Target operating income, value-added costs, service company. Calvert Associates prepares architectural drawings to conform to local structural-safety codes. Its income statement for 2017 is as follows: $701,250 390,000 Revenues Salaries of professional staff (7,500 hours x $52 per hour) Travel 15,000 Administrative and support costs 171,600 576,600 Total costs Operating income $124,650 The percentage of time spent by professional staff on various activities follows: 77% Making calculations and preparing drawings for clients Checking calculations and drawings Correcting errors found in drawings (not billed to clients) Making changes in response to client requests (billed to clients) Correcting own errors regarding building codes (not billed to clients) 3 5 Total 100% Assume administrative and support costs vary with professional-labor costs.

Target operating income, value-added costs, service company. Calvert Associates prepares architectural drawings to conform to local structural-safety codes. Its income statement for 2017 is as follows: $701,250 390,000 Revenues Salaries of professional staff (7,500 hours x $52 per hour) Travel 15,000 Administrative and support costs 171,600 576,600 Total costs Operating income $124,650 The percentage of time spent by professional staff on various activities follows: 77% Making calculations and preparing drawings for clients Checking calculations and drawings Correcting errors found in drawings (not billed to clients) Making changes in response to client requests (billed to clients) Correcting own errors regarding building codes (not billed to clients) 3 5 Total 100% Assume administrative and support costs vary with professional-labor costs.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

I also have some confuse for the decision: system B is more beneficial then system A due to lower negative NPV from system A. Should we need compare with negative NPV or cost per year? For negative NPV, system A ($541,843)is lower negative NPV than system B($706,984.82). On the other hand, system B ($167,116.14) is lower cost of each year than system A ($174,652.85). Thank you ~
Which analysis involves a comparison of the cost of operating additional robotic tailors with additional revenues generated by increased product sales?
Your answer is incorrect. Divide the estimated average annual income by the average investment. Investment cost plus residual value, divided by two, equals average investment. Can you please redo it? Thanks
The relevant range refers to: Select one: Ⓒa. a particular range of production where cost behavior remains the same. b. a particular range of production wherein fixed costs remain constant. c. a particular range of production where total contribution margin remains the same. d. a particular range of production where no mixed costs are incurred. Q Search with Bing 0 ***
Select all that are true with respect to comparing machines with unequal lives - i.e., choosing the best machine for the project. Group of answer choices If you simply estimate NPV without accounting for the different lives, NPV may lead to an incorrect decision You cannot use NPV to make this decision If you estimate NPV CORRECTLY, it will lead you to the correct decision One way to handle this type of decision, is to use what is called "equivalent annual cost" (EAC), which is essentially the all-in annual economic cost of the machine Estimate equivalent annual cost (EAC) by taking the NPV of the machine and dividing by its useful life
Can you please explain the statement with an example? Also, check whether my understanding of the example is correct. "If using the same unit fixed costs at different output levels, managers may reach erroneous conclusions. Total fixed costs should be used." My Understanding: For example, if the capacity is 1000 and currently we produce 1000 units and sell it for $20 per unit, variable cost $5 and the fixed cost $10 per unit (within the relevant range); and we have a special order to produce 1200 units for $8 per unit. Should we include additional the Total Fixed Cost of $10000, which is (10*1000) for the range (1001-2000) plus $10000 for the range (0-1000), which means, we will have a total fixed cost of $20000.