Here’s one to sink your teeth into: The authors of the article “Analysis of Food Crushing Sounds During Mastication: Total Sound Level Studies” (Journal of Texture Studies [1990]: 165–178) studied the nature of sounds generated during eating. Peak loudness (in decibels at 20 cm away) was measured for both open-mouth and closed-mouth chewing of potato chips and of tortilla chips. Forty subjects participated, with ten assigned at random to each combination of conditions (such as closed-mouth potato chip, and so on). We are not making this up! Summary values taken from plots given in the article appear in the accompanying table. For purposes of this exercise, suppose that it is reasonable to regard the peak loudness distributions as approximately normal.
- a. Construct a 95% confidence interval tor the (inference in
mean peak loudness between open-mouth and closed-mouth chewing of potato chips. Interpret the resulting interval. - b. For closed-mouth chewing (the recommended method!), is there sufficient evidence to indicate that there is a difference between potato chips and tortilla chips with respect to mean peak loudness? Test the relevant hypotheses using α = 0.01.
- c. The means and standard deviations given here were actually for stale chips. When ten measurements of peak loudness were recorded for closed-mouth chewing of fresh tortilla chips, the resulting mean and standard deviation were 56 and 14, respectively. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that chewing fresh tortilla chips is louder than chewing stale chips? Use α = 0.05.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 11 Solutions
Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis
- Question 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardCharacterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forward
- Let G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C4 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C4 free). Prove that G has a vertex adjacent to all othersarrow_forward
- We consider a one-period market with the following properties: the current stock priceis S0 = 4. At time T = 1 year, the stock has either moved up to S1 = 8 (with probability0.7) or down towards S1 = 2 (with probability 0.3). We consider a call option on thisstock with maturity T = 1 and strike price K = 5. The interest rate on the money marketis 25% yearly.(a) Find the replicating portfolio (φ, ψ) corresponding to this call option.(b) Find the risk-neutral (no-arbitrage) price of this call option.(c) We now consider a put option with maturity T = 1 and strike price K = 3 onthe same market. Find the risk-neutral price of this put option. Reminder: A putoption gives you the right to sell the stock for the strike price K.1(d) An investor with initial capital X0 = 0 wants to invest on this market. He buysα shares of the stock (or sells them if α is negative) and buys β call options (orsells them is β is negative). He invests the cash balance on the money market (orborrows if the amount is…arrow_forwardDetermine if the two statements are equivalent using a truth tablearrow_forwardQuestion 4: Determine if pair of statements A and B are equivalent or not, using truth table. A. (~qp)^~q в. р л~9arrow_forward
- Determine if the two statements are equalivalent using a truth tablearrow_forwardQuestion 3: p and q represent the following simple statements. p: Calgary is the capital of Alberta. A) Determine the value of each simple statement p and q. B) Then, without truth table, determine the va q: Alberta is a province of Canada. for each following compound statement below. pvq р^~q ~рл~q ~q→ p ~P~q Pq b~ (d~ ← b~) d~ (b~ v d) 0 4arrow_forward2. Let X be a random variable. (a) Show that, if E X2 = 1 and E X4arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill