map illustrates that the days from ordered to delivered and the number of shipping errors are both expected to directly affect the customer retention rate, which affects market share. Additional internal analysis finds that: Every shipping error over three shipping errors per month reduces the customer retention rate by 1.5%. On average, each day above three days from ordered to delivered yields a reduction in the customer retention rate of 1%. Each day before three days from order to delivery yields an increase in the customer retention rate of 1%, on average. Rizzo Goal Inc.s current customer retention rate is 60%. The company estimates that for every 1% increase or decrease in the customer retention rate, market share changes 0.5% in the same direction. Rizzo Goal Inc.s current market share is 21.4%. Ignoring any other factors, if the company has six shipping errors this month and an average of 3.5 days from ordered to delivered, determine (a) the new customer retention rate and (b) the new market share that Rizzo Goal Inc. expects to have.arrow_forward
- please complete entirelyarrow_forwardStrategy, balanced scorecard, service company. Compton Associates is an architectural rm that has been in practice only a few years. Because it is a relatively new rm, the market for the rm’s services is very competitive. To compete successfully, Compton must deliver quality services at a low cost. Compton presents the following data for 2016 and 2017.arrow_forwardPlease helparrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
Principles of Cost AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305087408Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. MitchellPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337902663
Author:WARREN, Carl S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Principles of Cost Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781305087408
Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337115773
Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Inspection and Quality control in Manufacturing. What is quality inspection?; Author: Educationleaves;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey4MqC7Kp7g;License: Standard youtube license