Which of the following is NOT true regarding the California court case, Mendez v. Westminster? A)Arguments against the segregation of schools recognized, however, that segregation was constitutional B)Sylvia Mendez, then 12 years old, took the stand demonstrating her fluency in English C)Arguments in favor of segregation claimed that segregated schools for Mexicans helped Mexican American children better assimilate into American society D)Arguments against the segregation of schools claimed that the very act of segregating created inequality; that it created a mindset of superiority and inferiority dependent upon which school a child attended.

Which of the following is NOT true regarding the California court case, Mendez v. Westminster? A)Arguments against the segregation of schools recognized, however, that segregation was constitutional B)Sylvia Mendez, then 12 years old, took the stand demonstrating her fluency in English C)Arguments in favor of segregation claimed that segregated schools for Mexicans helped Mexican American children better assimilate into American society D)Arguments against the segregation of schools claimed that the very act of segregating created inequality; that it created a mindset of superiority and inferiority dependent upon which school a child attended.