Concept explainers
Total factor productivity (continuation of 12-43). Refer to the data for Problem 12-43.
Assume the fabric costs $4.00 per yard In 2017 and $4.10 per yard in 2016.
- 1. Compute Gable Company’s total factor productivity (TFP) for 2017.
Required
- 2. Compare TFP for 2017 with a benchmark TFP for 2016 inputs based on 2017 prices and output.
- 3. What additional information does TFP provide that partial-productivity measures do not?
12-43 Partial-productivity measurement. Gable Company manufactures wallets from fabric. In 2016, Gable made 2,160,000 wallets using 1,600,000 yards of fabric. In 2016, Gable has capacity to make 2,448,000 wallets and incurs a cost of $8,568,000 for this capacity. In 2017, Gable plans to make 2,203,200 wallets, make fabric use more efficient, and reduce capacity.
Suppose that in 2017 Gable makes 2,203,200 wallets, uses 1,440,000 yards of fabric, and reduces capacity to 2,295,000 wallets at a cost of $7,803,000.
- 1. Calculate the partial-productivity ratios for materials and conversion (capacity costs) for 2017, and compare them to a benchmark for 2016 calculated based on 2017 output.
Required
- 2. How can Gable Company use the information from the partial-productivity calculations?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 12 Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
- This cost data from Hickory Furniture is for the year 2017. Using the high-low method, express the factory utility expenses as an equation where x represents number of chairs produced. Predict the utility costs if 900 chairs are produced. Predict the utility costs if 750 chairs are produced. Using Excel, create a scatter graph of the cost data and explain the relationship between number of chairs processed and utility expenses.arrow_forwardWachowski Company reported these cost data for the year 2017. Use the data to complete the following table. Total prime costs Total manufacturing overhead costs Total conversion costs Total product costs Total period costsarrow_forwardFor each year 2016 and 2017 Percentage of on-time deliveriesarrow_forward
- Did Neuro Instruments achieve the target manufacturing cost per unit for HJ6 in 2017? Explain.arrow_forwardHow can you obtain better estimates of fixed and variable costs? Why would these better estimates be useful to Gower?arrow_forwardQ.Prepare income statements with one column for 2016, one column for 2017, and one column for the two years together using (a) variable costing and (b) absorption costing.arrow_forward
- Compute the Productivity Component indicate if favorable/(unfavorable). PROBLEM: Financial Perspective Gloria Corporation presents the following information for year 2020 & 2021 2020 2021 Sales P 45, 000 P 38, 000 Production Expenses Direct materials 12,000 9, 504 Direct labor 10,000 8, 976 Factory overhead Gross Profit 5, 000 5, 000 P 18, 000 P 14, 520 Operating Expenses Operating income 13,000 13, 000 P5, 000 P1, 520 During the year 2020, the corporation was able to sell 10, 000 units which is 25% above the sales in 2021. The same capacity was used for factory overhead and operating expenses for years 2020 and 2021. Other data are as follows: 2020 2021 Raw materials used ( kg) 1, 200 720 Direct labor hours 1, 000 816arrow_forwardCompute for throughput time Compute for Value added timearrow_forwarda) Classify each cost element as either fixed, variable, or mixed b) Calculate: (i) the variable production cost per unit and the total fixed production overhead. (ii) The total variable cost per unit and the total fixed costs Hint: Use the high-low method to separate mixed costs into their fixed and variable components. c) Assuming sales of 5,000 units, prepare a contribution margin income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020, detailing the components of total variable costs and total fixed costs, and clearly showing contribution and net income.arrow_forward
- Strategy, balanced scorecard. Stanmore Corporation makes a special-purpose machine, D4H, used in the textile industry. Stanmore has designed the D4H machine for 2017 to be distinct from its competitors. It has been generally regarded as a superior machine. Stanmore presents the following data for 2016 and 2017.arrow_forwardReconcile and explain the difference in 2017 operating incomes under variable and absorption costing.arrow_forwardAt what percentage of denominator level was the plant operating during 2017?arrow_forward
- Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College