Concept explainers
Grace Greenberg, production planner for Science and Technology Labs, in New Jersey, has the master production plan shown below:
Lead time = 1 period; setup cost = $200; holding cost = $10 per week; stockout cost = $10 per week. Develop an ordering plan and costs for Grace, using these techniques:
a) Lot-for-lot.
b) EOQ.
c) POQ.
d) Which plan has the lowest cost?
a)

To determine: The ordering plan and cost for Lot for lot.
Introduction:
Lot for Lot:
The lot for lot method of requirements plan is the process where the planned order release will be equal to the net requirement of the period.
Net requirements plan:
The net requirements plan is the plan which is established on the gross requirements plan formed by deducting the stock on and the scheduled receipts. If the total requirement is below the safety stock levels, a planned order is made based on the given lot sizing technique.
Answer to Problem 27P
The cost for Lot for lot is $1,200.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 |
Holding cost = $10 / week
Setup cost = $200
Lead time = 1 period
Stockout cost = $10 / week
Lot for lot:
Net requirements plan:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 | ||||||
Scheduled receipt | |||||||||||||
On hand (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Ending inventory | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Net requirement | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | |||||||
Planned order receipt | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | |||||||
Planned order release | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 |
Week 2:
The gross requirement is 35 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 35. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 35 in week 1 which will be the planned order receipt in week 2.
Week 4:
The gross requirement is 40 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 40. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 40 in week 3 which will be the planned order receipt in week 4.
Week 6:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 10. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 10 in week 5 which will be the planned order receipt in week 6.
Week 9:
The gross requirement is 25 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 25. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 25 in week 8 which will be the planned order receipt in week 9. There is no ending inventory.
Week 10:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 10. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 10 in week 9 which will be the planned order receipt in week 10.
Week 12:
The gross requirement is 45 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 45. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 45 in week 11 which will be the planned order receipt in week 12. There is no ending inventory.
Number of planned orders = 6
Inventory holding units= 0
Formula to calculate total cost of the plan:
Calculation of total cost:
The total cost is calculated by adding the product of number of planned order and setup cost with the product of inventory holding period and holding cost.
Hence, the cost for Lot for lot is $1,200.
b)

To determine: The ordering plan and cost for EOQ.
Introduction:
Economic order quantity (EOQ):
The economic order quantity is the number of units a firm must add to their stock while making each order. The notion of EOQ is to reduce the total cost of inventory of the firm.
Net requirements plan:
The net requirements plan is the plan which is established on the gross requirements plan formed by deducting the stock on and the scheduled receipts. If the total requirement is below the safety stock levels, a planned order is made based on the given lot sizing technique.
Answer to Problem 27P
The cost for EOQ is $2,370.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 |
Holding cost = $10 / week
Setup cost = $200
Lead time = 1 period
Stockout cost = $10 / week
Formula to calculate EOQ:
Calculation of EOQ:
The EOQ can be rounded off to 23 units.
Net requirements plan:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 | ||||||
Scheduled receipt | |||||||||||||
On hand (0) | 0 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 18 | ||
Ending inventory | 11 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 137 | |
Net requirement | 35 | 29 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 27 | |||||||
Planned order receipt | 46 | 46 | 0 | 23 | 23 | 46 | |||||||
Planned order release | 46 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 46 |
Week 2:
The gross requirement is 35 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 35. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 46 (1 Lot = 23) in week 1 which will be the planned order receipt in week 2. The ending inventory is 11 which will be available at week 3.
Week 3:
The on hand inventory is 11. Since there is no requirement, the ending inventory at week 3 is 11 which will be available at week 4.
Week 4:
The gross requirement is 40 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 11. Hence, the net requirement is 29. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 46 (1 Lot = 23) in week 3 which will be the planned order receipt in week 4. The ending inventory is 17 which will be available at week 5.
Week 5:
The on hand inventory is 17. Since there is no requirement, the ending inventory at week 5 is 17 which will be available at week 6.
Week 6:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 17. Hence, the net requirement is 0. Therefore there will be no planned order assembly. The ending inventory is 7 which will be available at week 7.
Week 7:
The on hand inventory is 7. Since there is no requirement, the ending inventory at week 7 is 7 which will be available at week 8.
Week 8:
The on hand inventory is 7. Since there is no requirement, the ending inventory at week 8 is 7 which will be available at week 9.
Week 9:
The gross requirement is 25 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 7. Hence, the net requirement is 18. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 23 (1 Lot = 23) in week 8 which will be the planned order receipt in week 9. The ending inventory is 5 which will be available at week 10.
Week 10:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 5. Hence, the net requirement is 5. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 23 (1 Lot = 23) in week 9 which will be the planned order receipt in week 10. The ending inventory is 18 which will be available at week 11.
Week 11:
The on hand inventory is 18. Since there is no requirement, the ending inventory at week 11 is 18 which will be available at week 12.
Week 12:
The gross requirement is 45 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 18. Hence, the net requirement is 27. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 46 (1 Lot = 23) in week 11 which will be the planned order receipt in week 12. The ending inventory is 19 which will be available in the next week.
Number of planned order releases = 5
Total Ending inventory = 137
Calculation of total setup cost:
Calculation of total holding cost:
Calculation of total cost:
The total cost is calculated by summing the total setup cost and total holding cost.
Hence, the total cost for EOQ is $2,370
c)

To determine: The ordering plan and cost for POQ.
Introduction:
Periodic order quantity (POQ):
The POQ is the standard quantity of units that will be ordered over a fixed period of time. This method is followed when the usage of raw materials is consistent and is predictable.
Net requirements plan:
The net requirements plan is the plan which is established on the gross requirements plan formed by deducting the stock on and the scheduled receipts. If the total requirement is below the safety stock levels, a planned order is made based on the given lot sizing technique.
Answer to Problem 27P
The cost for POQ is $1,100.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 |
Holding cost = $10 / week
Setup cost = $200
Lead time = 1 period
Stockout cost = $10 / week
Net requirements plan:
The planned ordered release in the POQ plan is planned in a way such that the demand for next two periods is satisfied.
Net requirements plan:
Period (weeks) | |||||||||||||
Item A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total |
Gross requirements | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 165 | ||||||
Scheduled receipt | |||||||||||||
On hand (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
Ending inventory | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
Net requirement | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 45 | ||||||||
Planned order receipt | 35 | 40 | 10 | 35 | 45 | ||||||||
Planned order release | 35 | 40 | 10 | 35 | 45 |
Week 2:
The gross requirement is 35 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 35. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 35 in week 1 which will be the planned order receipt in week 2. There is no ending inventory.
Week 4:
The gross requirement is 40 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 40. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 40 in week 3 which will be the planned order receipt in week 4. There is no ending inventory.
Week 6:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 10. Therefore, the planned order release will be 10 in week 5 which will be the planned order receipt in week 6. There is no ending inventory.
Week 9:
The gross requirement is 25 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 25. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 35 in week 8 which will be the planned order receipt in week 9. The ending inventory is 10 which will be available at week 10.
Week 10:
The gross requirement is 10 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 10. Hence, the net requirement is 0. Therefore there will be no planned order inventory.
Week 12:
The gross requirement is 45 (1 assembly). The on hand inventory is 0. Hence, the net requirement is 45. The lead time is 1 week. Therefore, the planned order release will be 45 in week 11 which will be the planned order receipt in week 12. There is no ending inventory.
Number of planned orders = 5
Inventory holding units= 10
Formula to calculate total cost of the plan:
Calculation of total cost:
The total cost is calculated by adding the product of number of planned order and setup cost with the product of inventory holding period and holding cost.
Hence, the cost for POQ is $1,100.
d)

To determine: The plan which has the lowest cost.
Answer to Problem 27P
The plan which has the lowest cost is POQ.
Explanation of Solution
The total cost for Lot for lot is $1,200. The total cost for EOQ is $2,370. The total cost for POQ is $1,100. The total cost is less for POQ when compared with EOQ and Lot for lot. ($1,100 < $2,370, $1,200)
Hence, the plan which has the lowest cost is POQ.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 14 Solutions
PRIN.OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT-MYOMLAB
- PepsiCo South Africa says the incident where a woman discovered part of a rodent in her loaf of bread, is anisolated occurrence.Durban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and…arrow_forwardThe deaths are included in the discharges; this includes deaths occurring in less than 48 hours and postoperative deaths. Rehabilitation had 362 discharges, 22 deaths, 1<48 hours, 0 Postoperative. what is the gross death rate for the rehabilitation service?arrow_forwardA copy machine is available 24 hours a day. On a typical day, the machine produces 100 jobs. Each job takes about 3 minutes on the machine, 2 minutes of which is processing time and 1 minute is setup time (logging in, defining the job). About 20 percent of the jobs need to be reworked, in which case the setup time and the processing time have to be repeated. The remainder of the time, the equipment is idle. What is the OEE of the equipment?arrow_forward
- How do you think we can keep updating Toyota's ideas as new technologies come out and what customers want keeps changing?arrow_forwardGiven how TPS has helped change things in so many fields, do you think there are parts of it that might be hard to use in areas that aren’t about making things, like in healthcare or services? If so, why do you think that might be?arrow_forwardDo you feel there is anything positive about rework?arrow_forward
- Do you think technology can achieve faster setup times? How would it be implemented in the hospital workforce?arrow_forwardIn your experience or opinion, do you think process changes like organizing workspaces make a bigger difference, or is investing in technology usually the better solution for faster setups?arrow_forwardHave you seen rework done in your business, and what was done to prevent that from occurring again?arrow_forward
- Research a company different than case studies examined and search the internet and find an example of a business that had to rework a process. How was the organization affected to rework a process in order to restore a good flow unit? Did rework hurt a process or improve the organization's operational efficiency? • Note: Include a reference with supportive citations in the discussion reply in your post.arrow_forwardSetup time is very important in affecting a process and the capacity of a process. How do you reduce setup time? Give examples of reducing setup time. Please Provide a referenecearrow_forwardDo you think TPS was successful? If so, how? Are there other companies that have used TPS? If so, give examples. Please provide a referencearrow_forward
- MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Contemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning


