There are very large numbers of charged particles in most objects. Why, then, don't most objects exhibit static electricity?
The reason because of which most objects don't have static electricity.
Explanation of Solution
Static electricity
The study of charges at rest is known as static electricity.
For the object to have electricity at rest, the object must have certain amount of charge on it.
As we know that the composition of a matter is of number of atom and atom also consist of number of revolving electrons which are negatively charged around the nucleus in designated orbits.
Nucleus of the atom is of very small in size of about
The nucleus of the atoms consists of uncharged or neutral particles called neutrons and the charged particles protons that are charged positively.
Due to the presence of nuclear force which is strong in nature inside the atom the particles are held strongly with the nucleus.
As in an atom in stable state, the protons must be equal to the electrons in it.
Due to the magnitude value of electron charge is equal to that of magnitude value of proton. Thus, the resultant charge on atom is zero and it does not have any charge and is neutral electrically.
An atom is considered of having a charge when if it loses or release an electron, or it accepts electron. If it releases electron, then the charge on the atom gets positive and if it gains the negatively charged particle that is electron then it becomes negative charge.
That in turns results in the existence of static electricity in it.
Since, even if an object is having atoms in large number in it, it still does not have static electricity, because to have electricity in static terms the object will have some resultant charge, that is not the case with the object having no charge.
Conclusion:
Since, even if an object is having atoms in large number in it, it still does not have static electricity, because to have electricity in static terms the object will have some resultant charge, which does not the case with the object having no charge.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
College Physics
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Human Anatomy & Physiology (2nd Edition)
Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd Edition)
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (3rd Edition)
Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach (8th Edition)
Campbell Essential Biology (7th Edition)
Applications and Investigations in Earth Science (9th Edition)
- 3. A measurement taken from the UW Jacobson Observatory (Latitude: 47.660503°, Longitude: -122.309424°, Altitude: 220.00 feet) when its local sidereal time is 120.00° makes the following observations of a space object (Based on Curtis Problems 5.12 + 5.13): Azimuth: 225.00° Azimuth rate: 2.0000°/s. Elevation: 75.000° Elevation rate: -0.5000°/s Range: 1500.0 km Range rate: -1.0000 km/s a. What are the r & v vectors (the state vector) in geocentric coordinates? (Answer r = [-2503.47 v = [17.298 4885.2 5.920 5577.6] -2.663]) b. Calculate the orbital elements of the satellite. (For your thoughts: what type of object would this be?) (Partial Answer e = 5.5876, 0=-13.74°) Tip: use Curtis algorithms 5.4 and 4.2.arrow_forwardConsider an isotope with an atomic number of (2(5+4)) and a mass number of (4(5+4)+2). Using the atomic masses given in the attached table, calculate the binding energy per nucleon for this isotope. Give your answer in MeV/nucleon and with 4 significant figures.arrow_forwardA: VR= 2.4 cm (0.1 V/cm) = 0.24 V What do Vector B an C represent and what are their magnitudesarrow_forward
- 4. Consider a cubesat that got deployed below the ISS and achieved a circular orbit of 410 km altitude with an inclination of 51.600°. What is the spacing, in kilometers, between successive ground tracks at the equator: a. Ignoring J2 (Earth's oblateness) effects b. Accounting for J2 effects c. Compare the two results and comment [Partial Answer: 35.7km difference]arrow_forwardplease solve and explainarrow_forwardTwo ice skaters, both of mass 68 kgkg, approach on parallel paths 1.6 mm apart. Both are moving at 3.0 m/sm/s with their arms outstretched. They join hands as they pass, still maintaining their 1.6 mm separation, and begin rotating about one another. Treat the skaters as particles with regard to their rotational inertia. a) What is their common angular speed after joining hands? Express your answer in radians per second. b) Calculate the change in kinetic energy for the process described in a). Express your answer with the appropriate units. c) If they now pull on each other’s hands, reducing their radius to half its original value, what is their common angular speed after reducing their radius? Express your answer in radians per second. d) Calculate the change in kinetic energy for the process described in part c). Express your answer with the appropriate units.arrow_forward
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegePrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers, Technology ...PhysicsISBN:9781305116399Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning