
Concept explainers
(a)
Interpretation: A company is considering where to locate its cafeteria to service six buildings. The location of the buildings and the fraction of the company’s employees working at these locations are given below. The optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the weighted rectilinear distance to all the buildings needs to be determined.
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Concept Introduction: When the differences between the
(a)

Answer to Problem 56AP
The optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the weighted rectilinear distance to all the buildings has been determined as
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The locations of the buildings and the fraction of company’s employees working at these locations are as given below:
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
In order to find out the optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the weighted rectilinear distance to all the buildings, the optimal coordinates a and b needs to be derived.
Optimal coordinate a:
The fraction of workforce needs to be multiplied by 12 for normalization.
Building | a | Weight | Cumulative Weight |
B | 1 | 1 | 1 |
A | 2 | 1 | 2 |
C | 3 | 2 | 4 |
E | 4 | 3 | 7 |
D | 5 | 3 | 10 |
F | 10 | 2 | 12 |
By dividing the total cumulative value by 12 and finding out the first location where the cumulative weight exceeds this value, following is calculated:
The first time where the cumulative weight exceeds the value
Optimal Coordinate b:
The fraction of workforce needs to be multiplied by 12 for normalization.
Building | a | Weight | Cumulative Weight |
B | 0 | 1 | 1 |
E | 2 | 3 | 4 |
C | 3 | 2 | 6 |
A | 6 | 1 | 7 |
F | 7 | 2 | 9 |
D | 9 | 3 | 12 |
By dividing the total cumulative value by 12 and finding out the first location where the cumulative weight exceeds this value, following is calculated:
The first time where the cumulative weight exceeds the value
Therefore the optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the weighted rectilinear distance to all the buildings is
(b)
Interpretation: A company is considering where to locate its cafeteria to service six buildings. The locations of the buildings and the fraction of the company’s employees working at these locations are given below. The optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the maximum rectilinear distance to all the buildings needs to be determined.
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Concept Introduction: When the differences between the
(b)

Answer to Problem 56AP
All the points on line connecting
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The locations of the buildings and the fraction of company’s employees working at these locations are as given below:
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Following is the calculation for finding out the optimal location of the cafeteria to minimize the maximum rectilinear distance to all the buildings:
Assuming
Recitlinear distance
A
2
6
8
B
1
0
1
C
3
3
6
D
5
9
14
E
4
2
6
F
10
7
17
Substituting the obtained values:
Thus
Hence all the points on line connecting
(c)
Interpretation: A company is considering where to locate its cafeteria to service six buildings. The locations of the buildings and the fraction of the company’s employees working at these locations are given below. The gravity solution needs to be determined.
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Concept Introduction: In a gravity modeling, locations are determined that minimizes the cost of transportation of raw materials from the supplier as well as manufactured goods to the market.
(c)

Answer to Problem 56AP
The optimal solution derived through gravity method is
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The locations of the buildings and the fraction of company’s employees working at these locations are as given below:
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
A company might be considering to provide a new facility in a region, for various reasons, like increasing the capacity of production of a particular existing product, introduction of a new product, or finding new markets in order to have business on their existing or new products. The smallest productive entity wherein a single commodity is manufactured is called a facility. In order to identify appropriate geographic locations in a region, gravity location models are used.
In the gravity solution method it is assumed that there is a linear growth in the transportation costs, with the quantity that is being shipped. In this case all the distances between two points are being calculated as the geometric distance on a plane.
Using gravity modeling, the optimal solution can be obtained by the following formula:
Following tabulation gives the values of coordinates multiplied by their respective weights:
a | b | Weight (w) | wa | wb |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
5 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 27 |
4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 6 |
10 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 14 |
Sum=12 | Sum=56 | Sum=59 |
Substituting the summation values of w, wa and wb in the formula:
Through gravity method the optimal solution arrived at is
(d)
Interpretation: A company is considering where to locate its cafeteria to service six buildings. The locations of the buildings and the fraction of the company’s employees working at these locations are given below. Supposing that the cafeteria must be located in one of the buildings; the particular building, minimizing the weighted rectilinear distance to all the buildings, needs to be identified.
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Concept Introduction: When the differences between the
(d)

Answer to Problem 56AP
The weighted rectilinear distance for C and E are minimum and hence the optimal solution will be either C or E.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The locations of the buildings and the fraction of company’s employees working at these locations are as given below:
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
The tabulation showing the coordinates along with their weights for various buildings is as shown below:
Building | a | b | Weights |
A | 2 | 6 | 1 |
B | 1 | 0 | 1 |
C | 3 | 3 | 2 |
D | 5 | 9 | 3 |
E | 4 | 2 | 3 |
F | 10 | 7 | 2 |
Below mentioned formula gives the rectilinear distance of a building from other buildings:
Similarly for all the other buildings the weighted rectilinear distance is being calculated as follows:
Therefore weighted rectilinear distance of building B from other buildings
Weighted rectilinear distance of building C from other buildings
Weighted rectilinear distance of building D from other buildings
Weighted rectilinear distance of building E from other buildings
Weighted rectilinear distance of building F from other buildings
From the results the weighted rectilinear distance for C and E are minimum and hence the optimal solution will be either C or E.
(e)
Interpretation: A company is considering where to locate its cafeteria to service six buildings. The locations of the buildings and the fraction of the company’s employees working at these locations are given below. Supposing that the cafeteria must be located in one of the buildings; using Euclidean distance the particular building needs to be identified.
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Concept Introduction: The simple measurement of distance in a straight line between two facilities is called Euclidean Distance.
(e)

Answer to Problem 56AP
The optimal solution can be considered as building C, as the Euclidean distance is least for the same.
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The locations of the buildings and the fraction of company’s employees working at these locations are as given below:
Building | Fraction of Workforce | ||
A | 2 | 6 | |
B | 1 | 0 | |
C | 3 | 3 | |
D | 5 | 9 | |
E | 4 | 2 | |
F | 10 | 7 |
Following is the formula for weighted Euclidean distance:
For building A, the weighted Euclidean distance from other buildings can be calculated as follows:
For building B:
For building C:
For building D:
For building E:
For building F:
From the results, Euclidean distance is least for building C and building C is the optimal solution.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
EBK PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
- What the different between a near miss and hazard 1. movement and contact 2. Contact 3. movementarrow_forwardThe fixed and variable costs for three potential manufacturing plant sites for a rattan chair weaver are shown: Site Fixed Cost Per Year Variable Cost per Unit 1 $700 $12.00 2 $1,000 $7.00 $2,200 $5.00 a) After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 1 is best below After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 2 is best between After rounding to the nearest whole number, site 3 is best above b) If the demand is 590 units, then the best location for the potent 3 units. and units. 600 0 60 units. g plant isarrow_forwardRefer to Table S6.1 - Factors for Computing Control Chart Limits (3 sigma) for this problem. Sampling 4 pieces of precision-cut wire (to be used in computer assembly) every hour for the past 24 hours has produced the following results: Hour R Hour X R Hour X R Hour X R 1 3.25" 0.71" 7 3.15" 0.58" 13 3.11" 0.85" 19 4.51" 1.56" 2 3.20 1.18 8 2.65 1.08 14 2.83 1.31 20 2.79 1.14 3 3.12 1.38 9 15 4. 3.39 1.31 10 5 2.97 1.17 6 2.76 0.32 3.02 0.71 3.12 1.01 2.75 1.33 16 2.74 0.50 22 11 2.73 1.17 17 2.76 1.43 23 12 2.87 0.45 18 2.64 1.24 21 2.75 1.03 3.18 0.46 2.94 1.53 24 2.54 0.97 Based on the sampling done, the control limits for 3-sigma x chart are (round all intermediate calculations to three decimal places before proceeding with further calculations): Upper Control Limit (UCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Lower Control Limit (LCL) = inches (round your response to three decimal places). Based on the x-chart, the wire cutting process has been The control limits…arrow_forward
- Choose a specific cars company. E.g Toyota, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Honda, Ford, Audi, Tesla Define a list of required machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials, etc. Develop and define the location of machinery, equipment, workstations, offices, rest areas, materials. Make the distribution in the manufacturing facility the most efficient way possible. Develop a process distribution for one specific product. Explain why you consider this is the most efficient distribution for this specific manufacturing facility. demonstrate the benefits of optimizing a production line with the best distribution of its equipment and spaces. To be more productive and profitable.arrow_forwardProvide a Synposis of the Articlearrow_forwardThe goal of understanding personality in negotiation is to better predict behavior, such as the counterparty's acceptance or rejection of a negotiation offer. One investigation used acoustic and visual cues to predict the likely behavior of a counterparty to a proposal. The best visual cue predictor of the counterparty (55%) was whether they _____. A. tilted their head B. had their arms and legs crossed C. steepled their fingers D. tapped a penarrow_forward
- Women who ask for what they want in negotiation are less well-liked than women who do not self-advocate. However, nonassertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash and are regarded as less competent because their behavior is regarded to be _____ and _____. A. high-negative feminine; low-positive masculine B. high-positive feminine; high-positive masculine C. high-negative masculine; low-negative feminine D. low-positive masculine; low-positive femininearrow_forwardThere are five most recognized personality traits that can reliably be measured and predict negotiator behavior in a number of different situations. All of the following are one of those "Big 5" personality traits except _____. A. conscientiousness B. introversion C. agreeableness D. openness to experiencearrow_forwardWith regard to reputation in negotiation, negotiators who use adversarial, stubborn, and ethically questionable behavior often have the effect of _____. A. improving their business relationships B. decreasing their effectiveness as a negotiator C. improving their business relationships D. decreasing their group statusarrow_forward
- When it comes to assertiveness, there is only a modest link between negotiators' self-views and how the counterparty sees them. Many negotiators come away from a negotiation thinking they came on too strong with the counterparty. The _____ refers to the fact that negotiators believe they are coming on too strong with the counterparty, but they actually are not. A. Collective trap illusion B. Attribution error C. Aggressive anchoring bias D. Line-crossing illusionarrow_forwardAs you think about the issue of using chatbots in contract negotiations, consider whether other facets and concepts of negotiations that we have discussed and whether they would be adequately addressed.arrow_forwardWhile I am not a fan of AI as of yet, I do understand the endless possibilities. Based on the research, it is clear that AI has great potential for negotiation (Yang, 2025). Herold et al. (2025) suggested that AI can flag potential risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to address them and mitigate potential problems proactively. AI can draft new contract templates by examining industry standards and past contracts, and AI technology can help lawyers spot errors and inconsistencies in contract drafts. In relation to risk management, AI can flag possible risks and liabilities, allowing negotiators to proactively address them and lessen potential problems, which can speed up the negotiation process, making the negotiation efficient because AI can industrialize tasks like document review, redlining, and finding potential issues, significantly reducing negotiation time. Lastly, AI can analyze vast amounts of data and identify errors, inconsistencies, and irregularities in…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
