Transferred-in costs, FIFO method. Refer to the information in Exercise 17-31. Suppose that Trendy uses the FIFO method instead of the weighted-average method in all of its departments. The only changes to Exercise 17-31 under the FIFO method are that total transferred-in costs of beginning work in process on June 1 are $45,000 (instead of $60,000) and total transferred-in costs added during June are $114,000 (instead of $117,000).
Required
Do Exercise 17-31 using the FIFO method. Note that you first need to calculate equivalent units of work done in the current period (for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs) to complete beginning work in process, to start and complete new units, and to produce ending work in process.
17-31 Transferred-in costs, weighted-average method. Trendy Clothing, Inc. is a manufacturer of winter clothes. It has a knitting department and a finishing department. This exercise focuses on the finishing department. Direct materials are added at the end of the process. Conversion costs are added evenly during the process. Trendy uses the weighted-average method of
- 1. Calculate equivalent units of transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs.
Required
- 2. Summarize the total costs to account for, and calculate the cost per equivalent unit for transferred-in costs, direct materials, and conversion costs.
- 3. Assign costs to units completed (and transferred out) and to units in ending work in process.
Learn your wayIncludes step-by-step video
Chapter 17 Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting, Student Value Edition (16th Edition)
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Managerial Accounting (4th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (11th Edition)
Managerial Accounting (5th Edition)
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Intermediate Accounting (2nd Edition)
Intermediate Accounting
- Refer to the data in Exercise 7.18. When the capacity of the HR Department was originally established, the normal usage expected for each department was 20,000 direct labor hours. This usage is also the amount of activity planned for the two departments in Year 1 and Year 2. Required: 1. Allocate the costs of the HR Department using the direct method and assuming that the purpose is product costing. 2. Allocate the costs of the HR Department using the direct method and assuming that the purpose is to evaluate performance.arrow_forwardOn April 30, the end of the first month of operations, Joplin Company prepared the following income statement, based on the absorption costing concept: If the fixed manufacturing costs were 450,000 and the fixed selling and administrative expenses were 165,000, prepare an income statement according to the variable costing concept.arrow_forwardThe following product costs are available for Kellee Company on the production of eyeglass frames: direct materials, $32,125; direct labor, $23.50; manufacturing overhead, applied at 225% of direct labor cost; selling expenses, $22,225; and administrative expenses, $31,125. The direct labor hours worked for the month are 3,200 hours. A. What are the prime costs? B. What are the conversion costs? C. What is the total product cost? D. What is the total period cost? E. If 6.425 equivalent units are produced, what is the equivalent material cost per unit? F. What is the equivalent conversion cost per unit?arrow_forward
- The Jordan Company operates three producing departments, X, Y and Z. it uses the weighted average costing method. The following data are on the production of Department Y for August, 2018: Units Added in Department X Transfer in Materials Conversion Cost In process, Aug. 1 Received from Dept. X 5,000 20,000 9,990 39,010 1,020 21,855 998 21,877 Total 25,000 Transferred out 19,000 Normal loss 1,000 Abnormal loss 500 In process, Aug. 31 4,500 Factory costs are applied evenly throughout the process. Beginning work in process was 20% done while ending work in process is % done. Abnormal loss occurred at the end of the process. What should be the accumulated cost of work in process as of August 31 if the normal loss occurred during the process (with adjustment for the lost units based in the remaining good units?arrow_forwardHakara Company has been using direct labor costs as the basis for assigning overhead to its many products. Under this allocation system, product A has been assigned overhead of $26.87 per unit, while product B has been assigned $7.62 per unit. Management feels that an ABC system will provide a more accurate allocation of the overhead costs and has collected the following cost pool and cost driver information: Cost Pools Activity Costs $ 415,000 120,000 44,000 The following cost information pertains to the production of A and B, just two of Hakara's many products: Machine setup Materials handling Electric power Number of units produced Direct materials cost Direct labor cost Number of setup hours Pounds of materials used Kilowatt-hours Product A Product B A 5,000 $ 22,000 $ 39,000 Cost per Unit Cost Drivers Setup hours Pounds of materials Kilowatt-hours 200 2,000 4,000 B 20,000 $ 26,000 $ 37,000 Activity Driver Consumption 5,000 15,000 22,000 200 2,000 4,000 Required: 1. Use…arrow_forward5) Bauer Manufacturing uses departmental cost driver rates to allocate manufacturing overhead costs to products. Manufacturing overhead costs are allocated on the basis of machine-hours in the Machining Department and on the basis of direct labor-hours in the Assembly Department. At the beginning of 2018, the following estimates were provided for the coming year: Direct labor-hours Machine-hours Direct labor cost Manufacturing overhead costs Machining Assembly 80,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 $550,000 $900,000 $480,000 $280,000 The accounting records of the company show the following data for Job #316: Direct labor-hours Machine-hours Direct material cost Direct labor cost Machining 120 Assembly 55 50 5 $250 $150 $125 $375 What are the total manufacturing costs of Job #316? A) $1,885.00 B) $2,085.00 C) $2,485.00 D) $900.00arrow_forward
- Vaiarrow_forwardComputing departmental overhead allocation rates The Oakman Company (see Short Exercise S19-1) has refined its allocation system by separating manufacturing overhead costs into two cost pools—one for each department. The estimated costs for the Mixing Department, $510,000, will be allocated based on direct labor hours, and the estimated direct labor hours for the year are 170,000. The estimated costs for the Packaging Department, $300,000, will be allocated based on machine-hours, and the estimated machine hours for the year are 40,000. In October, the company incurred 38,000 direct labor hours in the Mixing Department and 10,000 machine hours in the Packaging Department. Requirements Compute the predetermined overhead allocation rates. Round to two decimal places. Determine the total amount of overhead allocated in October.arrow_forward1. Determine the total estimated overhead cost for each of the producing departments after allocating the cost of the service department. A. Using employee headcount as the allocation base. B. Using occupied space as the allocation base. C. Using productive capacity as the allocation base. D. Using the 3-year average use as the allocation base.arrow_forward
- 1. Logo Inc. has two data services departments (Systems and Facilities) that provide support to the company's three production departments (Machining, Assembly, and Finishing). The overhead costs of the Systems Department are allocated to other departments on the basis of computer usage hours. The overhead costs of the Facilities Department are allocated based on square feet occupied (in thousands). Other information pertaining to Logo is as follows. Department Overhead Computer Usage Hours Square Feet Occupied Systems Facilities $200,000 300 1,000 100,000 900 600 Machining Assembly Finishing Totals 400,000 3,600 2,000 550,000 1,800 3,000 620,000 2,700 5,000 9,300 11,600arrow_forwardHakara Company has been using direct labor costs as the basis for assigning overhead to its many products. Under this allocation system, product A has been assigned overhead of $31.58 per unit, while product B has been assigned $8.69 per unit. Management feels that an ABC system will provide a more accurate allocation of the overhead costs and has collected the following cost pool and cost driver information: Activity Costs $ 198,000 Activity Driver Consumption 2,000 21,000 168,000 40,000 40,000 The following cost information pertains to the production of A and B, just two of Hakara's many products: Cost Pools Machine setup Materials handling Electric power Number of units produced Direct materials cost Direct labor cost. Number of setup hours Pounds of materials used Kilowatt-hours Product A Product B A 4,000 $ 31,000 $ 33,000 Cost per Unit 200 1,000 4,000 Cost Drivers Setup hours Pounds of materials Kilowatt-hours Required: 1. Use activity-based costing to determine a unit cost for…arrow_forwardMission Company is preparing its annual profit plan. As part of its analysis of the profitability of individual products, the controller estimates the amount of overhead that should be allocated to the individual product lines from the information provided below (CMA adapted) Multiple Choice Units produced Material moves per product line Direct labor-hours per product line Budgeted material handling costs: $594,000 Under a traditional costing system that allocates overhead on the basis of direct labor-hours, the materials handling costs allocated to one unit of Wall Mirrors would be O $1000 $1.350 $5,400 Wall Mirrors 210 5 1,050 $22.000 Specialty Nindows 25 46arrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeManagerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub
- Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Principles of Cost AccountingAccountingISBN:9781305087408Author:Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. MitchellPublisher:Cengage Learning