The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs: NADH/H 2 O UQH 2 /FADH 2 Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced) FADH 2 / NADH NADH/ FMNH 2 Introduction: Reduction is a process of the gain of H + (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

When was the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker isradipine first patented and by whom? Please provide information on the origin and history of isradipine and who owns it/manufactures it.

9) Below, there is a representation of an SDS-PAGE gel. Assuming the samples in the MW standard have masses of: 66 kDa, 45 kDa, 36 kDa, 29 kDa, 24 kDa, 20.1 kDa, and 14.2 kDa, a) Figure 4: indicate where each of the measurements were taken and label as in II.6. figure 2 above. b) As in II.7. Table 1 above create Table 2 using the data below. Determine the r.f. values for the MW standards, plot the relative mobility versus the log of the mass for the standards, and use the best fit straight line to determine the molecular weights of the proteins in the whey, peak 1, and peak 2 lanes. (5 pts—this will be scaled up appropriately if your gel did not develop properly) dye MW Whey Peak 1 Peak 2

what are the different classes and some examples of neuroprotectants that can be used to treat, prevent, or combat neurotoxicity/a neurotoxicant...for example, antioxidants, nutraceuticals, etc.,..?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Answer 6

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Answer 7

Chapter 10, Problem 1Q

Summary Introduction

To review:

The better reducing agent ineach of the given pairs:

NADH/H₂O

UQH₂/FADH₂

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced)

FADH₂/ NADH

NADH/ FMNH₂

Introduction:

Reduction is a process of the gain of H⁺ (hydrogen ions) or the loss of O (oxygen), whileoxidation is a process of the gain of oxygen or the loss of hydrogen. Oxidizing agents add an oxygen to another substance or remove a hydrogen from a substance. Reducing agent, sn the other hand, either add a hydrogen or remove an oxygen from a compound.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Better reducing agents out of the mentioned substances in the given pairs of compounds are discussed below:

NADH/H₂O: NADH (reduced Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)is a better reducing agent because water molecule is considered weak as both, oxidizing as well as reducing agent, as it can reduce only a limited number of substances, whereas NADH can reduce a variety of substances. Moreover, the redox potential of NADH is lower as compared to the water molecules.

UQH₂/FADH₂: UQH₂(Ubiquinol-10-reduced) is a better reducing agent because it can easily propagate electrons from complex I. Moreover, its redox potential is significantly lower than the FADH₂ moiety.

Cyt c (reduced)/Cyt b (reduced): Cyt b (Cytochrome b), in its reduced form, is a better reducing agent because it can easily liberate electrons to reduce cytochrome a and has a much lower reduction potential than Cyt c.

FADH₂/NADH: NADH (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) is a better reducing agent than FADH2 (Flavin adenine dinucleotide) because of its lower reduction potential value and the ability to easily liberate electrons.

NADH/FMNH₂: FMNH₂ (flavin mononucleotide) is a better reducing agent than NADH ((Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) because of the fact that it can easily donate electrons and has a considerably lower reduction potential.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Conclusion

Therefore, it can be concluded that the ability to act as a reducing agent depends on the intricate reduction potential of a chemical species. In case a chemical species has a high reduction potential, it has a strong affinity for electrons, while a low reduction potential facilitates easy liberation of electrons. The liberated electrons can be used to reduce other molecules and therefore, a low reduction potential value confers higher reducing capabilities.

Answer 12

Ch. 10 - Prob. 1Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 2Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 3Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 4Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 5Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 6Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 7Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 8Q Ch. 10 - Prob. 1RQ Ch. 10 - Prob. 2RQ

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 10 Solutions