From a group of n people, suppose that we want to choose a committee of k , k ≤ n , one of whom is to be designated as chairperson. a. By focusing first on the choice of the committee and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are ( n k ) k possible choices. b. By focusing first on the choice of the nonchair committee members and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are ( n k − 1 ) ( n − k + 1 ) possible choices. c. By focusing first on the choice of the chair and then on the choice of the other committee members, argue that there are ( n − 1 k − 1 ) possible choices. d. Conclude from parts (a), (b), and (C) that k ( n k ) = ( n − k + 1 ) ( n k − 1 ) = n ( n − 1 k − 1 ) e. Use the factorial definition of ( m r ) to verify the identity in part (d).
From a group of n people, suppose that we want to choose a committee of k , k ≤ n , one of whom is to be designated as chairperson. a. By focusing first on the choice of the committee and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are ( n k ) k possible choices. b. By focusing first on the choice of the nonchair committee members and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are ( n k − 1 ) ( n − k + 1 ) possible choices. c. By focusing first on the choice of the chair and then on the choice of the other committee members, argue that there are ( n − 1 k − 1 ) possible choices. d. Conclude from parts (a), (b), and (C) that k ( n k ) = ( n − k + 1 ) ( n k − 1 ) = n ( n − 1 k − 1 ) e. Use the factorial definition of ( m r ) to verify the identity in part (d).
From a group of n people, suppose that we want to choose a committee of
k
,
k
≤
n
, one of whom is to be designated as chairperson.
a. By focusing first on the choice of the committee and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are
(
n
k
)
k
possible choices.
b. By focusing first on the choice of the nonchair committee members and then on the choice of the chair, argue that there are
(
n
k
−
1
)
(
n
−
k
+
1
)
possible choices.
c. By focusing first on the choice of the chair and then on the choice of the other committee members, argue that there are
(
n
−
1
k
−
1
)
possible choices.
d. Conclude from parts (a), (b), and (C) that
k
(
n
k
)
=
(
n
−
k
+
1
)
(
n
k
−
1
)
=
n
(
n
−
1
k
−
1
)
e. Use the factorial definition of
(
m
r
)
to verify the identity in part (d).
Basic Business Statistics, Student Value Edition (13th Edition)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, probability and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
MFCS unit-1 || Part:1 || JNTU || Well formed formula || propositional calculus || truth tables; Author: Learn with Smily;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV15Q4mCcHc;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY